Linux use booming in global recession

John Carl Villanueva
19 March 2009, 12:00 PM


Businesses are turning to Linux en masse as they face massive budget cuts driven by the economic crisis, according to a new report.


When the global economic crisis unfolded last year, Linux advocates were quick to predict the rise of their favorite operating system.

However, these arguments were met by seemingly logical counter-arguments that foresaw otherwise. One of them even went as far as predicting the downfall of open-source projects.

Well, contrasting forecasts like these can be treated in equal footing until the numbers finally come out.

This month, some numbers finally came out and have been basically favouring Linux.

In a recent global survey conducted by IDC (but sponsored by Linux vendor Novell), results have revealed how IT decision makers feel about a Linux adoption in their organizations in the midst of the global recession. A white paper entitled "Linux Adoption in A Global Recession" summarized the results of the survey.

A glimpse of the white paper's introduction reveals a clear indication of what most CIO's, IT Directors, IT Managers, IT Staff, IT Consultants and the like, who were the usual respondents of the survey, thought of the adoptation concept. The introduction states:

"Economic downturns have a tendency to accelerate emerging technologies, boost the adoption of effective solutions, and punish solutions that are not cost competitive or that are out of synch with industry trends.

"IDC research finds that Linux users are clearly satisfied about their choice to deploy Linux, and during trying economic times, the potential for those same customers to ramp up their deployment of Linux is strong"


Among the 330 organizations surveyed, those from Asia Pacific appeared the most aggressive in increasing Linux adoption. Of the 134 respondents coming from the region, 73% expressed interest in increasing adoption on server deployments and 70% expressed interest in increasing adoption on clients.

For comparison, 53% of the total number of respondents expressed interest in increasing adoption on server deployments and 48% expressed interest in increasing adoption on client deployments.

This interest in Linux adoption, according to IDC, stems from the fact that while most organizations aim to reduce spending because of the the economic downturn, they don't have the intention of implementing a directly proportonal reduction in deployments. In order to achieve this, they turn to Linux and its low-cost nature.

The respondents also indicated that the top 2 reasons that would enable them to accelerate new deployments of Linux would be cost reduction and stronger interoperability with Windows and other operating systems.

This raises the interesting question: Will Microsoft try to stick to its guns and promote the value of its product and service ecosystem against 'free' Linux in tough times, or will it discount to retain market share, as it has done with Windows on netbooks?

Despite all of its successes during the global recession as revealed by the research, the study did not fail to recognize the fact that Windows stood in the way of Linux's long-term growth potential; i.e., beyond the economic crisis.

In fact, Windows is still identified as the platform holding the majority position on both PCs and the x86 server hardware, one of the architectures where Linux has strongly benefited due to the crisis.bull

A free downloadable copy is available for those who are interested in viewing the IDC white paper.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Raindog (New user):

It an interesting set of data.

What I am experiencing is clients wishing to extend the life cycles of their IT investment. But in doing so the do not wish to remain static or to fall behind.

There is not a mass exodus to abandon Windows but a growing resistance to being driven into perpetual version upgrade cycles. Very cost effective Linux servers and existing desktops are a favoured combination.

Interoperability is the big push. Support for legacy hardware and ability to integrate with other systems. Linux is arguably the leader on a combination of that criteria. Interesting times.

19 March 2009, 1:22 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

djsflynn (APC staff):

I'd be surprised if a report paid for by Novell suggested anything other than Linux = good. And I bet that if Microsoft sponsored a similar report then shock horror, we'd be hearing the exact same happy tunes about the Windows platform.


19 March 2009, 3:10 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting djsflynn:
Novell suggested Linux = good. + Microsoft = the exact same happy tunes about the Windows platform.

Would probably leave the truth somewhere in the middle? Unhindered interoperability has to remain near the top of most customer wish lists.




19 March 2009, 3:37 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Your Average Joe (User):

What a lot of pie-in-the-sky reportage this is !

So let me get this straight, a Novell sponsored survey suggests that there are over 70% of polled corporations showing interest in moving to Linux ?

LOL

Interest does not equate to deployment. We'll wait and see when this 'slight' dip in the share markets recovers just how many of those surveyed actually goes over to open source !

Viva La Revolucion ! ........................ Again !

19 March 2009, 5:23 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting Your Average Joe:
this 'slight' dip in the share markets

Slight dip? A market crash with dimension not unlike the great depression. What was WWII a skirmish?


Quoting Your Average Joe:
just how many of those surveyed actually goes over to open source

Perhaps you should ponder just how many already deploy some open source solutions today.



19 March 2009, 5:33 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Halcon (User):

Amazing!
Linux as free alternative to Microsoft Windows juggernaut is favoured by companies that feel the economy pinch, while not feature rich as the opponent in some areas, Linux can appeal people with limited budget.
As the economy is looming to bad times ahead, is time to tightening the belt and be savvy.
The Novell report is more credible than the big mouthed lies of the Microsoft PR puppets, I for one don't think Microsoft will be scared to know the fractured reality.
But if they want to play dirty, to stay afloat, the only game is to create a campaign of scaremongering to tell everyone to not use Linux but MS Windows instead.
I doubt there will be a price reduction or a better conditions in the EULA, as this company has become more and more greedy than ever!

19 March 2009, 6:51 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AndyCee (New user):

Wow. 26 comments and only 3 bringing anything to the discussion.

20 March 2009, 10:12 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

I count 4 plus a couple of good humoured ones. Either way, its a sad indictment, with your comment and my reply here not helping thing stay on topic either.

With a little luck the distractions will soon be gone.

20 March 2009, 11:23 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Alex'd (New user):

All very well, but the report is missing the bottom line - TCO. There's more than enough material on lower TCO for Windows clients (in today's end user environment), and lower TCO for Linux servers -- but where's the middle ground? We run all our application servers on Debian, while our ~40 clients are managed from a Server 2003 VM, and we'd like to switch over to all Linux or all MS servers. Forget these Novell sponsored whitepapers or MS-powered smear campaigns - give us some useful info already.

22 March 2009, 5:50 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

It seem you've already worked out your own TCO, although that may well not apply universally for other organisations.

What middle ground are you referring to? The Windows boxes/Linux servers suits many of us, but with tough time that TCO equation can change.

It's hard (but not impossible) to move a desktop workforce onto say an Open Office configuration, even if typical usage is more than adequately catered for.
And in tough times a Linux server that (arguably) functionally replaces MS Exchange and say Small Business server is a mighty attractive proposition.

To say Linux uptake is booming due to global recession may at this date be an exaggeration, but there is no escaping Linux uptake will prosper in hard financial times.



22 March 2009, 6:58 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user