Apple prepping a quad-core MacBook Pro?

David Flynn
30 December 2008, 7:37 PM


Just one week ahead of Macworld, Intel quietly slips a low-cost quad-core processor into its mobile line-up. Is this the powerplant for Apple’s new unibody 17 inch MacBook Pro?


Apple’s mid-October refresh of its notebook line left a curious gap at the top end of the card, with the 17 inch MacBook Pro missing the make-over of its 15 inch cousin and the 13.3 inch MacBook.

That could be about to change next week, with the possibility that the Jobs-free keynote at Apple’s last Macworld show could be used to launch the company’s most powerful laptop ever.

There’s no doubt that the 17 inch MacBook Pro will soon boast the same sleek ‘unibody’ chassis as its siblings. In a company with Apple’s design and marketing ethic, it couldn’t be any other way.


So why the delay? There’s a fair chance that Apple sets its pace against Intel’s roadmap and the arrival of a low-cost quad-core mobile processor. That CPU broke ground overnight, in the ‘dead zone’ lull between Christmas and New Year, sneaking onto one of the regular updates of Intel’s CPU price list.

Branded as the Core 2 Extreme Q9000, the chip partners four 2GHz cores with 6MB of Level 2 cache for US$348. That price is one third the US$1,038 ticket for the QX9300 2.53GHz superslab and well under half that of the next-down Q9100 2.26GHz, which lists at US$851.

Both of those processors have twice the L2 cache of the Q9000, but they all share the same 45nm Penryn-class architecture and a 1GHz front side bus, compared to the 800MHz bus (also with 6MB of cache) of the T8300 and T8500 processors used in the 15 inch MacBook Pro.

With this budget-priced four-core engine Apple could still deliver its most muscle-bound laptop and avoid the risk of sticker shock of breaking the US$3,000 barrier in an increasingly dollar-sensitive market, given that the 17 inch MacBook already sells at US$2,799.

However, while Intel chose not to trumpet its newest CPU, Acer was quick off the mark to announce the Q9000 would drive a new “extreme gaming” notebook with an 18.4-inch screen and Nvidia GeForce 9700M GT graphics. The system will start at US$1,799, but there’s been no word on intended local availability.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Truckasauras (New user):

God, Apple is still so expensive. US$3,000 for even a high powered laptop is way too much.

31 December 2008, 11:39 AM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

bartonlp (New user):

I bought a Dell Inspiron 530 this year with a Q9300, 2Gig Ram, 320G Hard Drive, and an ATI graphics card, with Ubuntu 8.04 (which I upgraded to 8.10 a few months later without incident) for $650. The Dell is a Desktop not a laptop but still the price difference is astounding. An Apple desktop is about three times what I payed.

I like Apple, especially now that it has a Unix variant, but the price of their hardware is just too much.

01 January 2009, 4:24 AM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

metawork (New user):

so what? 2 years ago people bitched about apple taking too long to revamp their systems because moto/freescale would pump up their proc's clock speed about 166mhz a year. unless marketing has a really good reason to hold back on shipping faster and more powerful processors, stuff the chip in the tower, the tower in cardboard, and ship the suckers. the more incentives apple gives consumers the more macs they'll sell.

i bet you think apple shouldn't release an ipod with a 100gb hd because the guy who just bought one with an 80gb will be sad...

10 August 2009, 4:13 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

wwilliam.klein (New user):

This is what i was looking for, but price is too high. Any suggestion, when it will go down seo?

11 August 2009, 4:02 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

metawork (New user):

So why the delay? There’s a fair chance that Apple sets its pace against Intel’s roadmap and the arrival of a low-cost quad-core mobile processor. That CPU broke ground overnight, in the ‘dead zone’ lull between Christmas and New Year, sneaking onto one of the regular updates of Intel’s CPU price list.domain name registration

29 August 2009, 4:09 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user