Conroy slams Lundy, says Australia getting net filter

Renai LeMay
28 June 2010, 7:07 PM


Stephen Conroy has ridiculed the suggestion that Australians should have a choice to opt-in or opt-out of the proposed internet filter.


Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has reiterated the Government’s support for its mandatory internet filter policy after the change in Prime Minister and has slammed proposed amendments by Senator Kate Lundy that would allow Australians to opt in or out of the technology.

“We have got an election commitment to deliver,” Conroy told journalists in a doorstop interview in Sydney this afternoon (see video). “Just because [Greens Senator] Scott Ludlam says it’s been shelved, doesn’t mean it’s true.”

Conroy reiterated the election commitment statement when asked whether he had spoken to new Prime Minister Julia Gillard about Lundy’s proposed amendments to the filter legislation. Asked about his personal views of the amendments, Conroy had a stronger statement.

“I’m not into opting in to child porn,” he said.

The Minister said consultation around the filter project had taken a little bit longer than the Government had hoped, but it would still be introducing the filter legislation in the second half of 2010.
Asked whether the timing of the Federal election could affect the passage of the legislation, Conroy said it would be up to Gillard to determine the timing of the vote.

Conroy was also asked whether he had participated in any negotiations regarding the controversial data retention regime being considered by the Attorney-General’s Department, which could see ISPs required to store records pertaining to Australians’ email, telephone calls and web browsing habits.

“No, it’s actually Rob McClelland’s portfolio,” he said, referring to the Federal Attorney-General.

Another topic of interest from the press was the status of the Government’s telecommunications reform legislation, which deals with the break-up of Telstra and other matters such as the introduction of stronger consumer safeguards into the telco sector.

Conroy said he was working with Senator Steve Fielding to win his support for the bill, with the Family First parliamentarian to receive briefings from Telstra and NBN Co. Conroy said he hoped that Fielding would support the bill now that Telstra and NBN Co had come to an agreement about the terms under which Telstra would transfer its customers into the NBN and shut down its copper network.

“I spoke to him a couple of times last week. He wants to look at the overall package now, with the amendments, and make a decision,” said Conroy. “We’re providing all the information that we can.”

The lady in green to the right of Conroy in the video is his press secretary, Suzie Brady.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

agami (New user):

There we have it folks, there's no other term for it but Fascism.

This hypocritical self-rightious ignorant prick makes me ashamed to be called an Australian, lest I be marred with the same perception of character.



28 June 2010, 7:53 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

TV Bis (New user):

Quoting agami:
This hypocritical self-rightious ignorant prick makes me ashamed to be called an Australian.

Why is it when someone does not agree with something they start being abusive, also what does being Australian have to do with this?

Why on Earth would you have the option of opt-in or opt-out of the proposed internet filter? You either have it or you don't.

What makes me ashamed of being an Australian is someone who is ashamed of being called an Australian.

It's not the end of the world if the filtering happens or then again maybe it will be????

28 June 2010, 8:43 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

Quoting TV Bis:
Why is it when someone does not agree with something they start being abusive

You could ask Stephen Conroy (or even Kevin Rudd) that question too.
In this case, I suspect sheer frustration at his incompetence being inflicted onto people without their choice.


Quoting TV Bis:
also what does being Australian have to do with this?

It severely effects how much the buffoon's decisions effect you, plus it effects how it is all associated with you internationally... Australia is now a laughing stock on the internet thanks to No-Porn-Stephen.


Quoting TV Bis:
Why on Earth would you have the option of opt-in or opt-out of the proposed internet filter?


Why on earth would you keep bleating on about an election promise for something 99% of people are against? Surely elections are not the only time to judge the public's views...


Quoting TV Bis:
What makes me ashamed of being an Australian is someone who is ashamed of being called an Australian

What makes me ashamed to be Australian is when we are ridiculed in the media internationally. We seem to be copping quite a lot of that lately, usually with the name "Stephen Conroy" listed somewhere in the joke.


Quoting TV Bis:
It's not the end of the world if the filtering happens

No. And it's not the end of the internet either. We'll all just bypass it, albeit at a slower rate than we usually access the internet.
What pisses most people off about it is that:
* we didn't ask for it.
* we don't want it.
* it is a waste of time and money.
* it WILL slow down internet access (regardless of Stephen's comparisons to eye-blink speeds).
* it will create further unnecessary complexity, which for those of us who have to diagnose causes of failure, is just not something we need.

28 June 2010, 9:27 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

Today it's the internet filter and tomorrow it'll be something you might actually care about.

You may or may not know, when any individual from any country visits another, he or she is an ambassador and has to answer questions like "Hey, what's the deal with you guys and [insert puzzling issue here]?"

28 June 2010, 10:03 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

GiantEgg (New user):

There are so many things stupid about what you just said - anyone with half a brain doesn't need me to list them, but for the benefit of those with the, "too long; didn't read" mentality - let me break it down.
Quoting TV Bis:
Why on Earth would you have the option of opt-in or opt-out of the proposed internet filter? You either have it or you don't.

>Oh dear. it's a legislation to "protect families." Why does a single 25 year old bloke living by himself need a filter to pretect him from free content? Or why should a wayward teenage girl be prevented from finding information on abortion?


Quoting TV Bis:
What makes me ashamed of being an Australian is someone who is ashamed of being called an Australian.

>/FACEPALM! you are ashamed of being australian, 'cause you're ashamed of people who are ashamed of being australian?! \
With YOUR intelligence, maybe it's fitting that you're ashamed of yourself.

Quoting TV Bis:
It's not the end of the world if the filtering happens or then again maybe it will be????

>Just what? This is a complete "nothing" statement.



29 June 2010, 7:45 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

Quoting agami:
This hypocritical self-righteous ignorant prick makes me ashamed to be called an Australian

I'm not ashamed to be Australian, but I'm as embarrassed as hell, that as a nation we can so gullible and apathetic as to let narrow minded ideologues like Conroy destroy our standard of life.


30 June 2010, 12:23 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymousewiuu2945u389 (User):

“We have got an election commitment to deliver"

Yeah, and having an election committment certainly ensures that it will get delivered... (And if it does, then does it get delivered properly?)

Why couldn't this election committment be shelved, rather than one that could have benefits for people (I just saw a flying pig!)

28 June 2010, 8:08 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

Why does Stephen's press secretary look so surprised and confused as he speaks? Is that a sign that Stephen Conroy's filter should first be applied to his own mouth?

28 June 2010, 9:13 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

I Geek and I Vote (User):

Because she knows the filter sucks and knows that every time Conroy opens his mouth, the Greens gain more votes.

28 June 2010, 9:24 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

GetRidOfHim (New user):

Stephen Conroy is the sort of ignorant fanatic who would have been at home on the House Committee into UnAmerican Activities in the 50's. It's absolutely essential that we mount a thorough campaign to obliterate him in the next election.

29 June 2010, 12:05 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

FostWare (New user):

How can the ALP be so naive to not realise this sad excuse for a shart is possibly a whole percent swing away from them?

Anyone related to IT or is young enough to know about bypassing filters at work or school (yet old enough to vote) thinks Conroy is a menace to society and deserves to be shafted at the next election.

29 June 2010, 12:11 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Pauly (New user):

well it wont get passed. Greens wont support it and alp wont increase its margin at the next election.
Chalk up a win to the Senate

29 June 2010, 11:06 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Nian (User):

Conroy is a ludite as far as ICT is concerned. Listening to him speak on these matters confirms it. Government is about good management, what good manager would put such a person in such a position? This is a rhetorical question.

29 June 2010, 12:14 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

Quoting Nian:
what good manager would put such a person in such a position?

One trying to get fired perhaps... Or an equally incompetent person.


Quoting Nian:
This is a rhetorical question.

Do I know what rhetorical means?!?!

29 June 2010, 1:34 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

deusexmachina (New user):

I might have almost voted for Gillard....but if they stick to doing this filter then my vote will swing on this issue alone...

29 June 2010, 1:38 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

Quoting deusexmachina:
I might have almost voted for Gillard

You're in her electorate? If not, you would have had to move to vote for her.

29 June 2010, 1:50 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

joelcocks (User):

Well go on then guys, vote liberal at the next election, and watch as every single other country out there surpasses us in net speed cos you know the libs won't do jack about our broadband connections....

29 June 2010, 1:44 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Phil S (New user):

Quoting joelcocks:
Well go on then guys, vote liberal at the next election, and watch as every single other country out there surpasses us in net speed cos you know the libs won't do jack about our broadband connections....


Exactly. This is the reason I'll be voting Labor. The Liberals will probably just implement the filter anyway!

I want fast broadband and i don't want to have to wait 15 years which is what will happen if Abbott gets in (since all he wants to go is get back at Labor and cancel the NBN like they cancelled the coalitions OPEL project)




30 June 2010, 8:04 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

Quoting Phil S:
Well go on then guys, vote liberal

As opposed to voting for a government that has botched every single policy it's touched. You betcha Liberal gets the vote.


Quoting Phil S:
and watch as every single other country out there surpasses us in net speed

Yeah cos after all and after two years of spending Australia has some of the fastest promises of broadband speed in the southern hemisphere. Actual connections? a mere detail eh?


Quoting Phil S:
you know the libs won't do jack about our broadband connections..

How do you know this? Psychic tea leaves? A feeling in your waters? Or had you just decided to help amplify the ALP FUD? If in doubt invent a boogie man.


Quoting Phil S:
This is the reason I'll be voting Labor.

It's a free country and sad as it may be you are able to use your vote to continue the incompetence and to drive our nation way further into deficit.


Quoting Phil S:
The Liberals will probably just implement the filter anyway!

Aw cmon on you can do better than that, why not suggest voting out a self admittedly lost government will cause boils, and claim that the opposition gas a policy to gas budgies and strangle kittens? Just like your statement it needs no basis in fact.


Quoting Phil S:
I want fast broadband and i don't want to have to wait 15 years

You've waited almost three years for absolutely nothing and are likely waiting five to ten for NBN on current estimates. That is if plans remain on target, how many of the other ALP policies have met targets or expectations?


Quoting Phil S:
since all he wants to go is get back at Labor and cancel the NBN

But don't you get it? Once elected TA doesn't need approval from a failed and lost ALP. Cancelling an open ended spend does not preclude a revised and properly planned and budgeted alternative replacing existing plans.


Quoting Phil S:
like they cancelled the coalitions OPEL project

Curious you mention that. Given it was a project that would have been financially insignificant against or in harmony with an NBN plan. And yes many of those who also want broadband would be utilising it NOW. Pity about Conroy's political only actions scuttling the whole deal. Maybe you don't mind waiting so much after all.

Fast broadband is only one of the factor any sane person would consider in deciding their vote. But if you wish to base your decision on swimwear, gender, hair colour, invented bogey men and to avoid the real facts and issues then do so, but don't expect to have yours rants taken seriously.


30 June 2010, 9:25 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kaf (User):

sorry, duplicate post


29 June 2010, 3:06 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kaf (User):

“I’m not into opting in to child porn,” he said.

Yet again avoiding the issue by shouting CHILD PORN even though it is completely not the issue.

No matter how badly Abbot stuffs this country up it can always be fixed. This filter may never be fixed because any discussion about removing it may be Refused Classification for promoting child porn.
That and any other discussion which questions controversial legislation.
We will be prevented from attaining the knowledge to make change in the way we are governed. Or even understanding that something is wrong.

29 June 2010, 3:11 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

GetRidOfHim (New user):

Kaf says:


Quoting kaf:
Yet again avoiding the issue by shouting CHILD PORN even though it is completely not the issue.


Exactly. It's McCarthyism. Conroy and his ilk are dangerous and have to go.



29 June 2010, 3:14 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

SpamsThroughThePortal (New user):

Ugh, Conroy doesn't have a clue about IT and Labor made him minister for broadband. I think I'll be holding that against them for a few elections to come.

30 June 2010, 12:11 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user