Conroy denies plans to make filter avoidance illegal

Renai LeMay
30 April 2010, 11:20 AM


Despite the government saying it would look poorly on ISPs who promoted ways to avoid the net filter, Stephen Conroy says he won't make it illegal.


The office of Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has acknowledged the existence of a protected online forum used to discuss controversial issues about the internet filter, but has appeared to reject forum suggestions from departmental officials that the Government could make it an offence to promote methods of circumventing the filter.

The site is being hosted internally by the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (DBCDE). In screenshots sighted by APC today, ISPs such as Pacific Internet and Webshield — which will be required to implement the scheme if it goes ahead — discuss the filter with un-named departmental officials.

In the forum postings, officials from Conroy’s Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy wrote they were exploring whether the planned filter legislation needed to make the specifici promotion of means of circumventing the technology — by ISPs, for example — an offence.

In response to a question about whether it could confirm the option was being explored, Conroy’s office issued a statement saying the Government “will not be creating any specific offences in relation to circumvention”.

Online rights advocacy group Electronic Frontiers Australia — which revealed the existence of the online forum within DBCDE today — immediately slammed its creation as a “secret club”, but Conroy’s office said it was one aspect of consultations with ISPs on the implementation of the ISP filter.

“All Australian ISPs were invited to participate,” the statement said.

The Minister’s office also responded to a variety of other contentious issues raised by the Department in the online forum.

On the issue of high-traffic sites hosting refused classification content not being listed on the planned blacklist of banned sites, Conroy’s statement said the Minister had stated publicly that this would be the case if the sites agreed to a process of either removing RC-rated content or blocking it from Australian users when identified through the public complaints process.

On the issue of blocking video games that are refused classification, Conroy’s office said the Government’s approach to filtering overseas-hosted online games would be developed by drawing on the consultation process around the potential R18+ classification for games.

On the issue of timing of the legislation, Conroy’s office said a public consultation on improved transparency measures for the filter had been held, and DBCDE was now working with other Government agencies to consider the submissions and examine whether the ideas could be used.

Once these and other consultation processes are complete, “the legislation will be introduced into Parliament,” Conroy’s office said.

The Minister’s full statement is as follows:

As previously stated the Department of Broadband Communications and the Digital Economy has been consulting with ISPs on the implementation of the ISP filtering component of the Government’s cyber-safety policy. These consultations have involved the use of an online forum to discuss various issues relating to implementation of ISP filtering. All Australian ISPs were invited to participate.

The ISP filtering legislation will be introduced into Parliament as soon as the consultations with industry including on the issue of high usage sites has been completed. The Minister has said publicly that URLs of high traffic sites will not be included on the RC content list if they agree to a process of either removing RC rated content or blocking it from Australian users when identified through the public complaints process.

The Department noted on the online forum that the Minister for Home Affairs released a consultation paper on whether there should be an R18+ category for computer games in Australia. The Government’s approach to filtering overseas-hosted online games will be developed drawing on this consultation process.

The Department also noted that Government’s policy is to introduce legislative amendments to require ISPs to accurately filter specific URLs of overseas hosted internet material which are listed on a Refused Classification (RC) Content list. The policy does not extend beyond the blocking of URLs on the RC Content list.

The legislation will detail the Government’s ISP filtering policy of requiring ISPs to filter a list of Refused Classification URLs. There are a number of filtering technologies available and ISPs will have the flexibility to choose the technology that best meets their network requirements.

The Government has acknowledged that a technically competent user could circumvent filtering. As the Minister has previously said it will not be an offence to circumvent filtering. The Government will not be creating any specific offences in relation to circumvention.

The policy aims to stop inadvertent access to RC content.

The Government is committed to the Cyber Safety policy, which includes ISP-level filtering of Refused Classification content.

A public consultation on improved transparency measures has been held and the Department is now working with other Government agencies to consider the submissions and examine whether the ideas can be used to enhance the proposed accountability and transparency measures.

Once these consultation processes are complete the legislation will be introduced into Parliament.

Delimiter


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Raindog (New user):

That's what he says now. But if Labor convinces enough of the terminally dim to re-elect. Conroy will be right back out there claiming a mandate for a grab bag of repressive legislation.

You've seen his track record folks. Trust him, I don't think so.

01 May 2010, 1:38 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Vampire (New user):

Can some one explain some thing to me please - if we have a free trade agreement with USA how does internet filtering not become an illegal act under that agreement

03 May 2010, 3:51 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Vampire (New user):

Section A: Access To And Use Of Public Telecommunications Services
Article 12.2 : Access And Use
Point 4. Notwithstanding paragraph 3, a Party may take such measures as are necessary to ensure the security and confidentiality of messages subject to the requirement that such measures are not applied in a manner that would constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade in services.
Point 5. 5. Each Party shall ensure that no condition is imposed on access to and use of public telecommunications networks or services, other than as necessary to:
(a) safeguard the public service responsibilities of suppliers of public telecommunications networks or services, in particular their ability to make their networks or services available to the public generally; or
(b) protect the technical integrity of public telecommunications networks or services.

And Goverment Steping in and Becoming an intervining body against Telecomunicaions Privatisations is illegal according to this article in fair trade parctise

Article 12.17 : Independent Regulatory Bodies And Divestment
1. Each Party shall ensure that any telecommunications regulatory body that it establishes or maintains is independent and separate from, and not accountable to, any supplier of public telecommunications service.
2. Each Party shall ensure that the decisions and procedures of its telecommunications regulatory body are impartial with respect to all interested persons. To this end, each Party shall ensure that its regulatory body does not hold a financial interest in any supplier of public telecommunications services, and that any financial interest that the Party holds in a supplier of a public telecommunications services does not influence the decisions and procedures of its telecommunications regulatory body.
3. Where a Party has an ownership interest in a supplier of a public telecommunications service and it intends to reduce or eliminate that interest, it shall notify the other Party as soon as feasible.


03 May 2010, 4:29 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user