Some Linux and Mac users need Office 2010 licence to run Web Apps

David Flynn
18 May 2010, 8:40 AM


Microsoft has an unexpected ‘Gotcha’ for business customers running Linux or Mac OS – they’ll need to buy an Office licence to legally use Office Web Apps...


Microsoft made plenty of noise about the Office Web Apps from its just-launched Office 2010 suite being free and running on Linux and Mac systems as well as Windows.

But it seems there’s a catch, at least for business customers who’ve moved some of their staff away from Microsoft’s OS.

According to Microsoft, a company which hosts the Office Web Apps on its own server using SharePoint 2010 will need to buy an Office license for each user of the lightweight Web apps – even if those users aren’t running Windows.

The rationale is tied to Microsoft’s volume licensing deal under which a company purchases Office licenses by the hundreds, thousands or even more.

Although Office Web Apps are ostensibly free, with businesses able to run them as an add-on for the SharePoint 2010 server software, it seems that the apps can be installed only if the company has a volume license for Microsoft Office.

So if a company had 100 staff running Windows PCs with Office 2010, but another 50 on linux plus an additional 20 on Apple Macs, they’d be up for 170 Office 2010 licenses.

Microsoft vice-president for the Office Business Platform Jeff Teper told tech journalist Tim Anderson that “you do need a volume license for each user.”

And while Teper allowed that Microsoft ‘s volume licensing “is tailored to each customer (and) we will do specific things for each customer’s need… the blanket statement is that its available for volume license customers per user.”

Asked if this meant that a Linux user need a license for Microsoft Office in order to access Office Web Apps, Tepper replied “Yes, that’s our default licensing.”


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (Cornerstone member):

We are talking about the company that uses Client Access Licenses for server products... Buying Office licenses for the self hosted web based version if just the same deal.

18 May 2010, 9:17 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

Why would you migrate your business away from MS and then utilise Office Web Apps. There are plenty of better alternatives, The only ones that will get caught out are those who did no planning.

18 May 2010, 9:18 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Cornerstone member):

Quoting Raindog:
Why would you migrate your business away from MS and then utilise Office Web Apps.


Well, I can understand it - basic client boxes, network boot a tiny Linux distro with just a web browser, and have them connect to a Windows Server with the Office Web version and Outlook Web Access. Would save a small fortune on system costs and maintenance.
That said, there are better options... Pay Google for their web office stuff for example. Or use Open Office on slightly better clients (or through a Linux remote X server).

18 May 2010, 9:24 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

Quoting Tin:
and have them connect to a Windows Server with the Office Web version and Outlook Web Access.

Why would you choose this route when you had mad cost performance improvements at the desktop end.


Quoting Tin:
That said, there are better options...

Sure are, like I said only those who fail to plan are likely to get caught out.


18 May 2010, 9:29 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Cornerstone member):

Quoting Raindog:
Why would you choose this route when you had mad cost performance improvements at the desktop end.


Well if MS had made it a simpler deal to buy server software, then it would make perfect sense. But in this case, I will agree... There's little saving to be made if MS want you to pay for CALs... Which is what they are effectively doing since neither Macs nor Linux boxes will run the software they are happy to license out.

18 May 2010, 10:26 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

BrownieBoy (User):

If I'm reading this right, then *all* users need an Office licence to run the MS Web Apps.

So why does the headline mention only Linux and Mac? It seems to imply that Windows users are automatically covered for this, but the main text of the article makes it clear that this is not the case. Not all companies have signed up to Microsoft's Volume Licensing.

18 May 2010, 11:37 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Cornerstone member):

Quoting BrownieBoy:
If I'm reading this right, then *all* users need an Office licence to run the MS Web Apps. So why does the headline mention only Linux and Mac?


Well look at it this way - MS Office 2010 will not run on Linux or MacOS, yet MS are saying users need to buy that full package to run the web hosted version. They are refusing to allow (even for money) people to run the Web Apps without the normal software.

18 May 2010, 12:10 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

doofus (New user):

Slightly misleading headline - these licencing issues only apply to the Sharepoint based version (as you go on to mention in the article). The other 95% (a number I just made up) of Office Web App users using the Windows Live or Facebook docs.com version have nothing to worry about.

19 May 2010, 3:53 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user