htc
Released in the US, T-Mobile's Android-powered G1 uses the HTC Dream smartphone.

First Android phone - nothing more than a competent iPhone rival

Alexander Gambotto-Burke24 September 2008, 3:52 PM

Its significance lies in the fact that it's the first smartphone to run Google's Android OS. But as a competitor to the iPhone, T-Mobile's G1 won't worry Apple just yet.


When Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin arrived on roller blades at the press conference in New York they clearly demonstrated the enthusiasm with which Google is introducing the world's first Android phone. After over a year of speculation, the “gPhone” has made its debut in the extravagant form of the T-Mobile G1 – also known as the HTC G1, or even the HTC Dream, if you like.

“What really gives me pleasure with the launch of G1 for T-Mobile,” Brin announced to his enraptured audience, “is that I'm a bit of a geek. And I really like tinkering with things ... I get that same kind of pleasure playing with Android on the G1.”

He outlined his first contribution to the Android world – an app that measures the time it takes for you to throw your G1 up in the air and catch it, or for it to hit the floor – and, after some laughter, and the ever-grinning Larry Page quickly confirming this somewhat dangerous program wouldn't make it to users - he neatly summed up why Android is so significant. “It's just very exciting for me as a computer geek to be able to have a phone I can play with and modify,” he said, “and innovate upon, just like I have with computers in the past.”


If that sounds like a shift in direction, you're not wrong: Android was developed under the pretense that smartphones are the new PCs, and Google is looking to conquer the smartphone market. By design, Android offers users all the services and facilities currently available on the desktop, including, pivotally, the ability to freely write and upload their own software. This finally puts smartphones on par with the open, unrestricted platform Android's developers hope to succeed. (And with mobile phones vastly outselling new desktop units, who's to say it won't?)

That said, one look at the G1 will make it apparent that Google's foremost adversary in the smartphone war is not the PC, currently - unsurprisingly, it's Apple. From the streamlined UI to touch-controlled document handling and the hardware features themselves, the G1 is a piece-for-piece direct competitor to the iPhone. And in this sense, the launch was a bit of a letdown: Google promised a revolution with Android, and right now all we have is a very competent iPhone rival. The introduction of an intuitive, touch-controlled copy-paste feature (based on short and long presses) will certainly be appreciated by iPhone users, but it's hardly enough to turn the tide.

So, what exactly can you expect from the G1? Well, it's launching at US$179, US$20 less than the iPhone 3G. It has a 3.17 in screen running at 480x320, and features both an iPhone-esque touch-screen keyboard, and a slide-out QWERTY keypad.
 
As you might imagine, it's slightly thicker than the iPhone (by about a third of an inch), and a little bit heavier, too. It's fully 3G-compatible, but Bluetooth is reportedly underpowered in the first release of the Android OS. A 3.1 megapixel camera is available (an improvement on the iPhone's 2 megapixel one), and it has a MicroSD slot, which supports up to 8GB cards. It comes in black, white, and brown. (Brown?)

Of course, the G1's key advantage over Apple's product has nothing to do with hardware or software tricks, and everything to do with Google. The Android phone acts as a simple, clean convergence point for all of the massively popular services Google offers – Gmail, Google Maps, Google Docs, Google Reader – that are disparately provided on the PC, and even the iPhone.

For heavy users of Google's web applications, the G1 will be extremely appealing - especially so if they're sick of carting their laptops around. The web has become synonymous with Google and the online applications it freely provides to users; with Android and the G1, users have access to all of Google's web services on a single device. An entire suite of programs, basically, is available to G1 users in the cloud.

Beyond this, it's obvious that it's up to Android developers to make the most of this platform, and indeed make it the more appealing prospect over the iPhone. The most important service all Android phones will provide is the Android Marketplace, which, Google stresses, is not a “store” in any way, shape, or form. It's an open market where developers can offer their work without prior approval from Google. Other than the obvious freedoms this offers programmers, this also means Android will constantly evolve, and, one hopes, constantly improve. Andy Rubin took the stage at the G1's launch to explain: “A developer will be able to use it as a platform, and be able to develop their applications on the Android platform. But also, because of its openness, a developer will be able to modify the platform to make the platform better. Therefore, because the platform is open, we think Android is somewhat future-proof. It's future-proof because it has openness built-in.”

There's no doubt Android has revolutionary potential, but whether most users will be especially sensitive to this is unknown. As the platform improves, and as the number of applications for it grows exponentially, it seems impossible that Android won't eventually surpass proprietary platforms like the iPhone in both quality and basic quantity of available services.

But what does this mean for the G1, right now? Maybe not too much. If you're a staunch iPhone advocate, HTC's offering is unlikely to sway you; conversely, however, if you're in the market for a new smartphone, the G1's lower price and comparable features will probably make it the easier sell. One thing's for sure, though: whichever side you're on, if you're overjoyed by the sight of Steve Jobs rollerblading into the next WWDC, remember who to thank.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Your Average Joe (Regular user):

'Competent' iPhone rival !
That's a pretty good review ! The iPhone is no lightweight product and after a bit of tinkering and patching, it's actually a solid offering from the Apple.

24 September 2008, 4:25 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

shrike (User):

The screenshot shown on the device looks scarily like screenshots for windows 7. Why do open source developers think we all want something that looks like windows?

24 September 2008, 5:30 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Hemma (User):

Agreed. A bit to Desktop-like kind of experience..... But then again, being open source, the users could probably tinker with it to suit their own personal needs.

I can see that it would suit people who likes to add software and change themes and so on. Also would be good to be able to use alternative software as well.... whereas I guess the iPhone suits those who likes things straight out of the box.

24 September 2008, 5:44 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

I'm gonna freak at the next person who says an iPhone costs US$200. It's just doing damage to think this way. Not mentioning it's a complete and utter lie. The cost of an iPhone is the cheapest price you can buy one outright, with no ongoing commitments. Then you add or take the cost/saving you have on calls, text and data.

I can see Android phones as being the new Linux/Mobile-PC phones, great fun and highly configurable, but totally different to Apple's upper-market position for the iPhone. Anyone would agree that you'd be a fool to take Apple head-on, but I welcome anyone to the market who can give Apple something to worry about.

Too bad also that without the iPhone's touch screen technology, the gPhone is just the same glorified handheld computer from the 90s.

I'd say that Android/G1 is quite unrelated to the iPhone. The iPhone made a total revolution to the mobile phone industry. They didn't just make a new phone, they redesigned the whole concept of mobile communication from scratch. I remember someone asking me the other day, "How do I go back to the wallpaper screen? You know, the one where you don't do anything on?" Ugh, I hope to god we can see some stuff in Android that isn't either old-school Nokia norms or poor 1:1 iPhone cloning.

24 September 2008, 5:56 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Discosis (User):

Quoting McBanjo:
I'm gonna freak at the next person who says an iPhone costs US$200. It's just doing damage to think this way. Not mentioning it's a complete and utter lie.

I agree. BUT, in this case, its comparing apples to apples (what an unfortunate choice of phrase!). The iphone is 199 *on a 2yr contract*, the G1 is 179 *on a 2yr contract*.

Apparently the G1 is 399 outright with a 90-day wait for unlocking. THAT is a far more interesting price point.

25 September 2008, 9:58 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

I know what you're saying, but it's still a dangerous and risky way to compare. It's hard to put a dollar value on a telco's service, coverage or an individual's preference or experience with a particular telco over a two-year period. Without the phone being commitment-free, you're still largely comparing apples and oranges.

The reason someone would choose one phone over another is because the benefits and costs of the phone would exceed the other's. Displaying a $20 saving as a core benefit over an iPhone is highly irrational thinking, even if the phone model and features were exactly the same. They are bounded by different phone networks, so many benefits and costs aren't taken into account at all. This makes it difficult to compare them to other phones in the market, and it turns the buyer's decision process into a convoluted mess of trying to predict an uncertain future.

What's wiser is to say, "This phone costs X, and this phone costs Y, which one do I buy?" Then no matter what happens in the telco industry, you'll always be able to change to the best service plan for your needs.

25 September 2008, 4:54 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Discosis (User):

Quoting McBanjo:
Displaying a $20 saving as a core benefit over an iPhone is highly irrational thinking

Agreed, but it must work because that's what they've done.

Yes it's on a different network with different plans and different coverage, but the sticker price is what the consumer sees first and foremost.

Apparently they think the $20 price difference is enough to get it noticed, who are we to say otherwise :)

25 September 2008, 6:02 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

Yes this is what I'm trying to point out. It's ludicrous that people actually believe it to have any significance. The problem lies where their misleading and deceiving marketing techniques are being perpetuated by journalists who don't understand their readers.

25 September 2008, 6:53 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Potoroo (User):

A touch screen interface and a QWERTY keyboard is interesting. I suspect there are a lot of people who would find a purely touch screen interface clumsy if, say, they did a lot of emailing. That said, I wonder how usable the keys on the keyboard are (and please nobody answer in American - what is "a third of an inch" anyway?).

26 September 2008, 9:56 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags