Adobe Lightroom beta hits the net

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

Lachlan Grant24 July 2006, 9:50 AM

Ask any PC dabbler. They inevitably want Windows, Office and 'Adobe Photoshop because they have a digital camera'. WTF?! Don't get me wrong, Photoshop is a fantastic power-tool, but dude, it's like, $1100, and you wouldn't want to pirate software right? Adobe has answered our prayers with Lightroom.


Ask any PC dabbler. They inevitably want Windows, Office and “Adobe Photoshop because they have a digital camera”. WTF?!?! Don’t get me wrong, Photoshop is a fantastic power-tool for playing with photography, but for importing, collating and retouching your digital photos, it’s overkill.

Surely a proper image collection management tool would be much simpler. And as if my mind is directly plugged into that of Adobe CEO Bruce Chizen, I arrived at work this morning to find beta 3 release of Adobe Lightroom for Windows had hit the net.

If Adobe Photoshop is designed for the image guru, then Lightroom is designed perfectly for the photographer. This cool tool comes with a simple, dark user interface (think Kai’s Power Tools) so it's easier to focus on the image you're working on, rather than a clutter of panels and toolbars fighting for space on your desktop.

A quick spin about its features and benefits reveals that it’s not just for the novice, but includes many tools for refining and editing images, which pros will appreciate too.

It easily imports the images into its library, catalogues and tags them, then displays them in a neat filmstrip down the bottom, grid view, zoomed view, or loupe view… and pretty much any other view you’ll need.

From the Library view, a handy Quick Develop panel lets you adjust exposure, brightness, contrast and saturation amongst other things, with the aid of a histogram.

Swapping to Develop mode shows a much more detailed set of editing panels and tools to play with.

Slideshow mode lets you create slideshow animation (currently only exports to PDF) with text, ratings and metadata; and Print mode features a detailed set of panels for printing your photos.

For those who just can’t do without Photoshop, a click of a button throws you into Photoshop with your selected image so you can feel right at home.

The beta for Mac has been out for public download for quite some time, however the new beta release also has a download for Windows. You can check them both out here.

Adobe Lightroom beta 3 - Print

Adobe Lightroom beta 3 - Library

Adobe Lightroom beta 3 - Slideshow

Adobe Lightroom beta 3 - Library


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tim Melgrave:

I use Photoshop on every PC I have. But you're right, there's no way I'd pay $1100 for it. It's the Microsoft Office of image editors... they should give the public a volume discount after all this time.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

clippy:

Good one - yeah I have poeple who don't know much about PCs asking for for Photoshop, and I try to explain they'd find it hard to get their head around how to use it. I'll recommend they check this out. thanks Mr Grant.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Peter T:

I find mosst people with digital cameras require little functionality and I find The GIMP (which is free) does everything needed - and more.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Guy:

Sorry mate but I think you're way off on this one. You make it sound like Lightroom is the answer for the casual photographer who just needs a simple image editing app. That couldn't be more wrong - it's actually targeted at professional photographers and billed as an end-to-end workflow application, mainly for RAW files.

How many casual photographers out there with happy-snap digital cameras even know what a RAW file is?

As for cost, I don't think you're going to do better than Google's Picasa (free) or even the inexpensive Photoshop Elements. I reckon Lightroom will set you back a few hundred dollars at the very least.

Personally I'm looking forward to Lightoom as a real complement to Photoshop, but it's not going to be a tool for the casual photographer that's for sure.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Not so:

I definely agree with Guy and what he said.
everything he said was true!
As for Peter T with what he said, the gimp is fine for a bit of light work, but it's not really all that great for most image editing, as it does blurr most photos more than good image editing programs such as photoshop and fireworks.


I'm also looking forward to lightroom, and as Guy said it's NOT going to be a tool for the casual photographer for SURE.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

arebangdu:

I just use Paint.net
Free and good for "most" tasks

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags