$63 an inch but worth every penny: Dell U3011 review

Lindsay Handmer
01 April 2011, 10:00 AM


The latest version of an already legendary monitor, but be warned: once you've used this you can never go back...


Anyone who has used a massive computer screen knows it’s oh so hard to go back to something smaller. And that’s why we recommend you don’t test the 30in Dell U3011 unless you have $1,899 lying around. Trust us: that once huge 22in screen will never look the same.

Unlike some of the smaller Dell LCDs, the U3011 is overly utilitarian - almost ugly. It’s boxy, thick and very, very plain. Fortunately, you won’t care one iota once you turn it on and bask in the 2,560 x 1,600 resolution and vibrant colours. Aside from the massive screen space, the U3011 is all about image quality, with a 10-bit panel providing 1.07 billion colours. It also comes with a factory colour calibration report and is aimed at people who are willing to tweak the settings to their use and environment.



The matte screen on the Dell is great at avoiding reflections, making it a good choice even in your natural light-filled workspace. On the flip side, deep blacks and no visible light bleed make this monitor equally well suited to dark areas. The 7ms response time might seem a little low, but we couldn’t detect any ghosting during gaming or movie playback.

The Dell has a touch-sensitive control interface that is accurate and pleasant to use. On the downside, it can be a pain to navigate to some of the more advanced adjustments.

You also get a host of other options. The stand provides height adjustment plus tilt and swivel, though no portrait mode. Connectivity wise, you get DisplayPort plus dual HDMI, dual DVI, VGA and Component connections. The Dell also features a picture-in-picture mode using the HDMI or Component inputs. Four USB ports, a card reader plus 3.5mm 5.1 surround sound output jacks are also included.

At $63 an inch the Dell is expensive but at the same time it’s also pretty good value, with most comparable 30in displays costing significantly more. You will need to keep some money spare for your power bill though, with the huge Dell averaging 92W during normal use – more than the computer running it.

Available from Dell, retailing for $1,899.
APC rating: 8/10 (Highly Recommended)


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

ss-rotel (User):

I want!

And the responce time thing, it's cos of all the colours. if you droped it back to an 8bit panel with the same spec, you would have a sub 3ms panel, (educated guess)

01 April 2011, 12:54 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

domenico (New user):

is this a joke?
if yet, a good one!
hahaha

01 April 2011, 6:03 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

domenico (New user):

http://bit.ly/fimfQc

01 April 2011, 6:03 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

JGrant (New user):

The problem with such a high resolution is even 1080p games are going to not look great since they won't be at the native res, probably best to play windowed in my opinion. On the other side, it will be great for photo-editing if you're too lazy to zoom in.

02 April 2011, 10:06 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

I Geek and I Vote (New user):

These high-end 30" monitors are great but it is about time we saw some mid-range 27" to 30" monitors (2560 x 1440 pixels mimimum) from the likes of Samsung, LG, BenQ and ASUS at prices more accessible to home users.

There does not seem to have been much development in monitors for quite a few years with manufacturers happy to churn out some very poor quality 1920 x 1080 monitors.
Consequently, Dell, HP and Apple have the market to themselves.

03 April 2011, 7:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AlexF (New user):

This monitor is ~100dpi, pretty much standard dpi (96). So, with this monitor, it's all about quantity (big screen with fat dots), not quality (dpi).
Also, when a monitor gets too big, eyes need to wonder too much about the screen, causing tiredness. Keep away from big monitors, and instead get smaller but higher density monitor.

06 April 2011, 11:03 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user