Banned iPhone ad shown in Australia

Dan Warne03 December 2008, 10:00 AM

Did you buy the iPhone based on promises of "really fast' 3G, only to find it was a dog speed-wise? You've been sucked in by iPhone ads, banned overseas for false advertising.


Apple has built one of the strongest brands in the world thanks to savvy marketing and clever advertising, but its UK marketing team recently got into trouble for stretching the truth just a little too far. Last week, the British Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) demanded the removal of a recent iPhone 3G television advertisement airing in the UK, stating that it exaggerated the speed of the iPhone. However, a nearly identical version of the advert has also aired in Australia, which would have misled consumers about the iPhone's speed in exactly the same way.

In the UK, seventeen separate complaints were lodged to the ASA complaining about the advert, resulting in an ASA adjudication calling for the removal of the advert. The key concern was the advertisement’s repeated use of the term “really fast”, especially in regards to Internet downloads and browsing. The voiceover was accompanied by video of an iPhone accessing web pages and applications almost instantaneously.

Apple responded to the complaints by stating that the claims in the ad were “relative rather than absolute in nature”, especially as the opening line of the advert asked viewers “So what’s great about 3G?”. It claimed that this clearly positioned the advert as a comparison of 3G over 2G, rather than an accurate representation of how the phone worked in the real world.

PC Pro magazine took it upon themselves to replicate the exact tasks depicted in the advert on a real 3G iPhone. What took 29 seconds in TV land, took 2 minutes and 21 seconds in the real world, a whopping fivefold increase between fantasy and reality. After watching the UK ad, we realised that the Australian Optus iPhone 3G advertisement was almost identical. A quick YouTube search confirmed as much.Considering the much publicised issues with poor performance on the Optus 3G network, and our own hands-on time with an Optus iPhone 3G, we think the local advertisement is probably even more of an exaggeration than the UK’s.

We’re not sure if the Aussie version of the advert is still being shown, although we do recall seeing it in the last week or so. We’ll be in touch with Optus and the Advertising Federation of Australia this week to see if the UK ruling will have any impact on the use of the ad in Australia. Stay tuned.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Halcon (Advanced member):

Take down that misleading advertising and make Apple pay a big fine for breaching the advertisements standards here in Australia.

03 December 2008, 12:40 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

If you bought an iPhone because you believed those ads were a depiction of real life, then you're an idiot... Next time I walk into Hungry Jacks I'm gonna throw their burger back in their face, screaming that it looks nothing like the ad on TV and demand my money back.

The test for what is misleading is not a test on a person who is, for example, quite unusually stupid (for the type of person whom the conduct is likely to be exposed.) The question is not whether the purchaser was deceived, but whether the content was misleading. [Franki J, Annand & Thompson Pty Ltd v TPC (1979)]

I would say a person who believes anything in an ad on TV is 'quite unusually stupid.'

03 December 2008, 7:13 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting McBanjo:
Next time I walk into Hungry Jacks I'm gonna throw their burger back in their face, screaming that it looks nothing like the ad on TV and demand my money back.

I loved that scene in the Michael Douglas movie - Falling Down




03 December 2008, 7:35 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

gankul (Cornerstone member):

Its misleading because the ad makes it look likes its real life speeds. That is the misleading point, and its not that fast, no-where near it.

Whats your definition of stupid people? should we not believe anything we see on ad's? so based on that point shout we just allow companies to show anything they want and no matter how wrong it is, just blame it on the stupid people watching it?

04 December 2008, 10:06 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Halcon (Advanced member):

I seen an Optus advertisement featuring the Iphone, Apple expect to brainwash a downtrodden audience with this piece of junk.
Out there in the dirty street, a lot of mobile phone dealers can offer you a decent phone without the parrot talk in the Apple ad.
Tried and tested brands offer superior quality than the opportunist Apple brand, just ask to the nearest mobile phone dealer which phone can offer you better reception and features (excluding Apple of course) and you will notice the real difference.
Another thing, Appple Iphone has been classified as a poorers mobile phone, too bad isn't it?

03 December 2008, 8:06 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

Yeah, sure, I'll ask the mobile phone dealer what phone 'I' need. I'm sure they'll be motivated on ensuring I get a great phone and not one which pays the dealer the highest commissions. And just because you haven't tried and tested the iPhone doesn't mean that it's not a tried and tested phone. Apple's QA is beyond any other mobile phone providers'.

03 December 2008, 11:39 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting McBanjo:
Apple's QA is beyond any other mobile phone providers'.

QA? What does QA have to do with it? Sure you don't mean QC? in any case, QA or QC will do nothing to overcome limitations in design. And in house QA or QC will play no part in ensuring that 3rd party vendors offer customers the appropriate solution.




04 December 2008, 8:36 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

NetR@nger (User):

I have the latest nokia communicator and quite frankly it would tear the iphone a new one

04 December 2008, 11:35 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting NetR@nger:
I have the latest nokia communicator and quite frankly it would tear the iphone a new one

Is it wise to carry a phone that tears in your trouser pockets? It must be a nervous moment every time it rings.

We all have personal preferences but what does that have to do with the topic?


04 December 2008, 12:25 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags