Asus and NVIDIA unveil ECS 1000 desktop supercomputer

Shane McGlaun
30 October 2009, 3:00 PM


Asus claims its supercomputer has 1.1 Teraflops of processing power.


Most of us are probably more familiar with Asus as the company that started the netbook revolution with its line of Eee netbooks. The little machines are now offered in more flavors than most of us care to consider. In fact, Asus recently had specs on a couple new Eee netbooks leak called the 1201N and the 1201HA.

Asus isn't only about netbooks though and this week the company unveiled a desktop supercomputer called the ECS 1000. The machine uses a trio of NVIDIA Tesla c1060 computing processors along with a single Quadro FX5800 for graphics. The computer is aimed at scientific research, image manipulation, and engineering uses.



The main CPU for the computer is the 3.33GHz Intel LGA1366 Xeon W3580. The three Tesla c1060 cards have a total of 960 graphics processing cores inside. These Tesla GPGPUs are marketed by NVIDIA as alternatives to traditional CPUs that need more power and are not as fast. Overall, the machine measures 445mm x 217.5mm x 545mm. Storage for the machine is to a 500GB SATA HDD and the power supply is good for 1100 watts. The machines are ready to ship according to Asus, but the company won’t offer pricing.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

petert (Advanced Forumologist):

If you need to ask the price, then you cannot afford it :-)

30 October 2009, 3:13 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony23 (New user):

The other thing this would be very exciting for is to use to brute force attack passwords. Time to increase password length and complexity in corporate guidance perhaps?

30 October 2009, 6:15 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

EggLet (New user):

You do realise the Xbox 360 has 1 Teraflop and the Playstation 3 has 2 Teraflops of computing power? This isn't very ground breaking especially if this is one of the latest, greatest and most expensive commercial computers you can buy considering both consoles have been around for several years now. Even the latest ATI graphics card is meant to be 2 Teraflops I think from memory.

31 October 2009, 9:34 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony23 (New user):

Quoting EggLet:
You do realise the Xbox 360 has 1 Teraflop and the Playstation 3 has 2 Teraflops of computing power?

No, I didn't realise that. I guess its a wake up call (for me anyway) how far our computing systems have gone. Don't spose you can drop a link where it says what computers systems do what in terraflops or mention a bench mark software to use. I'm curious to see what my system can do and see what that means in a historical context.

Once thing that strikes me as odd though is that I'm now left wondering "what's the point of this system?" I mean, if the advertised system isn't capabile of earth-shattering speeds, what's the point? Is it the scalability of the thing?




01 November 2009, 12:00 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

EggLet (New user):

The current fastest super computer runs on the same chip technology as the one used in PS3 and it reaches just over 1 Petaflop (peta = 1000 * Tera) but I found this chart http://www.top500.org/lists/2009/06/performance_development interesting as at a guess, because of the logarithmic scale, only about 6-8 years before the PS3 was made the fastest computer was able to reach the same level of flops.

Yeah I'm kinda wondering why they are bragging about the system consider the PS3 is being used as a part of an existing research network called folding@home as well as GPUs and home computers.

I don't know of any software which would be able to test your system as I haven't looked into it and I'm guessing that possibly each test is made by engineers to get the most out of each system so it might be impossible for benchmark software to exist although I'm not sure if that's correct as it is just a guess. Just for your own knowledge a FLOP, the unit of measurement they are using, stands for floating point operations per second which is basically 2562.32434 + 523.3211 over and over again at a guess so if you did some simple programming that could give you a rough idea however it would only be using the CPU not the GPU plus other programs etc will slow the result down so it wouldn't be that accurate, it probably would have to be some propratory machine code which would be able to calculate it but then you would have to be really smart and knowledgable in that sort of thing which I'm not beyond the basics.

Hope that helps.

02 November 2009, 1:37 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user