ADSL2+ is not the answer: why we still desperately need FttN

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

David Braue07 February 2008, 4:35 AM

It's well and good that Telstra has switched on ADSL2+ for 2.5 million homes, but thousands of people will discover they are still getting slow speeds despite paying premium rates for the new service. Here's why fibre is the only solution.


Telstra may finally be switching on its ADSL2+ services in over 900 exchanges around the country, but it had better be ready to handle the legions of disappointed customers who will find out that just because they’re paying for ADSL2+, doesn’t mean they’re getting it.

The surprise announcement, which ended more than a year in which Telstra had flat-out refused to turn on the ADSL2+ equipment it had installed, was hailed by responsible minister Stephen Conroy as a step forward for Australian broadband – and it is, as long as there’s less than about a kilometre of wire between you and your local Telstra exchange.

Note that I’m talking about wire, not distance; telecommunications cabling snakes its way under the streets and the actual length of the wire to your house can be nearly twice the physical distance.

This translates into ADSL2+ signal attenuation that means just one thing you need to care about: while Telstra will potentially be providing (and charging) more than 2 million homes for 20Mbps services, many of those will be limping along at a tenth of the speed.

My house, in a densely populated area 13km outside of Melbourne, is around 3km from the exchange but apparently has more than 4km of wiring (you can check your own situation, along with an estimate of the ADSL2+ speeds you can expect, at www.adsl2exchanges.com.au .

Throw in the usual spaghetti of in-house phone wiring, and I was welcomed to the world of ADSL2+ with speeds of just 1.5Mbps; moving to another phone outlet in the house, I was cruising along at a blistering 800Kbps – that’s 0.8Mbps.

After much swearing, reconfiguration, technical support calling, and dusty crawling around the roof, I found and disconnected an errant phone line that, it seems, was introducing interference into the connection.

I know this because speeds jumped – all the way to 2.9Mbps. If that doesn’t sound like ADSL2+ to you, well, you’re thinking like I am. And I’m thinking that while Telstra has done something good by turning on these DSLAMs, it’s only the beginning – and not the end, as was suggested by Internode head Simon Hackett in response to the announcement.

Widespread ADSL2+, Hackett reasoned, would obviate the need for a fibre-to-the-node network as it becomes more widespread. But given my own experiences, I think ADSL2+ is just going to be a toe in the water; my own service would become far faster if there were a fibre-equipped node on a nearby street corner – which would mean my signal wouldn’t have time to attenuate over a few hundred metres to the local node.

In the meantime, new ADSL2+ customers expecting an instant speed boost need to temper their expectations; there are still so many variables affecting performance that it’s just not a guarantee of anything. Until the FttN rollout gets underway, millions of customers, me included, just won’t be getting what they paid for.

 


Post your comment



Reader Comments

RSS feed Email alert

tin:

ADSL2+ is barely worth it for our house.
Looking at the Internode graphs, we'd see a speed increase of between 400kbps and 700kbps (currently getting around 4.5 to 5mbps).

The only reason for us to go ADSL2 would be lower costs, but that only happens with 3rd party DSLAMs... And I doubt that will happen here soon (if ever).

Paul:

ADSL2+ is useless if you are on Pair Gain and no copper line to your house. May as well be ADSL1.

There are 20 000 homes on the NSW Central Coast that can not get ADSL due to distance from exchange or pair gain line, what is Telstra doing to help these residents, not much, chech out NextG they say, yeah right. Lets hope wimax is the answer.

Chuck:

I am guessing you like everyone else gets 90% of their internet content from the US.

So what happens when you get your FTTN network, everyone on 20 Meg+ and the international links saturated. Sure you can download ubuntu from the internode file mirror in 30 secs. Not much else.

What this country needs is 3 or 4 more of the PIPE network international links, this is the bottle neck, this is where bandwidth increases and cost savings need to occur and with better contention rates, the old 400:1 was before people started uploading on their torrents etc, ISPs need to start accounting for a rise in upload traffic.

TonyZ:

Yes and no. A lot of people work from home and need fast connections to/from their office servers. Businesses also need fast connections. This is where fast "local" connections are important. Increasing bandwidth on the international pipe side of things is important too, but don't underestimate the importance of fast national broadband, both downstream and upstream.

Wal:

Which is why a certain conglomerate is laying another fibre connection between Aus and the US off memory, they are plannign the course as we speak, so in theory this would help eleviate the congestion you mention above.
Also the 'of speeds up to 20 MBps' is just clever marketing nothing else an extra few words to cover telstras arse cause they know they have a network that cant deliver what is expected of it. I really hope the Opel group can sort something decent out and fast!