5 reasons why Google-enabling your GPS is wrong

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

Angus Kidman06 January 2008, 10:24 PM

Magellan's new Maestro GPS systems include built-in Google searching -- which sounds great, until you switch your brain on for a few seconds. Here's five reasons to steer clear.


"Wanna do a story on this?" APC's indefatigable Web editor Dan Warne asks me in an email. "I reckon this is something people have definitely been waiting for . . . Google search built into your car."

'This' is Maestro's Elite 5340+GPRS GPS unit, unveiled at CES 2008, which boasts that it's the first GPS to include real-time Google Local Search, enabling you to use your GPS to tell you what events and shops are located near that freeway exit which you can't find. "Users simply type in what it is they are looking for and Google displays relevant results around the user's current location or a user-specified location," gushes the press release.

Of course I want to do a story on it -- but mostly to point out what a massively stupid idea it is. And lest you think I'm just a bad-tempered old curmudgeon, here's five reasons why.

(1) It's an accident waiting to happen. If mobile phones have taught us one thing, it's that most drivers are selfish pricks far more interested in the minutiae of their day-to-day lives than any considerations of safety or sensible behaviour. In places like Australia where it's illegal to talk on your mobile without a hands-free kit, people just go ahead and do it anyway. In parts of the US where it's not illegal, suggesting that perhaps it should be is viewed as some sort of fundamental assault on civil rights. In short: bugger concentrating on the traffic, I've got a call to make.

Chatting away on the phone seems dangerous enough, but the potential for an accident when someone decides to type 'hamburgers' into their GPS while driving is much, much higher, especially given the awkwardness of using on-screen keyboards. And it doesn't matter how many safety warnings get put on the packaging or how much Magellan emphasises the way you can send data to the device in advance of a trip; people are still going to do the wrong thing.

(2) It uses GPRS. Mmm, feel that data speed. OK, this product is destined for the US in the first instance, and GPRS is the only thing approaching nationwide coverage, but for Aussies, a Next G model would make more sense. Though lord knows what kind of price tag would be attached in that case.

(3) It promotes Google Local Search. Continuing the gushing, John Hanke, director of Google Maps & Earth, makes this observation in the announcement: "Magellan devices are powerful, interactive tools for navigation and discovery that serve as a cutting-edge platform for Google's robust local search capabilities." According to the release, typing 'Star Wars' into the device will provide a list of relevant, Han Solo-ready retailers near where you are located.

'Robust' is an odd word to use about a service which Google tries quite hard to keep invisible. If you visit local.google.com.au, you'll get a 404. Visit local.google.com and you get Google Maps. And if you type 'Star Wars' into the Australian Google Maps site, the first suggested result is a bookstore in Auckland. Work to be done, methinks.

(4) Retailers won't be able to sell it properly. "The successful vendors in this area will combine the compelling, dynamic services the connectivity potentially brings, in a device that is easy to use, has an attractive design, is affordable (both the device and subscription cost) and is well-explained to the customer at the point of sale," Canalys analyst Chris Jones proclaims in a rare moment of clarity in the release announcement.

Let's focus on that final point. My experiences of electronics retailing in Australia suggest that getting a GPS "well explained" could be quite a challenging task. It's more likely that I'm going to be unsubtly directed to whatever product has the best commission, or is offering a free trip to Fiji for the store that sells the most units. No doubt in this context the Google brand name will be a powerful attractant, but that doesn't mean that people will be buying the right unit.

(5) It's not out until March. Which presumably means much, much later (if at all) in Australia. Humbug.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

tin:

Couldn't agree more. About 50% of the people who drive at well under the speed limit down our highway in town (with no way to pass them), are talking on phones. 75% of people who fail to give way to me on roundabouts are on phones.

I'd hate to see what happens when people start doing Google searches for "cheap petrol"...
Or the effects of a car load of young people laughing hysterically at results for searches like "boobies" or their own names.

Call me old fashioned, but some of these hyped up new products seem to be answering needs and problems that just don't exist.

29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

wes:

You are right, I also think that there is no need for this at all at least for now. It just creates even more problems than it solves.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

dbmoodb:

mmm, a google enabled gps wow. How marvellous, I shall put my linux based tomtom gps unit in the trash. Oh wait ... I already have a large number of poi's in it ... and guess what ? .... a phone that does gprs. Ah wow now if i was serious about having google local search in my gps, i might even buy a 3g or fast enough model to do it.

Sure it is nice to put things together but ... what happens when you do not have reception ? it still works right ?..

I prefer the dash express
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS101671+02-Jan-2008+BW20080102
http://www.dash.net/product.php
somewhat cheaper. It has wifi and uses yahoo local search. (never actually used that yahoo thing...- might test it).

29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Vince F.:

Quite an entertaining piece, in which I tend to agree with. It is one of the more stupid ideas to have surfaced. Bad enough texting on a phone let alone using one of those little touch screens for a google search.Hrmm

29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Kelvin:

Another option for purchasing Stars Wars items would be to look up where you can buy the stuff before you get in the car.

Yet another product for dumbing down the next generation, for which 'research' means 'google' and 'wikipedia'.

29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Aubrey.conversely:

A pocket of sanity.

Finally - I have found curmudgeon corner!

This article and the comments so far are spot on:

"Call me old fashioned, but some of these hyped up new products seem to be answering needs and problems that just don't exist."

That just about sums up about 90% of the communications industry for me. Technology in search of a mass market.

If one percent of the brain power and money that goes into developing, marketing and reviewing these stupid toys was spent on, say, deploying decent comms technology in the remote health care or environmental monitoring fields, we'd be all much better off.

Anyway, I'm off to download a new ringtone.



29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony Brown:

Forgive me for being an absolute damp squib here and raining on the parade of new technology but whatever happened to pulling over onto the side of the road and looking it up in the old reliable street directory.
Still works for me and I'm pretty sure the battery won't run out.
And if I plan it properly I can find a quiet pub somewhere where I can sit down,have some lunch,a cool beer and then plan the next stage of my journey.
Mind you riding on a motorcycle doesnt really help those GPS
thingies as the vibrations make them pretty useless anyway.
Cya on the road sometime :):) T. Brown

29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Kelvin:

Hey there Tony - I actually find GPS most useful on a motorcycle when travelling through the city and suburbia. Stopping to look at a map is rather tiresome if it means pulling gloves off, taking off the backpack or reaching into the tail bag, etc... especially if it's raining!

Of course it's not a big deal when driving the car as you can flip through the street directory whilst eating your hamburger, steering the car with your thighs and talk on the phone wedged between ear and shoulder...

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony Brown:

Hi there Kelvin :):)
Yes I agree with all that you say but I've always found the idea of looking down at a GPS while doing 100km/hr
pretty frightening and I think I'd rather just pull over,have a ciggy,bit of a rest,look up where I'm going then get back on and get there in one piece.
As far as technology goes, I don't even own a mobile phone though of course I do have this PC which amuses me now and then between road trips of which I'm doing a lot more now that I've retired from the hum-drum 8hr/day grind.
Safe travelling to you and hope you had a good one :):)
T.Brown

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Paul:

I find it useful as a truck driver to use gps as it keeps my head out the window looking at you idiots overtaking my truck so you can hit the brakes and turn down that next side street.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags