Apple releases Safari 4 beta: more eye candy

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

Danny Gorog25 February 2009, 9:07 AM

Apple has unexpectedly dropped Safari 4 beta as a free download, and the main selling point is "fast" ... oh, and a lot of "stunning" new eye-candy in true Apple style.


It's been a quiet month from Apple. In fact, if my memory serves me correctly, all we've seen from a hardware perspective has been an upgrade in the graphics processor on the bottom-of-the-line MacBook, and in software, the actual release of iLife and iWork 09.

But this morning, quite unannounced (read, no rumors or leaks) Apple released a beta version of Safari 4, which, as you'd expect from the Apple marketing department is being billed as 'the world’s fastest and most innovative web browser for Mac and Windows PCs'.

So what's in Safari 4, and why do you need it?

First up, Apple has followed in the footsteps of Google and Mozilla in cranking up JavaScript performance with its new "Nitro" engine (for those following the nightly WebKit builds, Nitro used to be called SquirrelFish), which, Apple claims, makes Safari 4.2 times faster than Safari 3, 30 times faster than IE 7 and more than three times faster than Firefox 3. Interestingly, there's no comparison against Google Chrome, which, from my understanding, sets the benchmark for JavaScript processing speed -- but isn't available for Mac OS X yet.

While Apple may not have explicitly mentioned Chrome in its press release, the new UI in Safari 4 says lots about it. The "Tabs on Top" feature, for instance, 'makes tabbed browsing easier and more intuitive'...and 'borrows' one of the best ideas from Google Chrome. (Put simply: Apple has yet again broken its own user interface guidelines and is using the unified application title bar for tabs. Not a bad thing, as the feature is a space-saver, but another example of UI-reinvention that's going to infuriate some people.)



Apple has also integrated other OS X technologies into Safari 4, like Cover Flow so you can visually flip through your bookmarks or history, and 'Top Sites' for a visual preview of your frequently visited pages.



In a nod to Firefox, Apple has beefed up its browser bar too. Now, when you start entering a URL you'll get a full list of history, bookmarks, and your most-visited website based on the text you've entered. There's also a 'Full History Search' which searches through titles, web addresses and the complete text of recently views pages too.

The Full History Search is actually reason enough to upgrade to Safari 4. You access the search via the Bookmarks window, and, after typing in a search term you'll get a full history based on your bookmarks and history. It's a powerful new feature, and one that I can see myself using frequently.


The Windows version of Safari has also been given a complete makeover and now sports a new 'Windows-native look that uses standard Windows font rendering and native title bar, borders and toolbars so Safari fits the look and feel of other Windows XP and Windows Vista applications.' This solves one of the biggest complaints Windows users had with Safari -- that fonts looked "fuzzy" (because they used a port of the Mac font smoother, which is softer than Windows' Cleartype), and that Apple had plonked a Mac GUI look and feel into Windows (something Mac users decried Microsoft for 15 years ago when it did a direct port of Microsoft Office for Windows to Mac, complete with Windows interface.  



If that's not enough for a free download then other features you might like include full Page Zoom, for a closer look at any website without degrading the quality of the site’s layout and text, and a built-in web developer tools to debug, tweak and optimise a website for peak performance and compatibility.

For some the new interface changes may be all too much. If that's you, and you want to revert back to the Safari 3 look and feel, you can still do it and keep Safari 4 performance. Caius Durling has put up a page documenting all the hidden preferences like moving the tab bar back to below the address bar and reinstating the blue progress bar that loads behind the URL.

Safari 4 beta is an important release for Apple, and I expect to see the full version in Snow Leopard, due out later this year. It largely brings Safari back in line with Firefox and Chrome in terms of feature parity (though, of course, lacks Firefox's great add-ins system), and pushes it ahead with better Javascript performance. This fierce competition among browser makers is a great example of how competition keeps products evolving, and where there's really no downside for consumers.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Discosis (User):

Finally, the UI (and the way it broke several Windows UI standards) was one of the major pains about using Safari on Windows, which is (one reason) why it's relegated to "compatibility test" status.

If Apple's willing the let the brushed metal look go under Windows, the look and feel of the next version of iTunes should be quite interesting.

25 February 2009, 10:53 AM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (Advanced Forumologist):

Safari runs very well on the wife's Mac and I prefer using it to either Chrome or Firefox, but under Windows, it was and still is a pig ! (probably something to do with tissue rejection),

Apple has to get rid of that flat 'grey' look though, it's just so 90's.

25 February 2009, 11:30 AM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

I very briefly trialed Safari for Windows a while back with a view to adding it to the browser options we give to students at the school I work for. It didn't meet the needs on a number of fronts, so I never did it.
If I get time, I *might* try this one... But it will need to be damn convincing to bother this time round.

25 February 2009, 2:04 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

Been trying it for a while now. Love it, love the tabs, the snappiness and the 'actual' zoom function (making multi-touch pinch that much more useful.) Funny how the author abbreviates everything in their Bookmarks bar to two letters, I do that too!

I'm not too sure about the most-visited preview feature. Apart from being a bandwidth sucker, it doesn't look all easy to read and it wastes a lot of space, even with the large setting on a Cinema Display. But I love the effect when you click on the site from there. Only Apple!

25 February 2009, 5:29 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

plutonium210 (Advanced member):

Quoting McBanjo:
Love it

Quoting McBanjo:
Only Apple!

............. It just works ........ Especially on a 26" screen ;-)




25 February 2009, 5:51 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting plutonium210:
It just works .....

But all it competitors (well excluding IE) just work too! So what are the advantages?


25 February 2009, 11:07 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Hemma (User):

Quoting plutonium210:
Especially on a 26" screen ;-)


Really? It's not bad on my 30 inch screen.

26 February 2009, 12:42 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

plutonium210 (Advanced member):

Quoting Hemma:
Really? It's not bad on my 30 inch screen.

LOL ! No one likes a show-off Hemma ;-)

03 March 2009, 11:40 AM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

rjsquires (User):

Hmm...Safari 4 Beta looks like Internet Explorer, Firefox and Chrome crossed with iTunes (on steroids.) This is the result you'd get if you put all the programs in a blender. Oh wait...Apple did!!!

I'm Not keen on Coverflow - It should clearly stay in iTunes. But applying the native Windows look and feel (interface) is a good move. Now all Apple need to do is extend this to iTunes and QuickTime.

26 February 2009, 11:58 AM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

TV Bis (User):

A good article Danny although it’s a bit of a shame that you don’t get many responses that stay on the subject and are worth reading.
I think it is great how all the browsers are trying to out do each other now. A bit of healthy competition helps stimulate the otherwise boring market of browsing.
After trying all of the latest I still keep going back to IE. Why? Because it is not trying to be fancy! Little modifications come along now and then which enhances and improve areas that need improvements. It’s not falling over itself trying to be the greatest, quickest browser known to human kind.
Just like all wise things do – it waits, observes, plans and then attacks…………….


02 March 2009, 12:39 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting TV Bis:
a bit of a shame that you don’t get many responses that stay on the subject

Vandals are everywhere unfortunately which is not something Danny's article deserved. But back to the topic at hand.

Quoting TV Bis:
After trying all of the latest I still keep going back to IE. Why?

I agree totally with your reasoning, but my observations have been quite different. For a long time I was quite content with IE and for the most part it did work. That changed dramatically from V6 onwards. I found it was easier to just install Fire-fox than to battle the constraints IE applied. Particularly when updates would often revert configuration settings.
If IE just worked and did not intervene I doubt I'd bother loading anything else. I do want a browser that is quick is convenient and most importantly one that is for the most part invisible with content being browsed the highlight of my attention.


02 March 2009, 1:04 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Halcon (Advanced member):

I am very happy using Mozilla Firefox, I am not convinced to switch to another browser.
This is just for the dirty rotten apple fanboys.

02 March 2009, 2:44 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Hemma (User):

Quoting Halcon:
I am very happy using Mozilla Firefox, I am not convinced to switch to another browser.

Same here. I've found that Firefox just seem to be what's more comfortable for me.... whether its Ubuntu, OSX, XP or Vista.... maybe its got something to do with the way that it's similar on all these platforms.... and the simplicity without being too minimal...

Quoting Halcon:
This is just for the dirty rotten apple fanboys.

I've given up bickering with them. Whatever floats your boat I guess...

02 March 2009, 3:32 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting Halcon:
This is just for the dirty rotten apple fanboys.

I don't think too many serious developers would write softare products solely for fan-boys of any persuasion. The release of Safari 4 for popular Windows platforms (as well as for MAC) says the authors are hoping for a wider take-up.


02 March 2009, 5:05 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Hemma (User):

Quoting Raindog:
a wider take-up.

At one point I thought it had to do with allowing PC users to get a glimpse of OSX.

02 March 2009, 9:10 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting Hemma:
At one point I thought it had to do with allowing PC users to get a glimpse of OSX.

It has a lot to do with that. Somehow I doubt Safari is the motivation for very much change in hearts and minds or even in simple preference.


02 March 2009, 11:45 PM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags