Eee PC with Mr Bean
ASUS Australia's initial bizarre pricing policy was to make the Linux version of the Eee PC $50 more than the Windows XP one.

ASUS backs down on anti-Linux pricing

Angus Kidman24 June 2008, 11:41 AM

Asus has quietly ditched its ludicrous policy of charging $50 more for the Linux-based Eee PC 901 than the XP one.


As APC reported back in May, in most parts of the world the Linux and Windows XP versions of the Eee PC 900 have been selling for the same price (the Linux version offered 20GB of storage compared to the XP model's 12GB). In Australia, however, the XP 900 was launched at $599, while the Linux model was $649.

Six weeks later, Asus is singing a different tune. Both versions of the 901, which is due out in "late June" according to an Asus press release, will sell for the same price: $649. Unsurprisingly, this results in a price drop for the still rather new 900, which is now $549 — no matter which operating system you choose. Sanity, it seems, has prevailed in the ASUS pricing department. Or maybe (and this is pure hypothesis, unfounded rumour and vicious speculation) Microsoft decided buying marketshare for Windows wasn't such a great idea after all.

Asus is also still selling the original Eee PC model for $479, though just how long this will continue for is open to speculation. Several online retailers have offered the machine for under $350 in recent weeks, and the return to equality in pricing for Windows and Linux versions across the series might remove a key incentive to buy the smaller-screened version. (Speaking as a frequent traveller, I'll take the reduced weight over the increased screen size, but that doesn't seem to be the majority view.)


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

moyun (New user):

I do like the bigger screen and batter life, but not the price tag. Add some extra money, I may buy a more powerful laptop. I do like the original 7inch model, now only about 299...

24 June 2008, 9:15 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Rambo Tribble (New user):

Well, on the principle that a better product demands a higher price, the $50 upcharge seems to drastically undervalue the differential between Windows and Linux.

25 June 2008, 12:12 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

xpyttl (New user):

Still, it seems as if Linux users are still asked to pay the Microsoft tax. Apparently Linux users subsidize some of whatever M$ charges ASUS. Although I suppose Rambo's point is valid, we shouldn't be paying for cost but rather value.


25 June 2008, 10:13 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags