REVEALED! CrunchPad Web tablet is built by geeks, for geeks

David Flynn
11 April 2009, 10:11 PM


Spy pics indicate this US$300 touchscreen Web tablet created by TechCrunch founder and Web 2.0 entrepreneur Michael Arrington could even beat Apple to the ‘iTablet’ punch!


One of the most hotly-awaited tech products of 2009 has just broken cover. It’s not the oft-rumoured Apple tablet but it could be the next best thing, and potentially even more popular in its appeal to the geek elite.

It’s the CrunchPad, a touchscreen Web tablet created by alphageek and TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington.



The latest spy shots of the CrunchPad, which has a 12 inch touchscreen and is built solely for the Internet

The concept behind the CrunchPad is simplicity in itself: a slim and lightweight ‘Web tablet’ designed purely for the Internet. No keyboard, just a touch-sensitive 12 inch screen with the obligatory virtual keypad. Linux as the OS, of course, loaded onto a solid state drive for super-fast boot times and nimble performance.

Arrington decided to built the CrunchPad in July last year, when he decided that he wanted such a device but found no-one was making anything like – nor had any plans to do so.


The original concept sketches for the CrunchPad show Apple-esque lines and colours

“I’m tired of waiting” Arrington blogged on TechCrunch.

“I want a dead simple and dirt cheap touch screen web tablet to surf the web. Nothing fancy like the Dell Latitude XT, which costs $2,500. Just a MacBook Air-thin touch screen machine that runs Firefox and possibly Skype on top of a Linux kernel. It doesn’t exist today, and as far as we can tell no one is creating one. So let’s design it, build a few and then open source the specs so anyone can create them.”

Nine months down the track, there are signs that the CrunchPad is almost here. A flurry of spy shots hit the Internet over the Easter weekend, showing a new version of the tablet – now seriously streamlined for the the first rough-hewn prototype – complete with concept packaging.



The leaked shots include these colourful (and also oh-so-Apple) mock-ups of the CrunchPad's retail packaging

The price has drifted up from Arrington’s initial target of US$200 and nudges a more realistic US$300, but it’s none the less one sweet bit of kit.

The device “boots directly to a browser to surf the web” says Arrington. “The operating system exists solely to handle the hardware drivers and run the browser and associated applications.”

“The idea is to turn it on, bypass any desktop interface and go directly to Firefox running in a modified Kiosk mode that effectively turns the browser into the operating system for the device. Add Gears for offline syncing of Google Docs, email, etc., and Skype for communication and you have a machine that will be almost as useful as a desktop but cheaper and more portable than any laptop or tablet PC.”

Flanking the 12.1 inch touchscreen is a Webcam, speakers and a microphone for Skype video-conferencing. Internet connection is via Wi-Fi. Expansion is limited to a single USB port, with only two more jacks for power and headphones.

Clearly, the CrunchPad is all about the Internet. “This machine isn’t for data entry.” Arrington stresses. “The virtual keyboard will make data entry a pain other than for entering credentials, quick searches and maybe light emails. But it is for reading emails and the news, watching videos on Hulu, YouTube, etc., listening to streaming music ... and doing video chat.”

The powerplant is an Intel Atom processor running “a full install of Ubuntu Linux with a custom Webkit browser” with a “total software footprint (of) around 100 MB”. Arrington’s original spec called for a 4GB solid state drive plus 512MB of RAM.

“The machine is as thin as possible (and) runs low-end hardware” Arrington explains. “If all you are doing is running Firefox and Skype, you don’t need a lot of hardware horsepower, which will keep the cost way down.”.

Of course, the CrunchPad isn’t the first device of its kind. Many similar products has been announced and even launched over the years, especially during the heady days of the dot-com boom.

Microsoft even had a crack at this with its Smart Display (also known by the early codename of Mira) of 2002-2003, a concept doomed from day one because it was straight-jacketed by Microsoft’s relentlessly PC-centric vision.

Rather than provide direct access to the Internet, Smart Displays were merely a remote version of your desktop PC’s screen – a large wireless monitor than ran Windows CE and modified Windows Terminal Server technology to connect to your PC as a thin client.

Combining such limited functionality with a price tag of US$800-900 saw the Smart Display dead and buried in less than a year from its launch.

We’ve got the feeling that the CrunchPad will fare much better. It could even turn out to be the hit gadget of 2009.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

McBanjo (New user):

Pfff! Are you kidding? Apple will blast this into last century regardless of price. We all know this.

11 April 2009, 11:20 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kaf (User):

Like they blasted netbooks into last century? Sometimes price does matter. And apples version of this will most likely be unreasonably priced. Like all mac products. I love macs. But any market, albiet niche, where low cost is a key factor is a market where apple will lose out.

12 April 2009, 12:41 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

Yep, it's not just about the device it's the ecosystem. Apple has it, Mike Arrington don't. The brand could take 12-24 months to establish and in a world where Apple releases a similar device the CrunchPad would need to find a niche.

12 April 2009, 12:48 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Phil1 (New user):

hmm, I've been looking for something like this. We'll see if Apple has anything to offer come June. If not, I'll get this.

12 April 2009, 1:38 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

djsflynn (APC staff):

My own take on the Apple 'iPad' vs CrunchPad thang...

Apple would of course have a far superior ecosystem built around everything from their App Store to their real-life Apple Stores where punters could play with and fall in love with the device. It'd work like a treat with the rest of the Applesphere too (eg streaming video from a Time Capsule or other Mac). And Apple would get a HUGE amount of free publicity and exposure form the media, their 'iPad' would instantly be the buzz.

But while there'd undoubtedly be many Apple fans and some consumers who'd rush to be the first with an iPad, I believe there's also a HUGE number of geeks who would like such a device but would be less inclined towards Apple because

1. The Apple equivalent would be more expensive. Perhaps substantially more so. And the geeks would find it hard to justify a significant price difference. Even an extra US$100 for an iPad over the CrunchPad represents a hefty 25% premium, and geeks might struggle to see any real worth in that.

2. The Apple equivalent would undoubtedly be locked down tight, with minimal room for 'hacking' at least until the iPhone mob let loose on it (it'd only make sense that an iPad would run the same OS X core as the iPhone). The CrunchPad is open from the get-go - which not just invites the hacking and customisation that geeks so love, it encourages it.

3. Linux fans and a lot of 'general' geeks who are not Penguinistas would prefer to support an 'open source' model rather than shovel their money to a Big Corporate like Apple or Microsoft.


12 April 2009, 2:46 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (New user):

Of course Apple will make it more expensive. But it'll undoubtedly be better value for money, as is standard Apple practice. The point I'm making is: WindowsPad = no success, so GeekPad = no chance. iPad = great success. People have been predicting this ever since Windows' Tablet PCs failed, it's only a matter of time for it to happen. Apple's the only one that can do it properly.

13 April 2009, 4:29 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

zaeentech (New user):

Will there be a built in WiMax version?

12 April 2009, 5:19 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

zaeentech (New user):

Also will there be a 3G/HSDPA version as well powered by Android?

12 April 2009, 6:01 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Pazin (New user):

+ most 'geeks' are prone to hate it as it hasnt got a keyboard which is physically usable and its probably gonna be bugged as hell.
I HATE TOUCHSCREENS
and when they're scratched too much are the touches going to be accurate?.

the novelty will wear off very soon hopefully.(touchpads are the new gimmick of the century!!!!

12 April 2009, 9:25 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

Lack of keyboard doesn't matter for a super portable device or one designed for just web browsing.
If these come out relatively cheap, I'll be considering getting them for reasons outside of the original design. I can see them being useful for more than the creators purposes.

13 April 2009, 10:53 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Pazin (New user):

i wanna see people make a type of new keyboard that involves certain patterns of touching the screen, it'd be new to people but you would get used to it... eventually.

13 April 2009, 10:08 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ben H (New user):

One USB port means you could add a bluetooth keyboard/mouse combo very easily and there's alot of Bluetooth USB dongles that are no bigger then the size of the USB jack so protrusion from the device would be very minimal. Smart way would be be to have the device handle Bluetooth from the start and save the USB for other devices...This definitely looks promising and will be much cheaper then anything Apple will come up with...

14 April 2009, 12:35 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ash (New user):

If I could read eBooks on one of these, I'm sold. That is, assuming they stick to the $300 price point, which they obviously won't. *sigh*

14 April 2009, 2:11 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user