As Telstra sits on Next G, Optus starts 4G trials

David Braue
20 November 2009, 9:45 AM


Optus will trial Long Term Evolution (LTE) mobile technology from next year. Let's hope it's better than their current 3G network.


Optus parent SingTel has taken a proactive jab at Telstra and other rivals with the announcement that the group will test Long Term Evolution (LTE) mobile technology in Australia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Singapore during a six to nine-month trial set to begin next year.

Often referred to as '4G', LTE is the next generation of UMTS, the current 3G wireless technology, and promises LAN-like speeds of more than 100Mbps and less than 10ms latency. The improvements come thanks to a variety of enhancements including an all-IP networking architecture and the use of lower frequency bands enabling higher-speed transmission.

This has made it the favoured technology for use in the 700MH radiofrequency spectrum band, which is currently occupied by analogue TV broadcasting signals but will be freed up after analogue TV is shut down – which, in Australia, will happen in stages through the end of 2013.

Although carriers around the world have recently been jumping on the LTE bandwagon, the announcement of formal LTE trials is particularly pointed in Australia because LTE is currently a key negotiating tool in Senator Stephen Conroy's efforts to push Telstra towards voluntary separation. In announcing the planned separation in September, Conroy said Telstra would be prohibited from accessing the spectrum necessary to run LTE unless it met a number of conditions, including voluntary separation and divestment of its interest in Foxtel and the HFC network that carries it.

Unsurprisingly, the plan raised hackles at Telstra, which sees LTE as an important next step despite its massive investment in its current Next-G network, which Telstra claims will support maximum speeds of up to 42Mbps in the near future.

"Spectrum has finite capacity," CEO David Thodey warned when asked about the magnitude of Conroy's threat during Telstra's recent investor day. "It is important to look forward to the future, and spectrum is a requirement….If we are prevented from getting access to LTE spectrum, in effect that will take one provider out of the market in rural Australia. This is not about creating competition; this is doing exactly the opposite."

CFO John Stanhope even went so far as to make the jaw-dropping pronouncement that separation could be a "win-win for shareholders" if Telstra gets access to "advanced wireless spectrum" and, among other requirements, keeps its HFC and Foxtel interests.

While Telstra waits nervously for the legislative situation to emerge, the announcement that SingTel will begin its LTE trials adds additional pressure to the carrier, which like most telcos has made wireless a key part of its shift away from its traditional fixed-line business.

Development of clear LTE plans will be critical in coming years as an expected explosion in 4G networks comes to fruition. IDC this week predicted rapid growth of LTE as the popularity of 3G forced telcos to find new ways to meet rapidly-growing demand for mobile data.

"Most, if not all, [Asia-Pacific] markets will need to move to an all-IP 4G infrastructure," Asia-Pacific telecommunications research director Bill Rojas said. "The current propaganda of LTE infrastructure is being concentrated on developed APEJ markets…but this attention is not addressing another huge opportunity… the pent-up demand of under-served broadband households."

SingTel's statement suggests the carrier group is poised to move quickly to establish a consistent LTE-based technology foundation on which it can deliver advanced wireless data services. With 273 million SingTel customers across eight countries (the four hosting the trials as well as Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Thailand), the trials – which will involve Alcatal-Lucent, Ericsson, Huwaei, NEC, Nokia Siemens Networks, and ZTE – would pose a significant threat to the established regional mobile order.

"LTE will open doors to new and more powerful mobile solutions that will transform the way our customers across the region live, work and play," SingTel International Group CEO Lim Chuan Poh said in a statement.

"The regional trials underscore SingTel's commitment to offering our retail and enterprise customers more innovative services that are at the cutting edge of technology…. We are in an excellent position to drive the adoption of LTE technology in the region and beyond."


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (User):

Sucked in Telstra. That's what you get for assuming everyone will bow down and pay taxes to you.

20 November 2009, 11:27 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

apt.pupil (New user):

Quoting Tin:
Sucked in Telstra. That's what you get for assuming everyone will bow down and pay taxes to you.

that comment makes me laugh.

The Telstra that we know of today is the results of the mistake of letting Johnny Howard sit 3 terms



20 November 2009, 5:08 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting apt.pupil:
The Telstra that we know of today is the results of the mistake of letting Johnny Howard sit 3 terms


Yeah... Cause Johnny H sold Telstra all on his own without anyone else noticing, and then ran it into the ground as CEO... Oh wait, no he didn't.

Telstra now is in reality a result of 2 CEOs completly not understanding customers or how to run a business. Trying to shut down and close of access to your largest customers is retarded. Yet here is Telstra making it cheaper for companies like Optus and Internode to roll out their own new networks than to access an existing one.
Telstra could easily maintain a legal monopoly, but Ziggy and Sol were too focused on retail to notice.

20 November 2009, 6:34 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting apt.pupil:
The Telstra that we know of today is the results of the mistake of letting Johnny Howard sit 3 terms

Well that's the official line from Conroy-esque propaganda, of course it conveniently forgets the equally stupid moves by the team before JH who set the whole stupidity on its roll. And of course there are the various board member of Big T who paid way too much to a succession of corporate vandals who ran the organisation at a rapid rate towards ruin. And lets not forget that the origins from which big T evolved were that of an expensive government funded free range sheltered workshop, with a mantra of "we'll connect your phone whe, and only when we are good and ready" (unless the boys want some OT).

And before you condemn Howard (or more correctly the Howard let Coalition Government) consider the results on the board for the current Federal Twerp for Communications. Thus far we have,

- An untested threat aimed towards the largest national player
- A massive and poorly estimated promise of a mostly unspecified national network with no clear estimates of time or cost.
- A viable rural and regional network which would be running now canned despite signed contracts full costings and firm delivery date.
- Introduction despite failed testing of an unwanted and ineffective content filter with aims that make the kremlin proud. Pity its only achievement is to waste huge gobs of scarce and expensive bandwidth. (TY Tin)

3G, 4G, fibre, copper the results for the Australian communicatios landscape look like remaining a wholly uncoordinated and unfairly distributed mess for some time to come.

20 November 2009, 9:05 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting Raindog:
of course it conveniently forget the equally stupid moves by the team before JH


Don't forget the common line about John Howard neglecting broadband for 12 years... That good old line forgets that for about the first 6 years, the internet wasn't even a common household thing. And it wasn't until the last term that broadband went beyond gamers and nerds.


Quoting Raindog:
Thus far we have



Add on the "child porn" filter that is immensely unpopular, ill-conceived and extremely expensive. Makes Johnny H's efforts on communications look like the best option.

20 November 2009, 9:40 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AlexF (New user):

Useless governments want it both ways - they want the cash from sale of Telstra, btu they also want Telstra to do they bidding.
Telstra made it clear - it don't want to be in wacky NBN money-drain, so, as a corporation it has a right to do what's best for its new (no matter how greedy) owners.
If government wants Telstra to do their bidding then buy 50.1% of Telstra back!
Rudd, you dreamt it up, now caugh it up.

22 November 2009, 3:07 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ausman (New user):

I don't want Telstra to own public infrastructure but also don't want mandatory filtering or to have the country run into financial ruin. Who's left to vote for now?!

26 November 2009, 4:05 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

The Big Baboo (New user):

Quoting Ausman:
Who's left to vote for now?!

Well :) We could always do what "Raindog" suggested once and that's form our own party,elect him President and then buy Telstra back from them and he could run it as he sees fit. How about it "Raindog" are you up for it :)





26 November 2009, 4:35 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

john-is-smart (New user):

I think that this is fantastic news for Optus customers and will bring in a lot more customers from other networks.

I am already using Optus' 3G network in the country outside of Melbourne and am picking up fantastic reception, I guess this will just make it better

29 December 2009, 12:08 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user