Church of Scientology banned from editing Wikipedia

Samantha Rose Hunt02 June 2009, 4:00 PM

In an effort to protect its online history Wikipedia.org has announced what could be considered the biggest ban in history.


Wikipedia has revoked the rights of any IP addresses which are connected to the Church of Scientology to contribute to the open encyclopedia. This ban is the first time an entire  organization has been booted from the site.

Wikipedia is the eighth largest site on the web, and contains a wealth of user compiled, edited and submitted data and information.

After citing a long history of inaccuracy and abuse by members of the Church of Scientology, the Arbitration Committee - the body which governs Wikipedia - came to a conclusion which ended in a 10 to 0 vote, with one abstention.  The church was banned due to biased edits. The church was accused by administration of "openly editing [Scientology-related articles] from Church of Scientology equipment and apparently coordinating their activities, damaging Wikipedia's reputation for neutrality."


Scientologists were also caught utilizing different addresses in attempts to try and hide the biased editing.

Under the ruling reached by The Arbitration Committee, Scientology IPs will “be blocked as if they were open proxies" however Wikipedia will allow individual contributors to request exemptions to this ruling.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Pauly (User):

Ah The Mental Science of Modern Wealth - such poor trodden on souls.

02 June 2009, 5:09 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply
02 June 2009, 7:53 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

straker135 (Regular user):

It is time these fruit-loops were prevented from endangering ordinary crazy people. Dont they get it that their founder was a (fairly ordinary)science fiction writer who made the whole thing up?? It offends me that they can call themselves a church, claim they are a religion and claim tax exempt status. If they were a charity I would have no problem with the latter. The gullibility of people beggars belief sometimes...
"When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing - they believe in anything." G K Chesterton

02 June 2009, 8:11 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Senior member):

Quoting straker135:
Dont they get it that their founder was a (fairly ordinary)science fiction writer who made the whole thing up??

And just how does this differ to any other religion?

That aside, Scientology is dangerous and pervasive. Take, for example, the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR). It sounds like a genuine organisation; however, it is simply an off-shoot of Scientology. France is taking the right move in banning Scientology and it is time for the rest of the word to follow . . . largely because it it the only way to protect the gullible.

As for your quotation, ""When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing - they believe in anything." I would change it to, "When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing - they believe in themselves!"

02 June 2009, 9:49 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

rjsquires (User):

This is the first step to banning all cults from Wikipedia!!!

Now if only they could stop the ALP from editing Senator Conroy's wikipedia page!!! lol :P

02 June 2009, 9:56 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting rjsquires:
Now if only they could stop the ALP from editing Senator Conroy's wikipedia page!!!

Now Stephen isn't editing out the bit where he's delayed "broadband to the bush" by a decade? Is he?


02 June 2009, 11:05 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Halcon (Advanced member):

Well done Wikipedia!
Many ex followers have called to the FBI to stop the activities of this dangerous cult; It's time to get rid of these lunatics that brainwash the minds of vulnerable people, also is time this government do the same to banning altogether this cult.

03 June 2009, 1:33 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ChrsRed (New user):

At some point you have to draw the line, and Wikipedia drew the line. The site is not a site for propaganda and is not the place for self-promotion. Besides, the nerve of these people is ridiculous seems like they need to be taken down a couple o'notches: http://www.newsy.com/videos/religion_in_reference

03 June 2009, 3:47 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

The Big Baboo (User):

Yaaaaaaaaaaaay And it's about Tom and all his scurfy mates were banned from everywhere humanly possible and probably other parts of the universe as well. I read that book once many years ago and what a jumbled mash of ideas that fellow had.I reckon Ron J. was on some seriously heavy drugs when he was writing.

03 June 2009, 11:04 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Pauly (User):

Quoting The Big Baboo:
I reckon Ron J. was on some seriously heavy drugs when he was writing.

There is some evidence that there were plants that had halucinogenic properties if eaten in the region where people claim to have seen Jesus walk on water. they just had a 2000 year head start. Now to hunt for the lost Wikkipapyrus scrolls of silicon valley


03 June 2009, 11:31 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

The Big Baboo (User):

Quoting Pauly:
Where people claim to have seen Jesus walk on water. They just had a 2000 year head start.
:) Ah yes Pauly but as we all know Jesus was just out for a bit of a wander around and on the lake :) Ron J. and his mob reckon they created
the universe. I take great exception to that being the mild mannered person that I am :)




04 June 2009, 11:45 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags