Australia gets new Minister for Broadband

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

Dan Warne29 November 2007, 11:22 PM

For the first time, Australia has a minister for broadband. Not before time, we say... was it really that hard?


Australia now has a minister for broadband, under Kevin Rudd’s new cabinet lineup. Senator Stephen Conroy will be the minister for broadband, communications and digital economy.

Prime Minister Elect Rudd announced the new cabinet in Canberra this morning.

Senator Conroy will now be tasked with implementing the Labor Government’s plan of spending $5 billion to build a national fibre-to-the-node network, in partnership with private funding provided by a telco.

For the first time in years, Telstra has stopped attacking the government, with the company’s pugnacous policy chief Phil Burgess posting a blog comment endorsing the Labor government in glowing terms.

"Labor Party leaders fully understand and appreciate the direct link between the deployment of open-access high-speed broadband and Australia’s future economic prosperity,” Burgess writes.

"This is all good because that is also the way we at Telstra see it," he says.

Burgess’ use of the words “open-access” is interesting given Telstra’s whole emphasis for its fibre build has been on restricting competitor access as much as possible – or at least, making it financially unviable for them to use it.

When Telstra technology chief Greg Winn launched plans for the fibre network on November 17, 2005, he said, "We're not building the network for Optus, SingTel or any other competitor. We're building the network for Telstra's use with Telstra's customers."

Clearly, the company has softened its stance since, but its ongoing dispute with the former Howard government was over regulation that it claimed required the company to give access to competitors at a cost that did not allow it to earn a ‘competitive return’ on its investment.

"When prices are set below cost, Telstra’s shareholders pick up the difference," the company says.

However, independent economic consultants employed by the competition regulator to assess Telstra’s costs in access disputes frequently disagree with Telstra about its real costs.

In reality, Telstra will be hoping to lobby the Labor government to scrap or reduce regulations to allow it to charge whatever it likes for access to its new fibre network.

Given that a central part of conservative political theory is light-touch, non-interventionist government and letting the free market operate, it speaks volumes that the former conservative government thought it so important to strongly regulate Telstra.

New Broadband Minister Stephen Conroy will need a steely resolve to keep Telstra both on-side and under control, while finding a balance that allows Australia to get the promised fibre network at acceptable pricing.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

dragonmeister:

The backscratching has already started.
Of course, Telstra is happy !
The Labour Party has just increased Telstra's hardware monopoly ... Watch the telco pricing climb !!!

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Chad Leverington:

Why are the politicians choosing a technology?

It shouldn't be $4.7 billion to build FTTN, it should be $4.7 billion to invest in a broadband solution for Australia.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Adam:

FTTN is the broadband solution.... personally I can't wait till it all happens, Telstra or not.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

BryceR:

But the real question is, will he do anything of significance

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

dragonmeister:

Significant, Relevant, Important, Responsible ???
Here is a quote about politicians that will just about cover it !!!

"Authoritarian government required to speak, is silent... Representative government required to speak, lies with impunity". - Napoleon

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Brendan:

"[...] in partnership with private funding provided by a telco."

This "telco" wouldn't happen to be Telstra would it?

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

tin:

Sounds like Telstra think it is...
I suspect that if they are awarded the contract, we'll all lose again.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo:

I thought the whole idea of this government initiative was to provide cheaper and faster internet to Australians so we can be on par with the rest of the world.

Telstra is not cheap, it is one of the (if not the) most expensive ISP in Australia. I don't want to have anything to do with Telstra nor do a lot of Australians. So it should be ensured that this network does not compromise to Telstra's domineering philosophy.

I want to see an end to these pety data limits and exhorbitant pricings of Australian internet and start to see internet like it is in the rest of the world and the way it should be, fast and cheap.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

rod:

Again this sound like Telstra bashing comment why don't you guy's wait and see what telstra is capable off, before you start giving telstra and the goverment a mouthfull about the plans that they have for all Australians.I have been with optus, Unwired, and many more and nobody could provide me with a stable service like Telstra has and to be able to speak to someone in the call center that actually speaks english thats a bonus too.
As far as im concern all telco just look at the dollar sign and not customers needs.
when it comes to stable service and connetivity you get what you pay for.
ps: by the way i don't work for telstra.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Marke:

"why don't you guy's wait and see what telstra is capable off"

We have all seen what Telstra is capable of, and its ripping off its customers and limiting potential broadband subscribers. You are correct in one sence "Telstra is capable 'OFF'". Now lets all 'OFF' Telstra.

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

mix:

we have seen what there capable of and that is over charging and slowing Australia down in the technology race.

a FTTN network needs to be 100% publicly owned no matter what the cost, look at the big picture

thats what Korea did and they have the best broadband in the world.

and since fiber will probably still be used in 50 years to come it's a worth while investment

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tonyz:


Sooner or later the government will have to force Telstra to split into two. As a routine investor in the stock market, demergers benefit the shareholders and management, so I still don't get why Telstra aren't doing this of their own accord.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Fred Nerk:

I agree. I have said it for years, and I'm only still in my twenties that Telstra needs to be demerged from its line businesses and compete on the same playing field as the rest of its competitors. You cannot have a company competing, whilst owning the economic means by which the competition occurs. Crazy. It means that telstra's shareholders pick up the tab, which isn't fair to them, or the competitors.

Demerge - NOW!

29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Peter Bell:

Perhaps the new Federal Government might look across the ditch for ideas?
The New Zealand Government is forcing that country's dominant telco (Telecom New Zealand) to split into three (wholesale, retail and network operations).
Telecom NZ forced to split


29 February 2008, 8:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

1337 H4xx0r:

Minister for broadband!?

What about a minister for dial-up?

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags