Microsoft to skip "unlucky" Office 13

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

David Flynn29 March 2007, 12:26 AM

Microsoft is showing a just a touch ofTriskaidekaphobiaand will skip Office 13 and instead start work straight on Office 14 now that Office 2007 is out the door.


We're sure that Microsoft's massive Office team had a few days off once Office 2007 was signed off and sent for DVD duplication, but they're now well underway shaping the next version of Office suite.

Right now it's just called Office 14 - Microsoft has long eschewed fancy codenames for the Office suite, instead favouring the simpler version number of each release. Office 2007 was officially version 12 of the suite, so next up should be Office 13, "but that's is an unlucky number so we're going to skip Office 13 and call the next one Office 14" says Jensen Harris, Group Program Manager for Microsoft's Office User Experience Team and the man behind the radical ribbon interface of Office 2007.

"Our job isn't done here (with Office 2007), we still have some tricks up out sleeve" according to Harris, who says the team is "in the early stages of planning the next version of Office."

"We're currently immersed in that early and very creative part of the product cycle. We're looking at the customer feedback that we're starting to get from real people going to the store and buying Office 2007, and also from our corporate customers, and also just thinking about what problems we have left in the user experience."

Among those issues in Office 2007 is the inconsistency between applications when it comes to the revised interface. Only Word, Excel, PowerPoint and the messaging window of Outlook use the ribbon, known officially known as the ‘Fluent' interface.

"One of the things that everyone asks is if we will be moving Fluent to more of the programs in Office 14. We didn't implement the Ribbon in Publisher 2007, or the main application window in Outlook 2007, and that's certainly something that we're considering very strongly.

"I think it's fair to say that we're going to evaluate every single program in Office and see whether (Fluent) makes sense or not, and whether it's the right step for that program to take. But undoubtedly we'll see more of the Fluent UI in Office in the future, and maybe even elsewhere at Microsoft."

At this early stage there are no specific details on what's being tossed into the Office 14 mix, although speaking at last year's Software 2006 conflab, Microsoft corporate vice president Simon Witts spoke of Office 14 focussing on "role-based productivity."

"We'll have one for sales, R&D and HR, for example. You can start to imagine a world of Office as a business application platform" Witts said.

Other bullet-points from early Office 14 presentations use the same broad headings as could have been pulled from any Office slideshow over the past decade: think "Enterprise Content Management", "Communication and Collaboration" and "Business Process and Business Intelligence".

Ho-hum. We'd much rather see a heading like "Office Online" with a set of hosted Internet versions of the core Office applications, or at the very least a chunk of online storage where you can not only store and sync selected documents but also personalised settings that are applied to whatever local version of Offce you're using. And we'd rather not have to wait until 2009 to see it.

What would you like to see in Office 14?

David Flynn visited Microsoft's US campus courtesy of Microsoft Australia.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

old_misery:

Imagine the havoc unlucky Microsoft software would wreck.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Neil:

It's so ironic when a multi-billion-dollar technology corporation, built on the numbers zero and one, is still forced to pander to ridiculous beliefs about certain "unlucky" numbers to ensure product acceptance.

When are human beings ever going to grow up?

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous User:

You realize, though, that they might not be superstitious? Just like any company, they want to make the most money possible. If they call it Office 13, many people might be hesitant to buy it, losing the company money.

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

David Flynn:

Actually, I reckon their given reason is a bit tongue-in-cheek, especially as the finished product would not be called 'Office 13' but Office 2010 or such (I mean, how many of us would know what 'real' version of Office we were running,not the year-based marketing moniker?).

No, I think the real reason behind this is that if they make it '13' then they're giving a free kick, a superb irresistible headline, to any mag or blog or reviewer (especially in the tech press and/or the product's  lengthy beta cycle)... not just with regard to any problems they uncover, but even if the suite isn't as revolutionary as Office 2007, writers will still play with 13 being Office's unlucky number due to potential lack of upgrades etc etc... so they're just going to do a little 'pro-active spin management' and remove that from the equation!



29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Bad luck:

Beneath this move there's a fear of the number 13. That if the fear that superticious clients don't buy office 13. So we skip that and make it more money err... USER friendly!

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Martin Gifford:

I'm using the Word 2007 trial. Here are the problems I have noticed so far that the next version should fix:

1. You can't turn off autocomplete. It's like a popup ad. If you type Ramesh Sund, for example, at the end of a heading and press enter you get Ramesh Sunday. It seems to work on month-names and day-names.

2. You can't remove or move the ribbon menu bar.

3. You can only have the quick access toolbar in one of two bad positions - taking up the most important area of the screen i.e. the top.

4. The quick access toolbar only has one line, and after that you get a little arrow at the end to get to the rest of your buttons.

5. You can only have one quick access toolbar.

6. The help menu is worse than ever.

7. There's now a bar at the top of document map taking up space where two headings used to go.

8. There's a bug that causes the a style to apply itself to one word instead of the whole paragraph.

9. Adding buttons to the quick access toolbar is difficult because the lists of choices are not longer categorised sensibly. Now you have "popular" and "not on the ribbon". The ones that you want are probably not on the ribbon, and when you go there you find a huge list with many repetitions of features giving differing results.

10. Darkly coloured buttons in the quick access toolbar disappear into the black colour scheme.

11. Repagination doesn't work properly in Draft view.

And I could go on.

The main issue MS have ignored is that if you have a small laptop with a horizontal screen, important space is taken up at the top of the screen by the quick access toolbar, the ribbon menu bar (and the ribbon if you want to use that), and by the heading bar of the document map.

And your options to customise have nearly all been taken away. How can removing such an important Windows feature as customisation be an improvement? I used to customise it to have no menus and one floating toolbar full of everything I need so that I had maximum screen space, but now that option is gone. The whole ribbon thing feels like a gate blocking features rather than a door opening up features.

I find this upgrade to be bizarre on so many levels. I cannot imagine businesses being happy. People say you should learn it because it will be the future, but I can imagine kids going to job interviews into the future with their shiny new Office 2007 knowledge and being asked, "Can you use Office 2003, or Office 2002, or Office 2000?"

This realease feels like an experiment, which is unfair for long time users.

Martin Gifford.


29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous2:

Martin, I'm sure you've figured this out by now, but clicking the tab at the top of any part of the ribbon will hide it. When you need to use it, click the tab you need and it will pop down.

29 February 2008, 8:41 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Viper5 (New user):

Office 14 needs to be compatible with it's previous version for migration. We have/are having so many quirks with the new office – mainly Excel & Word so far… 13's my lucky number!

15 July 2008, 8:25 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags