Music publishers fail to get rate rise, iTunes stays

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

Danny Gorog03 October 2008, 4:24 PM

iTunes lives to fight another day as the US Copyright Board rejects music publishers' demands for a royalty rate increase.


The US Copyright Royalty Board today announced it would freeze the rate that digital-music stores must pay music publishers.

The rate remains at USD$0.091 per song and applies to both digital downloads and CDs. The rate for ring-tones is nearly three times higher at USD$0.24. The group of music publishers pushing for the increase wanted rates to rise 66 percent across the board.

It means that for now, Apple's threat to close iTunes if the rates went up disappears. While Apple maintained its position that it would shut down the iTunes store if royalty rates were raised, it's unlikely it would have done so. I can't think of anybody in the history of monopolies who just walks away.   While Apple has a greater than 75 percent share of the digital music player market and is the leading retailer of music in the world, its share of the digital download market is far bigger - based on this estimate it may be above 90 percent.

Mike McGuire, a music industry analyst for Gartner, was quoted as saying that the royalty board made a wise decision for consumers, musicians and download stores by not raising rates. The download stores are competing against piracy, where songs are obtained easily and at no cost. This is still a new and struggling industry and now isn't the time for a drastic rate increase that would have an effect on consumer demand for legal music.

This saga, once again highlights the absurdity of the RIAA's mindset. If anything, I'd argue that a drop in digital download costs is required to encourage more people to find their media legally. But don't expect this any time soon.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Good news. RIAA need to sit down, turn on their tiny brains, and start to look at what makes their consumers tick instead of just assuming suing their customers and jacking up prices will work.

03 October 2008, 10:54 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

Once again it's in Apple's nuances. They said they 'may' have to shut down the store, not 'will'. They are just trying to prevent an attack against their bottom-line.

The group of music publishers pushing this must be quite stupid. They are both biting the hand that feeds them and digging their own graves. Or did they just forget about piracy?

05 October 2008, 11:23 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags