10 reasons you should get Vista

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

Dan Warne22 January 2007, 1:25 AM

Microsoft says Vista offers a richer experience and that you should be getting ready for a new day? Cut the crap! Here are 10goodreasons you should get Vista.


My colleague Ashton Mills published the top 10 reasons you shouldn't get Vista this morning.

I see his point on some fronts -- admittedly, Microsoft's official publicity material hasn't done a great job of explaining the basic benefits of Vista.

Microsoft's talk of Vista's ‘richer experience' and ‘getting ready for a new day' just makes the hardened tech user roll their eyes and move on.

However, I've been running Vista at APC since the earliest leaked builds, and witnessed its extraordinary evolution as Microsoft meandered its way towards the final product.

Sure, the earlier versions included some bold features which were dropped for the sake of familiarity in the final version, but there's still lots to appreciate about the "RTM" version of Vista.

I'm not talking here about a nicer user interface or security - I figure APC readers already know how to run a secure XP box and how to de-Fisher-Price it.

Here are the real benefits: things that will actually make a difference to you day-to-day.

 

1. UI built for the era of video and digital photography
It's not actually Microsoft's key selling point, but the thing that everyone will probably find the most useful about Vista is that photos, videos and music are not treated the same as Word documents any more. When you open a folder of photos, they come up as they'd appear in Google Picasa or Apple iPhoto. There's inbuilt basic photo editing. Music folders come up in columns of ID3 tags, a bit like iTunes. Finally, you don't have to rely so much on third party apps to work with your files.

 

2. Image-based install
PC enthusiasts spend a lot of time installing and reinstalling Windows for their own and other people's PCs. The Vista DVD is actually a pre-installed version of the OS in a compressed form, making it substantially quicker to install. It's also much easier to customise for unprompted installation with the correct defaults, and you can even install your own software automatically at the time Vista is installed - like slipstreaming service packs but on steroids. Read more...

 

3. Up-to-date driver base and better driver handling on installation
Enjoy the just-baked driverbase while it lasts (19,500 drivers large). If you do need to use a special disk driver during installation in the future it won't have to be on floppy disk. Now you can use a USB memory key or CD. Also, Microsoft is now making much greater use of Windows Update for provision of drivers that aren't present in the Windows RTM driver base. Windows Chief Jim Allchin talks about it here.

 

4. Desktop search and search folders built in
Yes, you could already get umpteen desktop search apps including Windows Desktop Search from Microsoft for XP, but you can't underestimate the importance of it being installed on every single Vista PC. Now when your mum rings saying she's lost a document she's been working on all day you can just direct her to the start menu. Also, desktop search folders are handy for finding stuff you haven't necessarily got stored in one folder but that is useful to gather together from time to time (e.g. documents with "tax, invoice or receipt" in them).

 

5. Sleep mode that actually works.
It's a small thing, but makes a big difference: Vista has finally caught up to operating systems that can sleep near instantly and wake up reliably, in a couple of seconds. Read more...

 

6. Rock-solid laptop encryption
The data on your laptop is worth a hell of a lot to an identity thief. Vista's "Bitlocker" encryption (only in Enterprise and Ultimate versions) does heavy-duty, full-drive encryption, so you can be certain that unless a thief has your password there's simply no way they're going to get in. Read more...

 

7. Better file navigation
Vista now has some time-saving features like favourite folders displayed in the left column of every Explorer window, as well as "breadcrumbed" folder lists allowing you to quickly jump backward and forward through a path. Sure, these should have been put into Windows years ago, but at least they're here now.

 

8. Inbuilt undelete
Or, depending on how you look at it, inbuilt rolling backup. Every time you make a change to a file or delete it, Windows keeps the previous version. As a result, the "oh !@#$ I just overwrote my entire PhD with Document1" feeling can be quickly assuaged. Read more...

 

9. DirectX10
OK, this isn't so much a benefit as your hand being forced: DirectX 10 will never be made for XP, and a raft of games have already been announced ‘exclusively' for 10. Admittedly it does take gaming graphics to the next level, but it's very much tied to Vista.

 

10. Face it, you have no choice
When Microsoft brings out a major renovation to Windows, you can choose to ignore it for a year or two, but then the device drivers start drying up for older versions of Windows, your friends start asking questions about their new PC that you can't answer, and even if you use Linux, you'll inevitably need familiarity with Microsoft's latest interoperability blockers. Face it: your arse belongs to Redmond.

Now read the other side of the argument...

 

Post your comment



First 50 Comments

View All Comments (142) RSS feed Email alert

tin:

Reason 10 is about the only one I'll be getting Vista for.
Real pain in the ar$e is the cost of having both XP and Vista on the PC so I can still use software and play games that just don't work in Vista.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

Yes, none of this is a real fact that why vista is better than XP. Installation by images? bah! you only install once ... or transfer once! ( see licence ).

New engine with graphics 3d? Cute! but do I need this for work? First I do when I enter on an XP is disable its "new" look, its "awfull" menu, returning to classic.

Direct X 10 could be installed on XP, but M$ don't want to make it happen.

Face it, i'll have vista, but when i have to buy it with a new computer from any vendor that says "or you buy our computer with Vista or you don't buy the computer".

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Q:

You can always throw out Vista and get a refund or it, its in the EULA.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

You can actually insist on XP from Dell etc.

If more people did that, then maybe even Microsoft can't get rid of XP. Just like Intel can't get rid of the x86 even thought they tried with the Itanium. Same for IBM when they tried to shift to MCA instead of staying "IBM PC Compatible"

If enough people ignored Vista and stuck to Windows XP, even Microsoft would have to remain "Windows XP Compatible".

And then we can concentrate on genuine innovations and features rather than helping Microsoft extend their monopoly via the frog boiling method.

This is the number one reason to not use Vista.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

People who buy Dells, or any other name brand manufactured garbage for that matter know nothing about computers, and will get what Dell pushes on them. For all they know, "Dell" is the version of Windows they are running.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

This has to be one of the most ignorant comments I have read.

So ignorant, that I regret responding…


29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ed:

hey geek do yourslef a favor and get some p*ssy.........just because you are some computer nerd who has nothing better to do than build his computer to the max....doesn't mean that there are million of people who are fine with a dell or gateway computer.......these are the millions of people who actually have a life

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

RickyZed20:

touché brotha

29 February 2008, 8:37 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous9832184:

Now we know why they need Dells, because people like you are breeding. The majority is the lowest common denominator...

29 February 2008, 8:37 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jon:

I agree with this guy.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Vin:

This is far too broad a generalization. Just because somebody buys a big brand computer does not mean they are ignorant. It could be they have neither the time, the desire, or the money to acquire a system another way.

However, I do believe I understand your point. While there seem to be a lot of people in the techie community that would love to boycott Vista, the vast majority of purchasers from large companies will "just not care". So, regardless of how hard a community were to try, it's just not possible. Microsoft is simply too big to be forced into dual support by a relatively small group of enthusiasts.

And to the [insert explitive here] who decided to go on a generic "nerd get a girlfriend" rant, get your head out of wherever it is, and maybe consider a taking a hiatus on breathing for a while.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

KeremE:

It is actually happening now. Vendors are just introducing new options for their hcomputers with XP instead of Vista. Microsoft says it will not end the support for XP :)


29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Net:

I like reason 10, the rest doesn't impress me much. I guess only gamer will get Vista for this time being.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

Redmond may think they own my desktop, my server racks, and rearward parts of my anatomy, but they dont!
There is a big gap between eventually adopting a later version of Windows and running in a lather to blindly accept anything the Redmondians dished up.
The foaming at the mouth fanboys can pay top dollar and wear all the early adoptor pain while those that hold out or who seek out alternative OS's where possible are the ones who hold the real power and will reap the rewards.
Immediately swapping to Vista would be commercial suicide for all but those who Microsoft already heavily subsidise.
After the frenzy of fanboys has subsided and the sales inevitably thin, the pricing if nothing else of Vista will move to more realistic levels.
Of all the plusses listed only reason 10 offers a compelling arguement and it does not imply any ugency to adopt now!

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

FostWare:

Because I have no choice to upgrade, since my X8800 doesn't have drivers yet, and due to Vista's DRM/TCPA driver model, I may not have until they are okay'd by America's MPAA.

At least XP would load Windows 2000 driver in a pinch.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

mistywindow:

When did M$ ever drop the price of their bloatware?

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

exactly look at xp.its been out for 6 years or more and still sells for 150 bux.thats 50 bux small families dont have come on ms make a family version that costs 50 bux.u'll still get ur gold plated vibe to ream every1 else with.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Potoroo:

You can't be serious! After years of having M$ lie to us about how good Vista was going to be (none of the genuinely good stuff we were promised is there), how can anyone seriously think any of these tweaks can justify the outrageous price tag? Furthermore, APC doesn't pay nearly enough attention to the hidden costs of Vista's built-in DRM.

PS: we say 'arse' in Australia. 'Ass' is American.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne:

Thanks for the important pickup there Potoroo... I have self-flagellated and corrected the spelling to "arse".



29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Desktop General:

A lot of serious software I depend on has issues with Vista - Adobe's ColdFusion springs to mind.

And Vista is WAY too expensive - people whinged about OSX but Redmond can always be counted upon to go the next step.

My arse is my own for now thank you very much.


29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

Whatever benefits DirectX 10 provides in the graphics area, it loses those in the sound area.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Baked:

Ashton needs to re-think his articles abit more.....

4. Desktop search and search folders built in

Yep for the first time a search that is worth having for the PC just like google for the web. IT WORKS GREAT!


7. Better file navigation

The new folder structure and navigation is whats been lacking for many years in windows.


3. Up-to-date driver base and better driver handling on installation.

Having done a few installs of vista now i have to agree MS are finally getting things right.....not once have i had to install drivers to install vista......sure i'v installed nvidia and chipset drivers after install is done adn vista is already running.......but the point is vista was up and running straight away from the start.....no SATA / drive issues etc LOVE IT WD MS




Theres lots of reasons i love Vista already but these are the key ones.


ASHTON.......before posting a article diss'ing the biggest software launch ever to be realeased...how about doing a bit more research....AS EVERYTHING YOU POSTED WAS SAID 5-7yrs AGO ABOUT XP. OLD NEWS!!!







29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

"Face it: your arse belongs to Redmond."

This guy actually offers his arse to Redmond.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

A. Lizard:

with the Debian Etch Linux distribution.

What you typed is a pretty good description of my experience with getting my new GeForce 6100 AM2 motherboard running Nvidia.

I installed it and it worked immediately. While the driver that got me to a working desktop was a generic vesa video driver, installing the real Nvidia driver repackaged for my Linux distro was a boring, adventure-free process.

In fairness, I haven't been happy with the built-in search setup. But since beagle is known-good, I installed it and it's indexing my files right now.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

A. Lizard:

with the Debian Etch Linux distribution.

What you typed is a pretty good description of my experience with getting my new GeForce 6100 AM2 motherboard running Nvidia.

I installed it and it worked immediately. While the driver that got me to a working desktop was a generic vesa video driver, installing the real Nvidia driver repackaged for my Linux distro was a boring, adventure-free process.

In fairness, I haven't been happy with the built-in search setup. But since beagle is known-good, I installed it and it's indexing my files right now.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous 2:

Why would it be worth it to spend that much money on something that looks pretty and will let you search your computer better? And XP is well worth any work that it takes to get it running because it doesn't fail you once it starts running. I ran vista for 2 months and became annoyed by the ever constant security pop-ups and incompatability with any program I attempted to install. Once I reinstalled XP I noticed an immediate improvement of all aspects. I will not be going to vista any time soon.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

lubau (New user):

vista is complicated to use.....


18 October 2008, 2:11 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Azrael Nightwalker:

My arse belongs only to myself. Not to Redmond. Nor anyone else.
Today I use Linux, tomorrow I can use BSD or Solaris.
I am free to use anything I want, especially in the world of free software (free as in freedom).
So if use say that your arse belongs to Redmond then I am very sorry - have fun being their slave.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Satai:

It seems, that Leopard only missses new Direct X and the point 10 ("resistance is futile").

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

REDMOND... NO ONES ARSE BELONGS TO REDMOND. U FAT NERD GET OFF THE NET AND GET A REAL JOB

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC administrator:

Ehehe! Nice. Subtle, eloquent, well argued... possibly the best quality comment we've ever had here at APC. ;-)


29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

RickyZed20:

ha ha ha omg thats hilarious dude... you rock!

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ailahusky:

Maybe you don't know Bill like I do. 8P

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Robert:

There was nothing in that article that was a "must upgrade" for anyone.

#10 was just stupid. My arse belongs to Apple and OSX. Superior in almost every way.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Erik:

I cannot agree with your views, except points 9 and 10 all of these features have been in other operating systems for a few years now (osx, linux). However nobody actually switched to them for those reasons, so I can't think why they would be the reason to upgrade to vista.
I've read about some idea to have DX 10 run on xp through the wine project, if that would work (might take some time, but I can actually see this happening) point 9 is dismissed.
The sole reason to switch would be point 10 then, but on the other hand. When I go to the average people using their computer for email and photo stuff I know I could switch their XP to say Ubuntu without them really noticing.
The problem here is that MS owns not my arse but the arse of computer shops that offer no alternative to windows to the average customer...

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymouse:

Agreed. Mac OS X is the ONLY OS worth having.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous-:

If you like my first OS by fisher price.

29 February 2008, 8:38 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Remi:

Point 1 could have been built as a "One size fit (almost) all application". Point 2 could have been done a few years ago.
Point 3 could be part of a massive driver library. Point 4 could be done using Google Desktop.
Points 4 to 9 could have been built as part of XP SP3 instead of a new OS.
Point 10. I have a choice, flipping between Mac and XP for some Windows apps that I still can't find in Mac.


29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Forty:

What (w)indows apps can't be found on Mac? I got a Mac G5 less then a year ago and for the 1st time I am free from computer frustrations!!!

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mr. Wizard:

"I got a Mac G5 less then a year ago and for the 1st time I am free from computer frustrations!!!?"

Sure. When you have a overpriced toy computer made and marketed to appeal to simpletons, you can expect less frustration...but you paid too much for a pathetic excuse for a modern computer.

Seriously, if you are one of the many people who paid a premium for a Mac logo, only to run some flavor of Linux (and maybe dual booting with WinXP Pro at those times when you can't avoid dealing with the Micro$oft Monopoly(tm) ), why the heck didn't you just build (or order) a much better computer for far less money, like tech savvy computer enthusiasts and business owners who care about cost effectiveness have been doing for decades?

If you are a typical MacLuser, you don't know much about computers, and probably got suckered in by Apple's not-so-subtle "Macintosh == Computers for Dummies" marketing ploy. You may even buy into crap like "Macs are immune to viruses."

There is very little in the way of a valid, rational reason to buy a Mac these days, unless you actually like the flaunt the fact that you are willing to pay too much $$$ for too little computer.

In the 80s and 90s, there was a valid reason to buy a Mac and run MacOS if you were into publishing or did certain kinds of graphic artwork. These days, there is little (if anything) of consquence that you can do on a Mac that you can't do on more common, better supported, less proprietary plaforms, usually for far less money.


29 February 2008, 8:42 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Robert Surtees:

If you do some checking around you will soon discover that any Macintosh computer is cheaper than any PC that has the same capabilities, I'll admit that Apple don't have computers as cheap as some PCs but they are not as powerful. The best system for running Widows XP is a Mac Mini which will give you more power than any other similar PC

29 February 2008, 8:44 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous1:

Troll

29 February 2008, 8:44 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ryan mesler:

1. apple already did it
2. who cares. the average computer user doesn't do reinstalls of their operating system on a regular basis. when they do, it's off of a set of rescue discs that come with an IMAGE (OMG) of the factory installed operating system
3. wow? just-baked? as in bleeding ege? awesome! enjoy 19,500 drivers that may or may not work!
4. give me a freakin break. seriously? who cares.
5. congratulations microsoft!
6. they only did that because fidelity investments had to blame SOMEONE for their moronic VP that lost their laptop with hundreds of thousands of retirement accounts on it. is this really useful to the non-commercial, everyday user? not really.
7. honestly, almost half your reasons to switch to vista are for things that really aren't anything new.
8. apple already did it.
9. let's cross that bridge when we get to it.
10. wrong. commerical customers who have too much time and money already invested in microsoft have no choice. we, "the people", do.

your rebuttal is a joke, and it sickens me to think you make money doing this.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Frank:

Hi,
What I did not see in this argument is that not only will Microsoft charge top dollar for its product, it's also releasing it in 5 flavors, only one of which will actually have all the features.
Um... am I the only one who has a problem with that? Not only do I not want to buy a product that isn't fully featured by the design, I also don't want to be reminded every time I want to use the technology that should be there but isn't, that it would be a great idea for me to upgrade. And you know Microsoft is going to remind you again and again and again until you give in.

I don't think that's a polite way of doing things. I don't want to buy a half-assed product. When Apple charges some money to upgrade the system the outrage can be heard as far as Andromeda. Software development costs money, money somebody has to pay. I don't mind paying for software but Microsoft is going to charge money for buying the product and then it's going to whine about it not feeling great until I upgrade to the full version. At a price, of course.

My idea of a system is a tool that offers full featured functionality across the board at a decent price. Microsoft is starting to develop a system like car manufacturers produce cars: you can have a simple car for this much money, if you want the stuff that you actually wanted it's going to cost you n much more.

Thanks a lot, Microsoft.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

Nice list.

I wish though that people would stop saying OSX and Linux do this and that.
They don't.
They do equivalents, but not the same.
Especially Linux. Yes you can get open source this and that, but unless you are a techie, forget the support.

The main reasons why we buy Windows is:

A) because it comes with the PC we bought.
B) All the software I already own licenses for works on it and if I wish to upgrade that software, the upgrade is either cheaper than an alternative or I get real support for that software.
C) We all know how to use it. I've tried Linux once a year every year for the last 10 years. Every time I am unable to do something as easily as on Windows.
D) Yes you can run apps that let you play games but not at the speeds and frame rates as on... Yup... Windows.

I could go on, but I'm getting bored now.

Until the day Linux, OSX, etc can be PROPERLY compared to each other including support for them, Microsoft truly does own your rear end.
(I'm English, we're polite and do not say Ass or Arse)

Oh and a final point. Will people please stop typing M$! It immediately looks like you are employed to hate Microsoft and spread nastiness around about them. In effect, you ruin your own credability.


29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

Go ahead, take the plunge and replace your bloated PC apps with mac equivalents (or just use Parallels!)

I did this and the user experience is BEYOND COMPARE. Microsoft can ape some of the cool features of OSX but is totally incapable of turning out a well-integrated, well-thought-out, well-engineered experience.

Instead they leave it to the users to figure out how to salvage usefulness from the dumptruck full of disconnected parts they deliver.

Try this, then re-read your post; you will see how sheltered it sounds!

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous:

You've never used OS X as your primary system. 99% of these features are already available and are so easy to use you'll never go back to a PC/Windows based machine. I code html/php/java on a mac, design on a mac, and do all my personal functions: email, word, internet, audio etc in OS X...

My old PC collects dust and I no longer have to constantly buy new equipment and upgrade/spyware check or reload XP Pro every six months.

The biggest shock in switching to OSX is that you don't have 1000s of software titles to choose from because 80% of what you need is bundled into the OS and works better than the products you end up buying to supplement the OS on your PC.

Why else do you think Windows based it's design more or less on OSX?

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

serge:

the first game that comes to mind that i have needs an Nvidia Geforce 6 series graphics card or equivelant at least, guess what, as far as i know, Nvidia doesnt have the neccessary drivers for Vista to support Geforce 6

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anony Mouse:

Most of these 10 are usability features which we already have or expected to see back in 2000 (now it is too late).
1..7 - you gotta be kidding! I think you missed the graphical user interface and the mouse navigation "extra features" from the list.
8. sounds like a nice idea
As for 9. - this is exactly the reason why nobody would need Vista. Save up a bit more money and buy a game console.
10. Let's get back to this in 5 years time...


29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kill-9:

@Anony Mouse said -
"As for 9. - this is exactly the reason why nobody would need Vista. Save up a bit more money and buy a game console."

actually, consoles are actually cheaper than PCs in the longrun.

the xbox hit the market at $400 (USD) in 2001 and was replaced by the 360 in 2006, but not before the price dropped to $150, all the while playing every xbox game that hit the market.

try keeping a $400 (USD) PC around for 5 years, playing every game that comes out for it, without needing to buy more memory or a new video card, or downloading and installing new drivers.

29 February 2008, 8:36 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

View all comments (142)  

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags