Anti-SOPA internet blackout today said to number 7,000 sites going dark

Peter Dockrill
18 January 2012, 4:11 PM


A reported 7,000 websites including Wikipedia will take part today in a voluntary internet blackout worldwide to raise awareness of the controversial SOPA & PIPA anti-piracy bills.


In protest against the controversial US Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) & Protect IP (PIPA) anti-piracy bills, a reported 7,000 web sites will voluntarily shut down today for 24 hours in perhaps the broadest demonstration ever of internet-powered political action.

The proposed legislation ostensibly defends US intellectual property interests, targeting online piracy as conducted by "rogue" web sites, but critics of the bills argue that, if passed, they would provide media companies with unfettered powers to control the internet while endangering user rights to free speech and the free flow of information on the web. 

 

Notable sites taking part in today's action include Wikipedia, Mozilla, Wordpress, Reddit and Boing Boing. Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales announced in a statement this week: "This is an extraordinary action for our community to take - and while we regret having to prevent the world from having access to Wikipedia for even a second, we simply cannot ignore the fact that SOPA and PIPA endanger free speech both in the United States and abroad, and set a frightening precedent of Internet censorship for the world."

Twitter, Google and Facebook have all publicly opposed the proposed laws but have stopped short of agreeing to shut down their services during the protest. Google has announced it will take part in the demonstration by placing a link on its home page which informs users of its position on the matter.



Critics of the worldwide nature of the blackout argue that an international action is theatrical overkill, especially seeing as the subject of the protest is inherently a domestic US political issue, but Sue Gardner, Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation, begs to differ: "Why is this a global action, rather than US-only? ... The reality is that we don’t think SOPA is going away... Moreover, SOPA and PIPA are just indicators of a much broader problem. All around the world, we’re seeing the development of legislation intended to fight online piracy, and regulate the Internet in other ways, that hurt online freedoms. Our concern extends beyond SOPA and PIPA: they are just part of the problem. We want the Internet to remain free and open, everywhere, for everyone."



Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

CCCMikey (New user):

In a vaguely related note, now that they've found that more than half of the world's recent WiFi routers are vulnerable to being taken over care of the broken WPS feature, it's going to be harder for the various organisations to claim that an IP address is a person. Even if they get SOPA, PIPA, etc passed, there will always be more challenges for them.

18 January 2012, 10:23 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (Senior Forumologist):

IP in this respect is Interlectural Property, NOT Internet Protocol.

The main reason for the protest is that, if the SOPA bill is passed, it will give unmetered power over any site, WORLD WIDE, to the copywrite holder.

So?
eg, MGM can demand that all american based search engine and payment options are to be immdiately blocked to a site that suspect is hosting some copywriten material, and they DONT have to go to court to have the demands met.

This means, if you have a site, that has a link to material that they might not what you to show, you can have your site blocked from google and paypal.

i found this article on the gizmodo site very informative -
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2012/01/what-is-sopa/

Such a bad idea. considering that the ppl that are considering this have no idea how any of this works, how the net works, that the net is an eco-structure that will be completely distroyed if this sort of thing passes.

19 January 2012, 1:28 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (Senior Forumologist):

quote from gizmodo -
"Potential for abuse is rampant. As Public Knowledge points out, Google could easily take it upon itself to delist every viral video site on the internet with a “good faith belief” that they’re hosting copyrighted material. Leaving YouTube as the only major video portal."

scares the hell out of me really...

19 January 2012, 1:30 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

Why would anyone think that this law wouldn't effect people outside of the US? Of course it would have - any site hosted in the USA that fell victim to it would have been shut down worldwide.

22 January 2012, 12:51 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (Senior Forumologist):

but that's not it.

Say your site, hosted in Australia, has something on it that MIGHT be a breach, it doesn't even have to go to court and be proven, someone can request Google to remove you and blacklist you from it's search, and any other company based or owned in the USA that links to your site for anything, advertising, bascially any and all contact to your site MUST be baned.

and they can do this with only reasonably belief. it's scarey.

Mind you, it's been stonewalled for the moment, but it's only going to be a mater of time before some douche in the house of reps decides this would be a good idea for austalia, and they again try to push that national firewall thing again.

23 January 2012, 9:20 PM (3 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user