Microsoft revises ‘netbook’ hardware spec for Windows 7

David Flynn25 May 2009, 8:00 AM

Netbooks eligible to for the low-cost Windows 7 Starter edition can’t exceed a 10.2 inch screen or 1GB of RAM, although larger drives and faster processors are allowed.


Microsoft wants to cut netbooks down to size – specifically, 10.2 inches. According to documents allegedly leaked from one of the company’s many hardware partners, that’s the biggest display allowed on a device which can qualify for Microsoft’s discounted OEM rate on Windows 7 Starter.

Make a laptop with a larger screen and Microsoft will call it a notebook and strike Windows 7 Starter from the list of OS options and replace it with either Windows 7 Home Basic or Windows 7 Home Premium, both of which are expected to be significantly more expensive.

The 10.2 inch screen size is well under the 12.1 inches allowed for today’s netbook licences of Windows XP and is the clearest sign yet of Microsoft’s eagerness to reign in the growth of netbooks and steer the market back towards laptops which run a higher-margin version of Windows.

It’s not that Microsoft doesn’t like netbooks, which it is these days preferring to call ‘small notebooks’ (similar to how an increasing number of vendors call them mini-notebooks).

The company has made plenty of noise about how well Windows 7 will run on their modest hardware and Windows 7 chief Steven Sinofsky included a netbook in his presentation when Windows 7 made its public debut late last year. But low-cost netbooks demand an equally low-cost OS, and when your competitor (Linux) is free you have no choice but to slash the sticker price and cut your profits.

Dell's Inspiron Mini 12 is a netbook, Microsoft says today, but when
Windows 7 comes out it'll magically transform into a notebook!


However, reducing the maximum permissible screen size to 10.1 inches means that larger netbooks such as Dell’s Inspiron Mini 12, Samsung’s NC20 and Acer’s updated Aspire One 751 will all be considered notebooks and hit for a full Windows 7 licence, regardless of the fact in every other respect they’re a netbook.

The maximum amount of RAM that can be factory-fitted into a netbook running Windows 7 will remain pegged at 1GB, although buyers can fit more memory provided the device itself allows for such an upgrade.

In some models there’s no expansion slot and the memory is soldered directly onto the motherboard; in others the chipset itself won’t recognise more than 1GB of RAM. 2GB is however the maximum that the current crop of Atom-based chipsets can support.

The rest of the hardware checklist is more generous than today’s XP-based spec set. Storage was previously pegged at 160GB for a hard drive and 32GB on a solid state drive; in the Windows 7 era those are bumped up to 250GB and 64GB respectively.

Microsoft has also lifted the limitation on the netbook’s graphics (today’s devices can’t go beyond DirectX 9) and will allow touchscreens with a capacitive panel rather than those based on the simpler resistive technology, as capacitive panels allow for multi-touch gestures.

And instead of today’s laundry list of approved processors, which typically range from 1GHz to 1.6GHz, Microsoft has decreed that netbooks can run any CPU up to 2GHz, as long as it has a single core and draws no more than 15 watts.

This leaves a surprising amount of headroom: Intel’s Atom N270 has a peak drain of a mere 2.5 watts, while its latest ultra-low voltage Core 2 Solo chips which are appearing in thin and light notebooks like the Acer Timeline top out at just 5.5 watts.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

whitecros (New user):

how pathetic. how can one company have so much control over what determines a netbook. i understand that limits do need to be set and agree that maybe the big companies should look at setting limits but where does microsoft get off thinking they have the right to dictate to the computer industry. linux this is your perfect opportunity to sneak in and shut windows our of netbooks!!

25 May 2009, 8:27 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Aubrey (Advanced member):

Quoting whitecros:
i understand that limits do need to be set and agree that maybe the big companies should look at setting limits....

Could you explain why limits need to be set?

I really don't see this as anything other than MS doing what it always does - using its market position to dictate "standards" that suit it's short-term commercial interests and limit competition. With any luck, major OEMs will raise their middle finger and let the "real" market determine what is required. (But I doubt that will happen)

And why is MS allowed to control markets by these tactics? Surely this is not too much different to Telstra controlling third-party ISP access to wholesale exchange services. That, at least, seems to be getting some attention from the ACCC.






25 May 2009, 8:55 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting Aubrey:
Could you explain why limits need to be set?

I'd also like to know, why such measures are essential and not just market gouging and manipulation?


Quoting Aubrey:
And why is MS allowed to control markets by these tactics?

These measures are only mandated if the market continues to tolerate it. The market gave Vista a collective thumbs up come purchase time, if the conditions of sale for Win 7 remain onerous then I'd expect the outcome to be similar.

The simple answer is to point your purchase decisions to positive offerings like the new Dell Linux-books and let Microsoft work out why their till is shorter than expectations. Even a few percent should be enough to make Microsoft sit up and take notice.

As a postscript I have to wonder on Microsoft's decision to peg usable memory at 1Gb which effectively cripples its own offering, particularly given small specialist builds of Linux like Puppy will offer all that's needed in a netbook from a quarter of the MS imposed memory ceiling. Limiting the hardware your software can be licensed on sure looks like shooting yourself in the foot to me. MS may well need to adopt some canine references to their netbook builds too, given they will be destined to be dogs in performance terms.

25 May 2009, 9:05 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Aubrey (Advanced member):

Quoting Raindog:
The simple answer is to point your purchase decisions to positive offerings......


I do that all the time. So far the only outcome is an addiction to caffeine (but only caffeine sourced from organic, fair-trade, sustainable sources that have pictures of attractive and happy indigenous people on their promotional posters)- and a chronic shortage of ready money.


25 May 2009, 10:42 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting Aubrey:
but only caffeine sourced from organic, fair-trade, sustainable sources that have pictures of attractive and happy indigenous people on their promotional posters

I never drink McDonald's coffee! Coffee brewed by members of the Cola Generation is destined to taste as bitter as it always does.

On a slightly more serious note directing your purchase decisions does work. While I'm sure individually the Microsofts and other giants don't give a flying fig what I buy, they do take notice as similar buying patterns become commonplace.

The general rejection of Vista has forced Microsoft to begrudgingly make some consumer demanded changes, (far from enough changes, but a good changes all the same) and that can only be a good thing.

I can buy a Windows based Netbook and trash the OS for similar money to buying one pre-equipped with another OS but I'd rather encourage the offer of choice. I can encourage that without any martyrdom required and without any software house deciding "where I want to go today".


25 May 2009, 11:56 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

The Big Baboo (User):

Waaaaaaaaat :( Are these "Microsoftie Morons" trying to tell us now what we can and can't buy.Man !!! If I decide to buy a notebook/netbook in the next couple of months I'll tell the salesman "No thank you,No OS included for me :) I'm going to use Linux" and that'll burn the Micro-Octopus up I reckon ;)

25 May 2009, 8:51 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags