About our new look!

warned
26 March 2008, 1:29 PM


Welcome to the new APCmag.com! It’s finally here – after about 18 months of planning and development, we’re pleased to launch a site that incorporates many of your requests.


Some of the new features:

  • Live discussion forums – your posts go straight online, for rapid-fire chat, not slowed-down by moderation. (Posts are still subjected to automated spam filtering and some posts will be bumped to a manual moderation queue if they look like they may breach our comment guidelines.)
  • A huge review section – we heard you loud and clear: you read APC because we independently test the stuff you’re going to be laying down your hard earned cash on. So now, reviews will go live to our website first, with a much broader scope than we could cover in the magazine, thanks to the fact that we’re not limited by page space online.
  • Email alerts and RSS everywhere – now you can subscribe to any part of APCmag.com through an RSS reader, or register to get email alerts as new content is published. It’s right throughout the site – not just a front-page article feed. For example, you can subscribe to all the posts written by a certain user. Or you can subscribe to a feed of stories only about ultraportable notebooks. Or you can subscribe to all comments posted in a certain discussion thread.
  • Equal focus on reader contributions – you can now upload a picture and information about yourself into your user profile. We totally realise that the community is what make a tech website hum (and differentiates it from every other anonymous blog site out there.) This is, of course, just the beginning of our social networking features. We’re not aiming to become a competitor to Facebook, but on the other hand, we think there’s a lot we can do to bring together the Australian tech community.
  • Popular content – we have lists of the most popular articles, forum threads and user comments all over the site to make it easy to discover stuff other readers have found interesting. With thousands of articles on the site, we realise it was getting harder on our old site to find older but still interesting articles.
  • Easy submit to news aggregators – we read Digg and Slashdot every day and want to make it as easy as possible for you to submit items of interest. So, Digg and Slashdot submit links are everywhere – right down to individual comments in forum threads.And this is just the beginning… we have an extensive blueprint for the site that will add many more major sections and features.

What about bugs?

This site isn’t based on any off-the-shelf software – it has been mostly built from scratch, so although we’ve had a long beta test we do expect there are still bugs left in the code. (Our development team is still working fast and furiously on fixing the list of bugs we know about, and we think we’ve squashed all the ones that affect site use day-to-day).

If you do find bugs, we definitely want to hear about them so we can fix them and keep the community up-to-date on what’s happening with them. See our “how to report bugs” forum thread.

Got suggestions?

We’re also keen to hear your feedback on the new site and what features you’d like to see implemented. Please feel free to email the APC team, any time. The site editor is Dan Warne – dwarne@acpmagazines.com.au.

If you have a specific problem with the website that you don’t want to post in the forums, it’s better to email apcwebproblem@acpmagazines.com.au as that is our workflow-managed mailbox for bugs (it forwards straight through to Dan as well as key APC dev team and management people).

About APC / Contacting us

Find out more about APC, or how to contact us.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Zarneth (New user):

Took me a while to realise what site I was looking at. The front page just looks like an advert page to me.

Plus. what's this "displayed email" required in registering? I don't mind my email being accessible but having it right there for easy spam harvesting?

26 March 2008, 6:08 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

Good feedback on the compulsory "displayed email" requirement. We'll look at revising that functionality ASAP so you can choose not to display an email address. (The thinking around it was to give logged-in users a way of contacting each other since this revision of the site doesn't have private messaging, however you've made a good point -- some people may simply not want to display an email address.)

26 March 2008, 9:19 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Zarneth (New user):

Something's weirdly wrong with this site. Very slow. Link in the registration email doesn't work. Oh and go to http://www.apcmag.com without the AU takes you to the old site.

26 March 2008, 6:08 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

Yes, the slowness is a problem we're aware of and our development team is working on resolving. It's a complex problem so we may not have a fix right away -- but we are identifying various issues that are contributing to the overall slowness and fixing them one by one, so thanks for your patience.

Re: the site appearing on one domain but not the other, that's just the nature of DNS propagation. We updated our IP address in our domain records for all our domains at the same time, but the changes need to spread across all the ISPs' DNS servers, and some will update quicker than others, as will certain domains propagate faster than others.

26 March 2008, 8:57 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

And to follow up on your other point about the link in the registration email not working -- we're aware of that problem too. For now, you can cut and paste the link into your web browser (far from ideal, we realise!) We hope to have this sorted out in the next couple of days.

26 March 2008, 9:08 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Zarneth (New user):

I've gotten 17 seperate email alerts of new comments posted on this topic now too. Including notifications of my own latter posts. All at once 24 hours later. You'll definitely want something to limit the reply emails there, Either to once per day or once per visit. Even then maybe deselect the email alerts option by default too.

I know from experience coding a website is incredibly complex but still....

27 March 2008, 6:30 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ciochina Gabriel (New user):

heh :) great job APC! At first, i thought i clicked the wrong bookmark!i must say, it looks great!

26 March 2008, 10:09 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

lifer (New user):

site is REALLY slow

fyi the poll doesn't add upto 100%

22%
21%
17%
20%
3%
2%
3%
4%
1%
9%
= 102%

27 March 2008, 4:43 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

Have responded to your post about this in the forums...
http://apcmag.com/forum.htm?g=posts&t=149#357

27 March 2008, 5:28 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

lifer (New user):

when i tried to add the comment here before the button didn't work (or so i thought as it didn't give any feedback)

27 March 2008, 6:33 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

Well, we are working very hard on making the site run faster, so hopefully you will no longer feel that the old site was "faster". As for "better", I guess that's up to interpretation and personal taste. However, I think the new features we've added -- a big review database and forums -- will end up being helpful to most people at some point.

27 March 2008, 9:44 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

bdude (New user):

I like the new design, although it would have been good to redirect your old RSS feed to the new one, I was wondering why you weren't publishing any updates.

28 March 2008, 12:16 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

That's in as a request with our dev team.

28 March 2008, 12:27 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Shannon (New user):

Give me the old site back. It was much quicker and easier to get around. The home page seems to be a bit of a mess. The old site was realy simple to use and it didnt have the clutter of the new site. If it ain't broke don't fix it, or more like you shouldn't change for the sake of change.

28 March 2008, 2:15 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

SteveC (New user):

I like the new design - BUT it takes forever to load?

28 March 2008, 6:03 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

SnapCount (New user):

I havent been here for a few days.. then when i popped in i was like.... "hmmmmm.. ok... this is different... wheres my news!"

I really like the new site, but it is a bit slow to load :(

29 March 2008, 2:23 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

The news is all still there! If you don't like our new homepage, you can bookmark our news section as your homepage -- it's very similar to our old homepage. Click the "news" tab in the top navigation menu to get there.

11 April 2008, 12:14 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Gah! You stuffed it all up again!
I've just had to sign up for the 3rd time in 2 years, and only found out about the change after I decided to check the site manually when my RSS feeds still showed the same stuff from about a week ago.

New look sucks, BTW. Very hard to follow.
And the login/account boxes are very slow.

31 March 2008, 1:57 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Gah! You stuffed it all up again!
I've just had to sign up for the 3rd time in 2 years, and only found out about the change after I decided to check the site manually when my RSS feeds still showed the same stuff from about a week ago.

New look sucks, BTW. Very hard to follow.
And the login/account boxes are very slow.

31 March 2008, 1:57 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

WTF!?!?
Why was this done without warning? I finally gave in and loaded the APC website after a week with no change in RSS... Only to find the damn site was all updated.

And I had to sign up for the 3rd time in about 2 years!

31 March 2008, 1:57 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

In general, the site's stuffed now.
I get a 500 error trying to post half the time.

31 March 2008, 1:59 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

OK, so far I've found:
* HTTP500 errors that seem to not cancel a post (which it doesn't tell you so you try again 4 or 5 times).
* Slow
* Clunky interface that rivals those of 1980's custom enterprise systems (complete with things breaking if you take even the slightest deviation from the "correct" path).
* No PNG support for user images! What is this? The 80's? And no error reported when supplying "invalid" data.
* No duplicate post prevention, as I think will be obvious from my last posts on this topic.
* Harder to read than before. Not sure if the font changed, or just the big empty left side is distracting.
* MSN ad at the top is WAAAAAYYYY too big. Have to scroll down to get to the actual article if you run at smaller window sizes.
* Black sides are distracting with white page content.
* Seems to be no option for not having email alerts by default.
* Seems to be no option to stay logged in.

Surely a system 18 months in development would be better than this... Or has APC been using thedailywtf.com as a way to learn how to be more Enterprisey?

31 March 2008, 2:47 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

James (New user):

Wow 'Tin' you sure have a lot to say about the website... Yes things may not be perfect yet, but it takes a lot of time and effort to design a site this big (being a web designer myself I understand!). As for no PNGs for user images, is it really a huge problem? Just use a JPEG image for god sake!
Aah that feels better.

03 April 2008, 12:11 AM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Took me 3 tries to figure out why it was silently rejecting the image though. If you're not going to accept common image types, at least say that instead of just making users guess.

11 April 2008, 1:29 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

Thanks Tin -- have logged this as a bug for resolution with the developers.

11 April 2008, 1:38 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Potoroo (User):

For the first time in over ten years the APC home page is no longer my home page. It is ridiculously overloaded. It took 72 seconds today from black to something readable on the screen, and 155 seconds to get the lot. Yes, you completely ignored the many people still on dialup.

Whatever happened to KISS? Simplicity was once a virtue. The one thing you should never do is put everything on the home page. That is bad design regardless of how much bandwidth users have. A good home page is a simple, clean and uncluttered. I know that has never been the ninemsn philosophy, which is why I avoid ninemsn like the plague, but surely APC should know better. Obviously not.

05 May 2008, 1:38 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

Potoroo -- really appreciate the feedback. You're right in saying that the pages are slow to load on dialup -- but that decision was made early along in the design process, because our server stats showed that the very great majority of readers are now on broadband (and while we realised this would inconvenience some readers on dialup, we figured that if there's any group of readers likely to move to broadband in the near future, it's APC readers.) Other popular websites are heading in the same direction -- the page size of SMH's home page, for example, is about the same. All that said, we're definitely listening to what readers have to say about the design and we're prepared to make changes where suggested improvements seem logical. For example, we're open to the idea of taking some stuff off the homepage and we're looking at what might be kept/removed.

05 May 2008, 1:47 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Potoroo (User):

The Edit function is borked too. 500 error.

05 May 2008, 1:47 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Yep. There's a number of mentions of that one. If I was APC I'd be firing whoever is meant to be maintaining it, because the list of bugs is growing and it seems nothing is being fixed.

05 May 2008, 2:25 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

Yes, our developers know that fixing bugs is a top priority and they have allocated more resources to it from today onwards.

05 May 2008, 2:59 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

Thanks for letting us know -- we're getting that fixed today.

05 May 2008, 2:57 PM (5 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

stu (New user):

yes well.. you gave the nice glossy web2 designers a job to do, but I thought you were a paper-based magazine too. But I'd barely guess that from the website. What happened to the 'in this issue' to tease us while we wait for the actual magazine to arrive in NZ? Ah - I see. It comes up further into the site. Is that intended behaviour?
And random comments on the visuals - too many scroll bars all over the place (possibly hints at trying to get too much on a page) - even to the extent that on the home page (in firefox 2 winxp2) I see an extra vertical scrollbar, and the killer, a horizontal scrollbar (and I'm viewing on a widescreen laptop.
I also see some objects jumping around when I scroll down - main offender being the slashdot and digg objects further up this page.
My impression? Someone had the bright idea that apcmag.com had to look web2 and so dumped every web2 'feature' onto the redesign, then tried to think how to add some content into it.
Harsh yes, but I dislike this site now. It mindlessly 'celebrates' web2 in the same way that some of the mags writers unquestioningly plug apple products because they look so sexy. A better match of gloss and functionality please.

02 July 2008, 9:35 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

richatadi (New user):

I currently have a vista system with a secondary partition that contains a recovery utility of about 6 MB on a 10 MB part. Vista is on a 320MB part., but is trashed. I would like to split the vista part. in half and then reformat the 2 drives. Then install my old XP pro, then vista. I have heard that XP on a vista sys. is never fully released, especially when running programs like AutoCad. Is this a feasible/simple way to do this?

17 November 2009, 1:15 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raghav (New user):

want t oru nwindows 7 with windows xp with windows 7 installed first

29 January 2010, 7:19 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

c5fusion (New user):

Help, my PC has stopped working. I went to fire it up and ...nothing except the fan. Fan runs constantly as soon as mains power is connected and pwr (on/off)does nothing. Have tryed changing ram slots, checked leads and connections, and reseated cpu. Any suggestions. c5

15 September 2011, 3:52 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

J876 (User):

To: Dan Warne

Dear Dan,

Can you please arrange to get a mobile version of the site up an running so its easier to read on a phone?

06 December 2011, 3:02 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user