Microsoft unlocks Windows Home Server

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

David Flynn30 March 2007, 5:11 AM

Family calendaring, remote TV recording, internet monitoring of security camera webcams ... Microsoft expects developers will add all this functionality to Windows Home Server through the new software development kit.


As momentum grows around its new Windows Home Server line, which is due for release towards the end of this year, Microsoft is looking to keep the love flowing with its hardware partners, software developers and end users alike.

Joel Sider, Senior Program Manager for Windows Home Server, told APC that the company intends to release a software development kit (SDK) for the platform early next month.

While already available to OEMs such as HP, which was the first to sign up to produce a Windows Home Server system, making the SDK available to all third-party developers should result in a wide range of add-on programs ranging from free utilities to commercial applications.

"One of the exciting things about home server is that it's Windows Server, it's an application platform, so we're expecting to see a lot of third-party applications" says Sider. "When we release the SDK and post the documentation on MSDN we'll be giving developers the means to start building Windows Home Server applications.

"This could include centralised family schedule management, or maybe some syncing capabilities so as you record your favourite TV shows on your media centre they're automatically going onto Home Server in a very easy hands-off way. You could also think about webcams and security applications".

As with Windows Server itself, Microsoft's focus would remain on adding "features and core functionality to the home server itself" says Sider, although he suggested that it would make sense for the platform to "work with the Live services we already have out there, (we could) make it really easy to take your content from Home Server and post to a blog".

HP is already developing a photo sharing application along similar lines for its Windows Home Server-powered Media Smart server. "Microsoft has done a lot of great work around storage elements and remote access but Windows Home Server is also a platform that people can buy software for to expand its functionality" says Josh Peterson, Product Manager at HP's Personal Storage Business group.

HP's MediaSmart home server: will include software to create and serve a password-protected online photo album to family and friendsHP's MediaSmart home server: will include software to create and serve a password-protected online photo album to family and friends
"We're writing a home server program which lets you create an online photo album, select the photos to publish and then serve up Web pages of photos, straight from the MediaSmart server, to family and friends. They get an email with a secure link to that album and they can browse and save photos and also order their own prints using SnapFish".

Sider says that Microsoft is also looking into a future role for Windows Home Server in home automation.

"We've had some people looking at the home builder shows and home builder software developers, and as that industry progresses towards more centralised home automation we're thinking about how home server can manage your lighting, your air conditioning and so on."

At this stage HP remains the only hardware manufacturer to have publicly announced products for Windows Home Server.

However, Taiwanese ODMs (Original Design Manufacturers) Quanta and Inventec have both demonstrated reference designs --Invertec's prototype is housed in a stylishly sculptured white mini-tower, while Quanta opted for the chassis of a conventional small form factor PC.

Sider suggests that several top-tier players are waiting in the wings. "There are no names I can reveal today but those you would guess are probably on the shortlist" -- a comment APC takes to mean established consumer PC companies already active in the small business server space, such as Acer and Dell.

Sider also indicated to APC that Microsoft was leaning towards making Windows Home Server available to end-users who want to build their own server, either from scratch or using an old desktop PC. This would be a welcome change from the earlier plans to restrict the code to Microsoft's home server hardware partners.

"There's no absolute final confirmation on that" cautions Sider, "but it's fair to say that we think it's the right approach to make it available to that enthusiast audience, to the do-it-yourselfers, so we're just fine-tuning that decision and working out how to do that, and hopefully we'll have confirmation on that soon."

While Windows Home Server has already hit Beta 2, Sider flagged that there'd "certainly be at least one more test version, either a beta or a release candidate. That test version will be even more publicly available and widely distributed (than the current Beta 2 edition), and then we'll RTM".


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Sanders:

I'm the only one that doesn't see the point of a home server plus many vista home versions?

MS is losing the plot here.

Who the hell needs this?

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

justthething84:

Buy a small item from a computer store such as some blank CDs and they can give you an OEM version of WINDOWS VISTA ULTIMATE for $250. That's a saving of $530. There is a shop near me that is doing this and I think it's an absoulte crack up.

The ONLY difference is that the OEM version does not come with the pretty box - but let's face it who cares about a box haha they aren't worth $530. Come on Microsoft is ripping the World off again!!!!!!

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

to quote the EULA

"4.1 We grant you a nonexclusive right to distribute an individual software license only with a fully assembled computer system. A "fully assembled computer system" means a computer system consisting of at least a central processing unit, a motherboard, a hard drive, a power supply, and a case."

The OEM deal is considerably tightened from what applied to XP

You cannot legally buy yourself an OEM copy, that doesn't say that there is not someone out there hungry enough to sell you one.

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

justthething84:

as you said that doesnt stop people from obtaining a copy for cheap :) so go ahead friends if you have the chance buy it for the price it's worth.

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tim:

The problem is that the only legal ways to aquire and use an OEM version of windows vista is

1) buy a computer with vista preloaded

2) buy a vista system builder single-pack and use it with a newly home-built PC (in other words be your own OEM!) - you can't just buy the OEM and install it on an old machine and have a valid license, although it should still activate...

The other downside is that you only get one version (32 or 64-bit) whereas the upgrade and full retail versions of Ultimate contain two discs.

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

It will be interesting seeing how close Microsoft can get to that promise of home server running on an old desktop. This suggestion is contrary to any MS development for the last decade, every product released by Microsoft has required major increases in hardware capability to run effectively.

Even many of the lean GUI-less optimised server builds are starting to require more than a PIII or early P4 to run effectively. I cannot see anything written by Microsoft and capable of multimedia sharing running effectively or even operable on that old desktop.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Peter Schoenthal:

I'm running a beta on an old P3 Celeron 1.3 Ghz with 512 MB RAM. It works excellent. All I did was upgrading the Harddisk to a 750 GByte.

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

running what? for how many, concurrently? elaborate please?

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jason Automatic:

Wouldn't flexible and robust web services mitigate the need for most features of the 'home server'. What about Live services? Microsoft would be better doing something innovative with peer-to-peer, a consumerised version of Groove maybe. Instead they want to put another PC running another licence of Windows in your home. If a pin-up feature of this product is secure online photo albums, Microsoft needs to consider just who will be purchasing it.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

-James:

I can't believe how short sighted some of you are. I jumped at the chance to join the beta abd I have successfully been using it on a 4-5 year old computer with minimal specs. For some one with 50 gigs of music and 40 gigs of photos this is a life saver and a huge leap in functionality.

Web services couldn't even touch the flexibility I have now, especially when it's in my network.

-James

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous1:

There are so many NAS devices that provide great functionality and the ability to share music and photos if that what you want. Setting up a server to do what these devices already do is a little off the cuff if you ask me. Then again to each his own I don't see the sense of licening another MS product if you don't have to.

One other issue with this is that people already have enough issues with their home computers and the majority of people have little knowlege to deal with them. Those that have some knowledge tend to creat more problems for themselves.

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

As much as Windows Home server underwhelms me and as far it is behind some of the other offerings it does offer a lot more than a NAS box.

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymouswhsuser:

Microsoft will be allowing for third party companies to add functionality to WHS so I see this as a very viable product. I have ejoyed the Beta testing and look forward to the final product.

As for minimum hardware and using old PC's, many people are running WHS using old hardware and it runs fine. I have 3 boxes running WHS, the slowest being an AMD K62-500 with 512megs and it runs fine. Of course if you want media sharing then you would run faster hardware, but thats on you not Microsoft.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags