Bland budget for broadband battlers

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

Angus Kidman08 May 2007, 11:16 AM

Anyone looking for a broadband war between political parties following Tuesday's Federal Budget is set to be bitterly disappointed -- the most exciting technology development is pre-filled tax forms if you submit electronically. Yes, really.


Anyone looking for a broadband war between political parties following Tuesday's Federal Budget is set to be bitterly disappointed -- the most exciting technology development is pre-filled tax forms if you submit electronically. Yes, really.

Following the Labor Party's outline of plans to spend $4.7 billion on a national fibre network earlier this year, there was an expectation that the Coalition Government might respond in kind, offering some form of incentive for firing up Australia's broadband market. OK, it wasn't a strong hope -- after all, it was the current government that claimed to have created a competitive regime but didn't regulate effectively enough to stop Telstra hogging all the copper -- but there was still a glimmer of hope.

Well, that glimmer has now been well and truly extinguished. The only comments in the budget papers relating to broadband came under the unexciting heading 'Telecommunications: Ongoing Initiatives' , and offered nothing more than restatements of existing plans such as the Broadband Guarantee and Clever Networks programs. New funding for networks? Not a glimpse. Any plans to give new teeth to the ACCC? As if.

Barring the somewhat anticipated expansion of subsidies for solar power installations, the most technologically complex development in the entire budget seemed to be $20 million for an Australian Taxation Office software development project. For the 50% odd of Australians who already file electronically, the ATO will now offer pre-filled returns, complete with salary, benefit and health insurance information. Handy if you're a standard salary earner, but hardly an earth-shattering development.

"Australia's future prosperity will depend on how we respond to developments in the environment, technology and the world economy," the budget papers note. As far as technology goes, it looks like the response rate will be slow.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

raindog:

So what were you expecting Angus? The Govt to get into bed with Telstra just like the opposition was proposing? Timed data rates for everyone.

The sooner all the bulls**t about broadband availability is shown up for what it is the better! A telstra deal would have us all on 2 year contracts, open ended payments and poor customer service.

Show me a Telstra plan that will give me 40G/month of business grade ADSL, with a 3 month lock-in, static IP for under $100/month and you'll be able to solve the drought in your next move.

Australia does deserve better broadband! but it's not the the sole item holding business back! And its delay has been mostly at the hands of Telstra.

Fibre to the node at what cost? Any political party that wants to push an agenda like this will do so at there peril!

As for electronic lodgements well gee-whiz I'm excited too.



29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mcrackn:

I'm pretty sure the oppositions plan was to sell off the rest of Telstra (instead of leaving it half retail\half infrastructure) and using the money to start another government owned infrastructure project, involving quite a number of different ISPs. I'm not sure on the details.

29 February 2008, 8:42 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

mark:

Yea, it is fair that I have to pay $90 p/m for a 128kb ISDN home connection because I live about 6km from the telstra exchange.

mmmm.... now what sort of plan could I get on ADSL for $90 p/m.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

And you think you'll get affordable fibre anywhere there isn't already ADSL? Dreaming!

Know why your ISDN costs $90/month? Because Telstra can, that's why! Imagine giving them monopoly control of fibre? No thanks. Or why not try that NextG broadband replacement they are so keen to peddle?


29 February 2008, 8:42 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Croc:

Maybe we can get foriegn owned carriers to start installing infrastructure without using taxpayers money? Dream on!!

29 February 2008, 8:42 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

A Telstra Customer:

Telstra has a plan to invest $4.1 billion in high-speed broadband infrastructure for Australia. This is a real plan, and Telstra is ready to get out there and do it. There is enough competition in the Australian market, I wish the ACCC would let Telstra build this network. Then let the consumers decide if they buy a service on it or not.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Also a Telstra Customer:

lol - could you be anymore obvious about being a Te$tra employee?

I will personally vote and support any government that will privatise the remains of Telstra, thens build and maintain a goverment owned infrastrucure for Australia's net future; an infrastructure that will be available for any company wishing to use it at the same price for all. Then perhaps we might see competition and innovation.

What does Telstra think about that?

29 February 2008, 8:42 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

I wish the ACCC would let Telstra build this network. Then let the consumers decide if they buy a service on it or not.

Check those facts, the ACCC is not stopping the contruction of any fibre network. The ACCC is saying no to monopoly of any network. Telstra like a spoilt child has taken bat and ball and is sulking to any ear that will listen.

29 February 2008, 8:42 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags