Apple MacBook Pro October 2011 Update - What's new and should you care?

Conrad Bem
25 October 2011, 2:00 PM


Apple can be relied upon to periodically update its notebook lines, but is this improvement to the MacBook Pro a giant leap or a small step?




Updates to Apple notebooks come like clockwork and today Apple has tweaked the specs of its popular MacBook Pro series. The price tags have remained the same and so has the design and aluminium exteriors, but there have been some important improvements in the specs.

Probably the biggest winner of this update is the entry-level MacBook Pro 15in, which has has its low-end AMD Radeon HD 6490M graphics card replaced with a much more powerful AMD Radeon HD 6750M. Annoyingly, Apple does not reveal the model numbers of its processors, except to give the family of the processor, the number of cores, the clock speed and L3 cache, so based on this information, the processor in the new entry-level MacBook Pro 15in is either the 2nd Gen Intel Core i7-2670QM (2.2GHz) or the 2675QM (also 2.2GHz). The previous processor was the Intel Core i7-2635QM, which is a bit less powerful than either of these two new ones.

As a result of the changes, the low-end MacBook Pro 15in is now equivalent of what used to be the high-end model if you leave aside the difference in hard disk size.

As for the high-end MacBook Pro 15in, the improvements are more subtle. Replacing the AMD Radeon HD 6750M graphics card is an AMD Radeon HD 6770M, providing a slight boost in graphics rendering power. The processor has been upgraded to an Intel Core i7-2760QM (2.4GHz), and we know this for sure because, based on the superficial description of it released by Apple, it's the only one it could be. It supersedes the previous Core i7-2720QM (2.2GHz). This is a fairly minor step up though, so don’t feel bad if you just bought the previous model.

The lower-end MacBook Pro 13in models have had their hard drive storage upgraded to 500GB, which is a nice improvement over the somewhat cramped 320GB HDDs in the previous models. The processor has also improved to what’s most likely either an Intel Core i5-2430M (2.4GHz) or 2435M (also 2.4GHz), which will offer slightly improved performance over the previous Intel Core i5-2415M (2.3GHz).  

The high-end MacBook Pro 13in has had a significant boost in storage, now with a whopping 750GB HDD that’s a big step up over the 500GB HDD. Less dramatic but still important is that the processor’s now a faster Intel Core i7-2640M (2.8GHz) rather than a Core i7-2620M (2.7GHz).

The big-screen MacBook Pro 17in now sports an Intel Core i7-2760QM (2.4GHz), which is faster than the Intel Core i7-2720QM (2.2GHz) that it’s replacing. The dedicated graphics card has also been upgraded, from an AMD Radeon HD 6750M to an AMD Radeon HD 6770M. Neither processor or improvement is earth-shattering, but given that the price tag remains the same you’re getting a faster notebook for no more money.

Of all of these improvements the star of the show is clearly the low-end Apple MacBook Pro 15in because of the significantly upgraded graphics card. It's bad news to anyone who bought the previous model yesterday, but buyers of the other four MacBook Pro models can at least rest easy that the improvements have been a step forward rather than a quantum leap.


Read more stories about

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Mutley (User):

I refuse to buy a Laptop from a company that is so arrogant it cannot even be upfront with me about which processor it has in it.

25 October 2011, 8:36 PM (7 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Cornerstone member):

And so you want us to believe that if Apple stated the model numbers, then you would buy one? Give us a break and simply put your hand up as an Apple-hater.

25 October 2011, 10:04 PM (7 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mutley (User):

The specific Intel CPU in the Laptop is, along with along with other details, critical to the machine's potential performance. This is something I want to know about.

I had no opinion on Apple until I bought an iPhone a couple of years ago. I never expected to end up with a device that Apple deliberately cripples with dreadful software and has to be jailbroken just to get basic productivity functionality. The experience of having to stuff around jailbreaking has made me an Apple hater if you want to put it that way.

With my contract expiring in Feb 2012 it will be goodbye Apple and good riddance.


25 October 2011, 10:37 PM (7 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (Senior Forumologist):

The intel chips that ARE in these systems are commisioned from intel to ONLY be in these systems, and since they run an OS that is SPECIFICALLY optimised to run these processors and hardware, (hence it's REALLY difficult to get MAC OS to install on a normal X86/X64 system) your arguement is almost irrelevent.

THAT said, i wouldn't buy one either. OS/X is horrible.

and reg the iphone thing, you're just saying that cos you HATE itunes.
it runs soooo slow on a windows machine. MAYBE cos they wrote it that way to make ppl buy macs.

GREAT way to sell macs yeah?

25 October 2011, 11:49 PM (7 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mutley (User):

Interesting you saying OS/X is horrible.
With the iPhone it is iOS itself that really annoys me.
The emerging theme here seems to be Apple makes reliable hardware and then cripples it with awful software.

For example, can I see my day's agenda, being appointments and tasks due on my iPhone's lock screen, like I can on my ancient Nokia 6120C? No way! Apple unilaterally decided that personal productivity is not important to anyone (probably why the USA is bankrupt).

I have to unlock, go to Calendar to see appointments, then back out and go to another app (which I had to buy) to see my tasks. What a time-wasting shambles!
To get this simple "day at a glance" functionality I had to jailbreak and install Lockinfo which does the job superbly.

As for iTunes, I think it is OK, except for the fact that it is part of Apple's method of severely restricting what you can do on your iPhone or iPad. It is better at organising music than Windows Media Player. I haven't had any problems with iTunes on my Windows PC.

Went to the shops today. We had a laugh at the fanbois lined up outside the Apple store waiting hours just to buy an iPhone 4S.

26 October 2011, 6:34 PM (6 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (Senior Forumologist):

Tis funny you the one thing you hate is the only thing i like out of apple...

hey, i thing that iOS interface is perfect. Name another device i can give, locked, to my not-yet-2-yr old, and he can open it, find the ap, and use it to play movies?

I Actually just finish setting up my media/file serer to run airplay and airvideo seemlessly to my apple TV. is a wonderful thing.

I can get rid of my old media machine, and replace with a $129 appleTV2

27 October 2011, 4:18 PM (6 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Cornerstone member):

Quoting Mutley:
Went to the shops today. We had a laugh at the fanbois lined up outside the Apple store waiting hours just to buy an iPhone 4S.


Most companies would give almost anything to develop that level of passion and desire in both their company and their products. If you think that MS, Google or any other company does not truly desire the same, then you really are kidding yourself. MS had a go with "The WOW start NOW for Vista" and the "Windows 7 Parties". Is it really any different for MS devotees to have a party to launch W7 than for Apple devotees to want an iPhone 4S?

27 October 2011, 4:48 PM (6 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mutley (User):

Did I say MS or Google etc don't envy Apple's ability to generate passion? No I didn't.

I'm sure MS, Google etc would love to be able to brainwash people with clever marketing hype like Apple do.

The punters lined up at the Apple store simply reminded me of sheep.


27 October 2011, 7:49 PM (6 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user