ASUS UX31E & UX21E: Finally, the Ultrabooks that should have been first to market

Tony Sarno
28 November 2011, 6:13 PM


ASUS has finally launched the sexy Ultrabooks everyone's been waiting for - the ideal machines to kick start the Ultrabook campaign after Acer's first lukewarm efforts.



The UX31E and UX21E on the shag pile at the launch

When Intel's Ultrabook concept first surfaced, it wasn't long before ASUS showed off a prototype Ultrabook that stunned everyone with its machined aluminium looks and razor-thin slimness. But it was Acer that went to market in Australia first with the Acer Aspire S3 Ultrabook. And once we got our hands on one it wasn't so much sexy as practical – thin, sure, but with a conservative design and built out of a magnesium alloy that managed to look and feel like plastic. Worse, the model we tested - with a 320GB mechanical drive - at times took longer to boot up applications than the low-power ultraportables it was meant to supersede. All this for a hefty $1,399 (for the version with the Intel Core i5 processor and 320Gb mechanical drive) .

It wasn't an amazing start for Ultrabooks, and it was soon followed by stories of Ultrabook makers cutting production numbers after initial sales were not meeting expectations. At the same time, we spotted a retailer already discounting the Aspire S3, just weeks after it hit the market.

Thankfully, the main act took the stage this week. ASUS launched the 11.6in UX21E and 13.3in UX31E Ultrabooks, finally giving consumers Ultrabooks they can get excited about, even if it calls them Zenbooks. The Ultrabook trademark and specifications were created by Intel to put sexy back into the laptop category after tablets (ie, the iPad) started eating into notebook sales. And there was also a stunningly successful example of the concept: Apple's MacBook Air, which has been selling in the millions in part thanks to not having any competition from Wintel machines.

The UX31E and UX21E are exactly what Intel ordered and the four models released yesterday (an Intel Core i5 and Core i7 version of each) can justifiably be considered direct competitors to the MacBook Air. Even if the pricing is still relatively high, it's easier to see these machines justifying it than the Aspire S3. When passed around to people at the launch, the ASUS Ultrabooks generated the same kind of "wow" response that the MacBook Airs used to get when they first arrived. They are unnervingly thin (both an insane 3mm at the front edge and around 17mm at the back) but surprisingly solid thanks to their machined aluminium unibody which is finished in striking concentric circles.

The whole point of Ultrabooks, however, is that they have to be more than just razor-thin supermodels. On this alone the Samsung Series 9 notebooks and some Sony Vaios would give them a run for their money. Ultrabooks have to meet a set of Intel specs that ensure they are superior to the ordinary notebooks that Intel wants to eventually see gone, in just about every aspect. The ASUS modes are a great example of the Intel Ultrabook requirements in action, which include:

Slim design - less than 21 mm thick


The UX31E - 3mm at the tip, 17mm at the back

UX21E - as above, but 16.76mm at the back

 

The ASUS UX31 is 17mm at its thickest and the UX21E is 16.76mm, so they come in well under. Their slimness is the very first thing you notice, prompting you to wonder how any components can fit inside, let alone powerful processors like Core i5s or Core i7s and drives of any kind. Most ordinary notebooks tend to be between 25mm to 35mm thick, a contrast that highlights how much easier it is to slip an Ultrabook into a case or bag of documents instead of having to carry it separately in its own computer bag. The big challenge when you're shoehorning a computer into a razor is not just making the components fit, but heat management as well. Here ASUS has designed custom cooling technology which apparently uses a V-shaped channel with a copper fin design for improved airflow and cooling. We say apparently because we couldn't peek inside one of their Ultrabooks yesterday.

Less than 1.4kgs in weight

The UX31E, head on

The UX31E is 1.3kgs, the UX21E 1.10kg. Like the slimness, weight is one of the triumphs of these machines. They weigh as much as netbooks (and double most tablets), but with the performance of real computers. This gives Intel the opportunity to promote one of the Ultrabooks' advantages over tablets – they let you do serious work, instead of just web surfing and lazy media consumption.

When you consider the crazy slimness and ethereal weight of the things, the hardware ASUS has been able to fit within the dimensions is astonishing. The 13.3 display on the UX31E delivers a resolution of 1,600 x 900, which is superior to the MacBook Air's 1,440 x 900. The 11.6in gives you 1,366 x 768, which means it fits the same amount of pixels in its tiny screen as a big lumbering laptop on its 15.6in display.

Both have attractive, well-spaced chiclet style keyboards and a sound system that uses ASUS's SonicMaster and Bang Olufsen's ICEpower audio technologies. We weren't able to get a good read on the sound amid the noise of the launch, but ASUS assures us the Bang Olufsen connection optimises the entire system so it can produces above-average sound, using power management, amplification, acoustics and even optimised digital signal processing. Some reviewers who've had a good listen agree the sound is excellent, saying the quality is also helped by the rigidity of the US31E and UX21E's chassis.

Ports are usually the first things to be sacrificed when notebook makers attempt to create slim machines and were the first things to be left out when the iPad was designed. The UX31E has two USB ports (one with the USB 3.0 superfast standard), a mini-HDMI port, an SD card reader, a mini-VGA port and an audio/microphone jack. The UX21E loses the SD card reader. Both have a camera.

Ultra-fast start up

This UX21E resumed from sleep in less than 2 seconds and took 18 seconds to cold boot

One of the frequently quoted advantages that tablets have over notebooks is lightning-fast resume from sleep mode. Ultrabooks are expected to be nearly as fast, so Intel has mandated a technology called Intel Rapid Start for every Ultrabook. This is essentially a system that hibernates the machine to NAND, a type of volatile flash memory on the laptop motherboard that doesn't require power to retain data. Basically it means that even if the system is not drawing any power it will remember what was in memory when you resume. The result is an ultra-quick resume of around two seconds, which we've seen on both the ASUS and Acer Ultrabooks.

While Intel did not set a requirement for startup from a cold boot, the SSDs help here. They enable the Ultrabooks (or any other laptop with an SSD drive) to start more rapidly than machines with mechanical drives. For the UX21E, we counted a cold boot start of 18 seconds. That's massively faster than the minute or more that it takes a Windows PC to get going.

CULV (Consumer Ultra-Low-Voltage) processors

Intel's CULV processors are not the same kind of anaemic low-voltage processors that blighted previous ultraportables, on which opening a big PDF was a 5-minute struggle. Based on our testing of the Acer Aspire S3, the processors are, in fact, nearly as powerful and in some cases exceed the performance of first generation Intel Core full-power processors found in standard notebooks. While using the Acer Aspire S3 heavily for a week, we didn't notice any lethargy that could be attributed to its low voltage Core i5 CPU (which is the same as the Core i5 in the ASUS UX21E). The Core i5 and Core i7 processors available for the ASUS Ultrabooks will handle daily computing tasks and much more with ease. An 11.6in 1.1kg notebook with a Core i7 in it has a power-to-weight ratio that's unheard of at prices less than the Greek national debt. Incidentally, the UX21E also comes with a Core i3 option. The processors in the UX31E and UX21E are mated with 4GB of RAM. This CPU and RAM "engine room" is helped along by the solid state drives in both laptops. There are no nasty SSD/Mechanical drive combos here, just superfast SSDs.

Extended battery life

Intel demands at least 5 hours of battery life for the thinnest/smallest Ultrabooks and ideally 8 hours for the bigger ones. We weren't able to test the ASUS Ultrabooks at the launch but ASUS claims a battery life of around 5 hours for the UX21E and 7 hours for the UX31E. It strikes us as reasonable. With the Acer Aspire S3 we got about 4.5 hours (doing word processing and web surfing, and using an USB mobile broadband dongle), which was pretty good considering the S3 also housed a big 320GB mechanical drive. Compared to the 2-3 hour battery life of most laptops, the Ultrabooks are way ahead. ASUS also reckons an in-house technology it calls "Super Hybrid Engine II" helps it extract more battery life than its competitors and gives the UX31E and UX21E two weeks of stand-by time. Until we test an ASUS Ultrabook, we'll have to take their word for it.

Flash-based SSDs

On the machines meant for the Australian market, storage on the UX31E comes in 128GB and 256GB SSD options, while on the UX21E it's 128GB only. SSDs are one of the reasons the Ultrabooks deliver good performance, but SSDs are also less likely to fail than mechanical drives, can be made thinner and don't draw as much battery power. In fact, Ultrabooks would not be possible without SSD drives. Even the Acer S3 with the mechanical drive has a 20GB SSD onto which it loads programs to speed things up.

Intel HD 3000 onboard graphics

This is to prevent Ultrabook makers from adding third party discrete graphics cards that would be a massive drain on battery life and make cooling more difficult. Graphics cards are one of the big rorts in laptops, often included as a marketing ploy to reassure consumers that the notebooks will handle graphics well. In fact, the HD 3000 graphics embedded in all Intel second gen CPUs will meet the graphics requirements of 95% of all notebook users. You only really need a discrete card in a notebook if you have to play games at full details, which Intel's onboard graphics won't be able to do, generally managing between low and medium settings for most games. So at this stage, Ultrabooks are not ideal for playing intensive PC games at maximum resolution, but how many people want to do this anyway?

OPTIONAL: Anti-theft technology

This is an interesting one. Intel requires the Ultrabook makers to include anti-theft hardware in the Ultrabooks. Used in combination with anti-theft software provided by companies such as McAfee, this hardware communicates with an Intel security server and is able to shut down and remotely lock the notebook if this is stolen. The anti-theft system can take action if it suspects the notebook is stolen (too many password attempts) or if you report the machine as stolen. It then disables the Ultrabook and data access even if the Ultrabook's hard drive is removed, replaced or reformatted. But while anti-theft technology is part of the Ultrabook spec, it's a premium service that's purchased through the notebook retailer, not Intel or ASUS. Dick Smith is the first Australian retailer to offer the "Anti-theft" service for $49.95 for two year, if you buy a UX31E or UX21E from there. However, it will offer a complementary free subscription until the end of the year.

No optical drive


Why would you ruin these amazing aesthetics with a CD/DVD drive?

In this day and age of fast Wi-Fi and USB 3.0, optical drives are just nasty and Intel has mandated them out of the Ultrabook spec. They can prevent Ultrabooks from being made thin enough, will soak up battery charge if in use and the great Steve Jobs himself banned them from Apple's MacBook Airs and latest MacBook 13in notebooks.

Sub US$1,000 price

At current exchange rates, the Ultrabooks released in Australia don't meet this loose requirement. In fact, hardly any Ultrabooks do, with most coming in over the US$1,000 mark. Pricing is one thing Intel can't enforce and the vendors have taken advantage of it. The ASUS UX31E powered by the Core i5 and with 128GB hard drive costs AU$1,499 (exchange converted to US$1,550) and the UX21E AU$1,399 (US$1,450). In the US, however, these same Ultrabooks come closer to meeting the Intel pricing requirement. The comparable ASUS UX31E (with the core i5 and 128GB SSD) is $1,099 in the US and the UX21E (Core i5, 128GB SSD) actually sneaks in under US$999. In Australia the pricing seems directed more at getting close to the MacBook Air's price. For instance, the equivalent MacBook Air to the aforementioned UX21E (with the 11in screen and 128GB SSD) is $1,349. The 13in MacBook Air that matches the UX31E (Core i5, 128GB SSD) is $1,449.

We believe there is no question that Ultrabooks will succeed, with the rate of their take up determined mostly by pricing. In just about every aspect Ultrabooks are superior to standard notebooks. Who wouldn't want a stunning, razor-thin ultralight machine with long battery life and as much performance as that big clunker on their desk? But these early Ultrabooks are still charging a premium for their extreme portability, and while their bigger notebook opposition is heavier and uglier it can still give you machines with Core i7s, 8GBs of RAM and 1 terabyte hard drives for around $800. Once Ultrabooks start to fall below AU $1,000 then it's game over for ordinary notebooks.

 


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

odysseus (New user):

What's the quality of the screen like - colours, viewing angles? Is it IPS or TN or VA?

I had a look at an Acer S3 at Dick Smith and the viewing angles seemed poor, and the screen was too glossy for me. It'd be good to hear a comparison.

09 November 2011, 8:05 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

I've been waiting for these... But WTF did they do with the price? Unless they bring it down below the Macbook Air, my money stays with me until I can bring myself to buy an Apple product.

09 November 2011, 9:06 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

larry wildblood (New user):

I should have bought one of these instead of the iPad 2 which costs as much as a netbook yet its productivity is limited. Theses are portable and straight forward to use instead of the iPads Apple work arounds and oblique operating sysetwm.

09 November 2011, 11:02 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

John in Brisbane (User):

Nice article thanks.

I'm a complete fan of the formula but have two caveats right now:

1. You can have a mac book for $1100 right now. Mature, second gen design, big user base. Lower specs but no suprises.

2. I am a little sus on Asus right now. I've just had 3 dud touch pads on eee 1215Bs - ie - I bought one, it was faulty and the next 2 replacements were also duds. This is despite the issue being known about 4 months ago in the US ... not good. I gave up, deciding to wait for ultrabooks. Having said that, I'm typing this on a battery eee 1000he that should have died ages ago lol.

In short, I'm waiting, despite being ready for an upgrade now.

10 November 2011, 12:54 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

PCMan101 (New user):

@Tony Sarno: Your title for this article has a typo in it. Asus is misspelled. o_O

10 November 2011, 6:00 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony Sarno (APC staff):

Ooops, fixed. Too many UXs in there. Hopefully people saw it as a play on words ;-)

10 November 2011, 7:32 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

J876 (User):

These laptops strike a good balance between power and portability. However, there are still a few issues with them that will put some users off.

1. Graphics - Graphics cards aren't just used for games. A lot of engineering and design software needs a proper nVidia or AMD graphics card to run properly. One of my family members has just bought a Dell XPS 15 and it has an i7-720QM processor and nVidia 540M graphics. Her design sofware would not open with the Intel graphics because it is not full spec.

2. Replacement/upgrades - To make these things that thin something has got to give can you upgrade/repace the RAM easily or is it soldered in? How much will it cost to repair when the warranty expires? How long will the flash in SSD last before it wears out?

They look good for basic word processing and most business tasks but they still have a long way to go to replace a full spec laptop.



10 November 2011, 11:10 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

That said...
1. an engineer's NOT going to buy one of these, at least not for design purposes.

2. since they are supposed to about $1000, it's not going to be worth the effort to try and get it repaired once it's outside of warranty. At the current rate of development, in 12-18 months time, you'd be able to get something faster, lighter, that runs cooler for the same if not less money.

remember, Apple airbooks aside, these are pretty much Gen1 devices. they are only going to get better. and seriously? this looks like the goods.

Was actually looking @ a U36JC @ harvey's for a family member. they had it for sub$1200. it's a nice thing. i'd almost go so far as to say as nice as my wife's sony S series.

In all honesty, the only thing asus usually fails in is the touch pad. but i hate touch pads anyway... mouse for the win.

11 November 2011, 10:34 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mutley (User):

Its a joke that Australians are being overcharged by US$451 for the UX31E. I'll probably buy an ultrabook direct the USA.

13 November 2011, 5:21 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

BrownieBoy (User):

There's rorting the Aussie public, there there's just taking the piss!

A high-end Macbook Air is 1600 USD in the States and 1800 AUD here. That's a premium of just over a 10%, which is bad enough. But a 30% Aussie Tax? For absolutely no reason other than they think that they can get away with it? I think not.

If you must have Windows, you can pick up a OEM copy of Windows 7 Home Premium for about $100 if you shop around. You can easily put that on a Macbook Air as a dual-boot with Bootcamp, or in an virtual machine with VirtualBox, Parallels or whatever. At least you'd have another OS to fall back on when Windows screws up, as it inevitably will.



14 November 2011, 2:31 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting BrownieBoy:
A high-end Macbook Air is 1600 USD in the States and 1800 AUD here. That's a premium of just over a 10%


GST - US prices tend not to include any sales taxes, where ours do.


Quoting BrownieBoy:
But a 30% Aussie Tax? For absolutely no reason other than they think that they can get away with it? I think not.


I feel the same - was waiting for these, and now will probably look at Apple, as much as I can't stand them. I'll need a sticker to cover the Apple logo, but that's far cheaper than the price of the Asus one.


Quoting BrownieBoy:
You can easily put that on a Macbook Air as a dual-boot with Bootcamp
Quoting BrownieBoy:
At least you'd have another OS to fall back on when Windows screws up, as it inevitably will.


Or hose MacOSX and install Windows on it's own. Or install Linux and Windows as a dual boot. Only trouble with dual booting is that on an SSD, free space is harder to come by.

14 November 2011, 8:42 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mutley (User):

The Macbook Air is even more expensive than the other Ultrabooks!
No way I'll buy an Apple product that has less ports than the ASUS UX series. I also can't stand Apple's control freakery.

I suggest you have look at the Toshiba Z830. It looks OK & has a backlit keyboard too. The HP ultrabook - the Folio 13 also looks good. I expect Toshiba & HP will also have other ultrabooks to follow.

16 November 2011, 11:26 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

PaulTester (New user):

Although it is not as fast, I am still getting lot's of use out of my Toshiba Portege R600-108 with 128Gb SSD, 3 Meg RAM, built in 3G and camera and transflective screen that allows use in strong sunlight......all at a weight of 0.775Kg!

17 November 2011, 9:25 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

srgandhi87 (New user):

Hi all,

Would the UX31E be suitable for GIS/CAD/Remote sensing users? This looks like a sweet portable powerhouse laptop but I'm just worried the screen size being only 13.3" and the graphics won't hold up to programs such as ArcGIS, ENVI etc.

Would appreciate anyone's thoughts on this!

Cheers

26 December 2011, 8:21 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mutley (User):

For CAD work you normally need a decent dedicated graphics card, which these Utrabooks don't have.

However, I expect that once the Intel Ivy Bridge chips become available in a few months (perhaps even before), manufacturers will be squeezing graphics cards into Notebooks that are only slightly thicker than the UX31E, Toshiba Z830 etc.

28 December 2011, 11:18 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

John in Brisbane (User):

Nah don't bother. If you need a portable CAD rig, I've seen quite a few cheap workstation laptops on ebay recently - 17", older but still decent Core2duos and actual workstation graphics cards - nvidia quadros etc. A few were only $400! Ok, not as easy to lug on the bus/train/bike but for less than half the money you're getting workstation graphics on the go. Maybe worth a look? I found out that you can get hacked drivers for the graphics cards to use them for gaming so I've been considering one.

29 December 2011, 1:02 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

John in Brisbane (User):

I just played with both Asus models and the Acer today... even more impressive in the flesh than the already excellent figures suggested. I agree that the Acer doesn't quite hit the mark - the Asus units convey a much greater impression of quality. I remember reading that the Acer's screen hinge crapped out during the media launch and it didn't inspire confidence in the demo unit I saw today either.

And not a trackpad problem in sight lol.

29 December 2011, 1:10 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

John in Brisbane (User):

Just bought a ux21e i3 from the good guys for $850 ... pretty pleased so far. Crazy power button location - right where delete sits in every other laptop and the hinge doesn't have enough friction but overall the unit is awesome.

19 February 2012, 10:16 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

whitey (New user):

How do you use CD's when there is no drive?

12 July 2012, 9:49 AM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

You don't. Or you get a USB DVD drive.

12 July 2012, 10:08 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

John in Brisbane (User):

Update on the UX21e user/ownership experience ... good and bad.

Good:
1. The shell is cooler than I am - almost a little flashy for me :-)
2. Compared to ye olde netbook, the screen and performance is sweet. You can play starcraft2 on it, at minimum settings, yet it weighs 1100grams. Superb.
3. The weight - it makes my old Asus eee 1000he feel like a boat anchor!

Bad:
1. The hinge has weakened further - not good.
2. The touchpad software locks it for a set period of time after a keystroke on the keyboard. It's intrusive to the point of being very annoying when working quickly and can not be changed/switched off. Also, sometimes the parts of the touchpad over the button sections register your input, sometimes they don't.
3. I'm lucky to see 3 hours of productivity work on the battery despite it being set to declock the CPU when off mains. That's about 1/3rd of what the old netbook used to get.
4. The SSD - folks, 64 gigs isn't close to enough. There's a stack of Asus bloatware that can't be removed and with the recovery partition I was left with 30 something gigs for programs and files ... not good enough.
5. The position of the delete button - which nongs thought that was acceptable? Seriously, I want names.

Basically, I loved the ultrabook formula before I purchased and it's only been confirmed. This unit is going back though - the hinge, touchpad and battery are not up to scratch. I won't be seeking a replacement however - I had 3 faulty Asus notebooks in a row last year and it was only the good deal (and awesome reviews) that caused me to give them another chance. I'll take the cash and (at this stage) I think I'll buy my first non-Asus notebook in 5 years - a Toshiba z830. Less style, more substance? Maybe.

PS - Odysseus - the viewing angles are crap! There's nothing "premium" about the screen.

15 July 2012, 2:21 AM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

odysseus (New user):

Hi John,
Well, I _did_ buy it (the ux21) and I can nod at most of your pros and cons. The hinge is a bit dodgy and battery life could be a lot better. I'm still "getting used to" the position of the delete button, and it may never happen. The touchpad hasn't been such a problem for me, though I understand from anandtech.com that they changed the touchpad supplier midway through production (or maybe it was the firmware?).
You're right about the viewing angles on the screen too - it's fiddly adjusting and readjusting the screen 'cos the "good" range of angles is narrow.
I also find the keyboard a bit difficult, esp. the spacebar - I often micrap and have to go back and insert a space.
BUT for all that I would buy it again. Why? I got it on runout, for $675 - pretty darn good. It weighs 1.1kg, as you say - that's a massive improvement on the old standard of the 2.5kg 15.6" notebook with a 1366x768 screen, esp. considering the screen resolution is the same.
BTW John, before you go away from Asus, look at anandtech's review of the next-gen ux's: IPS screens, better keyboards, and other improvements. Anand is a hard marker, yet he has good things to say about them.

15 July 2012, 8:15 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

John in Brisbane (User):

Hi there,
Nice price! I paid $850 but I saw them going at the price you paid and told a few ppl.
Look I am on a short fuse with these guys, given my previous experience but I also try not to go purely on my anecdotal evidence/experience. When I googled the hinge issue, I saw other ppl with problems but I also saw a YT vid showing one with good friction.
I always knew that I was buying in before the 2nd, more sorted generation of this new format - something I tend to avoid. The Toshiba is kind of "ultrabook v1.5" and with the 3rd gen intels now out, the 2nd gen ones going for $999 with a 128gig ssd and core i5. At $325 more than what you paid, that's about right as the price for an upgrade.
Having said all that, I'm about to check out that anandtech review :-) cheers John

15 July 2012, 8:40 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

odysseus (New user):

the review:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5843/asus-zenbook-prime-ux21a-review

also, forgot to mention, it's 1080p - both 11.6" and 13.3".

15 July 2012, 8:50 PM (10 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user