Dell Adamo vs Apple MacBook Air

David Flynn
18 March 2009, 12:00 AM


It’s the world’s slimmest, sexiest and most stylish Windows notebook, but how does Dell’s new Adamo stack up against the MacBook Air?


Today’s launch of the stunning Adamo will surely result in a flood of articles asking if this is Dell’s MacBook Air killer.

But we’ve gone one better. We’re going to answer that inevitable question with the world’s first head-to-head of these super slim and super sexy sub-notes!

(Readers from the USA, please note: because APC is an Australian publication, any prices we list are Australian retail prices in Australian dollars.)

Design

Take it from us: the Adamo looks like no other Dell you’ve ever seen. The company which made its name building boxes and helping turn the PC into a commodity has invested heavily in design and research over the past few years.

Adamo: the best-looking Dell laptop ever, and arguably the best-looking laptop in the world..?

Indeed, we’d suggest that if Steve Jobs had unveiled an Apple-badged Adamo as last year’s new-look MacBook Pro, the applause would have just as loud and the lustful sighs just as longing. That’s a compliment to Dell’s design team, because good design lives outside the false boundary of brands.

The Adamo follows a straight-cut and decidedly modernistic European mode compared to the tapered and organic futurist conceit of the sylph-like MacBook Air.

In keeping with its ‘luxe laptop’ positioning the Adamo is cast from a machined aluminium frame, finished with a stylishly eye-catching pattern etched on the lid and a scalloped backlit keyboard. Fashionistas will appreciate that the Adamo will be available in Onyx and Pearl, compared to the single silver sheen of the MacBook Air.



The 'Pearl' Adamo has a different pattern etched into the rear of the screen

Given that taste is largely subjective we could declare this catwalk shoot-out a tie. But this is our comparison, and our take is that the Adamo is the world’s most stylish laptop.
Winner: Adamo.

The world’s thinnest laptop?

Dell claims that Adamo is “the world’s thinnest laptop”. Well, yes and no (but mainly yes).


The MacBook's got those tapered lines and a barely-there front end, but when you allow for the
MacBook Air's larger rump the Adamo is slightly thinner on an overall basis


Apple has a little wiggle room to hold onto bragging rights thanks to the MacBook Air’s tapered design, which goes from 0.4 cm (0.16 inches) at the leading edge to 1.94 cm (0.76 inches) at the rear.

Adamo’s consistent height from front to back gives it a profile of 1.64 cm (0.65 inches) – so while Adamo is noticeably thicker at the front, it’s thinner than the MacBook Air when overall width is taken into account.
Winner: Adamo (but we’ll allow that the MacBook Air’s slivered shape could make it feel thinner).

The world’s lightest laptop?

This crown still belongs to the MacBook Air, which barely nudges the scales at 1.36 kg (3 pounds). At 1.81 kg (4 pounds) the Adamo has bugger-all body fat, and just like the MacBook Air it’ll often make you stop and wonder if you remembered to put your laptop in your bag.

The Adamo also has a slightly larger footprint than the MacBook Air – it’s 33 cm (13.4 inches) wide by 24.1 cm (9.5 inches) deep, against the MacBook Air’s 32.5 cm (12.8 inches) and 22.7 cm (8.94 inches).

We’re not trying to split hairs – any notebook that’s not much larger than a sheet of A4 paper and weights less than 2 kg is still brilliant – but a win’s a win.
Winner: MacBook Air.

Performance

While both the Adamo and MacBook Air are fitted with the latest 45nm Penryn-class Core 2 Duo processors, the MacBook Air has the meatier powerplant in Intel’s low-voltage SL series, with a choice between 1.6GHz (SL9300) and 1.8GHz (SL9400).

Dell opted for the less power-hungry but equally less powerful ultra-low voltage Core 2 Duo SU, running at 1.2GHz (SU9300) or 1.4GHz (SU9400).


Both the Adamo and MacBook Air have Intel's small package Core 2 Duo inside,
however Apple chose a much faster version of the pint-size Penryn processor

And there’s much more to this than clock speed: the MacBook Air’s SL chips are packed with 6MB of cache and run through a 1066MHz front size bus, giving them a clear edge over the 3MB cache and 800MHz bus of the parsimonious SU processors

For graphics, Adamo relies on Intel’s embedded GMA X4500HD engine while Apple favours NVIDIA’s GeForce 9400M graphics processor.

The Adamo wins back a point for being able to take 4GB of RAM whereas the MacBook Air is stuck on 2GB, but the MacBook Air still has more muscle to begin with.
Winner: MacBook Air.

Battery

We’re going to have to base this one off the vendor’s stated battery life figures until we can do a side by side test under identical circumstances. Of course, the manufacturer’s battery figures are best viewed through rose-coloured glasses, and in most cases are attainable only under the most aggressive power management settings – low screen brightness, minimal usage and certainly no wireless Internet.

So while Dell rates the Adamo’s six-cell lithium polymer slab as good for five hours, against Apple’s allowance of ‘up to 4.5 hours of wireless productivity’, we don’t feel confident to call this in Dell’s favour without some real-world benchmarking.

It’s also worth noting that the batteries of both the Adamo and MacBook Air are sealed into the chassis rather than be replaceable by the end-user.
Winner: This one’s a tie.

Connectivity: wireless

Dell  takes this round without breaking a sweat. While both the Adamo and MacBook Air pack the mandatory 11n Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 2.1, only Dell lets you option up with integrated 3G (in the higher-spec $4,299 model).


The Adamo's inbuilt 3G card supports 7.2Mbps HSDPA on the 3G and Next G bands,
with a GSP receiver in there for good measure


For bonus points, the wireless card also includes a GPS receiver and is rated to 7.2Mbps on both the 2100MHz 3G and 850MHz Next G bands (although not 900MHz, which Optus and Vodafone are using for their national mobile broadband network extensions).


The door for the SIM card slot, seen above, is located on the right side panel of the Adamo (as the battery and other innards are not accessible by the end-user), and you can choose any mobile broadband carrier

Best of all, you’re not tied to a single telco. While the 3G model of the Adamo will include a Vodafone SIM card and come preloaded with Vodafone’s software (and most likely some sort of sign-up wizard or link), the SIM card’s not activated – leaving it up to the buyer to choose one of the Vodafone plans on offer or sign up to another carrier. The modem isn’t locked to Vodafone, although Dell cautions that it’s not certified for any other network.
Winner: Adamo

Connectivity: wired

This is a simple game of count the ports. The MacBook Air infamously shorts its buyers with a single USB port while the Adamo has three, one of which also doubles an an eSATA port.


The slim panel above hides one of the MacBook's biggest limitations – its single and all-too-cramped USB port

With the Adamo you also get Gigabit Ethernet (missing from the MacBook Air) and a standard DisplayPort socket rather than a far-from-common Mini DisplayPort socket (so you need to shell out $45 for an adaptor available only from Apple).



The Adamo packs a full complement of ports including three USB (one of which doubles as eSATA), Gigabit Ethernet and a standard DisplayPort socket for video output... note, however, they're all located on the rear panel

The only caveat we’d make is that the Adamo relegates all these ports to the rear of the chassis. We doubt there’d be sufficient room on the low profile side panels for anything but the tiny headphone socket, which indeed sensibly lives on the right side panel. While this out-of-sight arrangement undoubtedly benefits the Adamo through clean uncluttered lines, it’s a headache when you need to plug in a USB memory key, iPod or similar device which has only a short-term connection to your notebook.
Winner: Adamo

Display

The Adamo’s 13.4 inch panel provides a barely noticeable boost over the MacBook Air’s 13.3 inch display, but pumps the pixels up from Apple’s 1280 x 800 to a hi-res 1366 x 768 for 720p HD (WXGA 16:9). Yum.
Winner: Adamo

Storage

Both of these bantamweights are stocked with a 128GB solid state drive, but Apple also offers a 120GB hard drive in the entry-level MacBook Air. We’d rather have SSD any day, but the price difference means you can get a MacBook Air for $2,899.
Winner: MacBook Air, for no other reason that choice (and a cheaper price tag) is good

Operating system


You can probably guess who's going to win this bake-off...

The Adamo comes preloaded with the 64-bit edition of Windows Vista Home Premium. The MacBook Air, of course, runs Mac OS X 10.5 and can also run Windows Vista (and XP, and Windows 7 beta, and let you switch between them if you want). So while we don’t want to enter into the OS slanging match, it’s pretty clear which notebook grabs the gold medal here.
Winner: MacBook Air

If you’ve been keeping score, the tally stands at 5-4 in the Adamo’s favour, with battery life a tie (pending some solid testing) and making a subjective call in the Adamo’s favour for design. If you put design in the ‘personal choice’ basket, it’s a draw at 4-4.

Apple gets the gong for more raw grunt, slightly lighter weight, better storage options and Mac OS X. Dell wins on being thinnest (although not by much), having a superior display, plus better wired and wireless connectivity.

So it’s close enough to neck and neck if each factor is weighted evenly, but with the MacBook Air ahead if you want maximum performance and the Adamo if connectivity (especially go-anywhere mobile broadband) is more your thing.

The prices are also comparable, as long as you compare like against like – which means pitting the Adamo against Apple’s 128GB SSD MacBook Air rather than the cheaper model fitted with a hard drive.

At $3,699 for the base model Adamo you get a 1.2GHz processor and 2GB of RAM. An extra $300 brings you up to the MacBook Air ($3,999), with its meatier powerplant but the same amount of RAM and the same size SSD.

Dig around for another $300 on top of that (or $600 more than the standard Adamo) and you’re in line for the premium Adamo – with its 1.4GHz processor, 4GB of RAM, inbuilt 3G HSDPA modem and a bundled USB DVD drive.

Now that you’ve read our call, feel free to chime in with your take on which is the better of the two, and why...



Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

The Penguin (User):

Looks like the MacBook Air then

18 March 2009, 1:12 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Vbthedog (New user):

One thing that confuses me in these areas (and I don't have any motivation to start an OS war here) is that the Air wins points coz it can run Windows, and the Adamo (great name BTW, reminiscent of the first Battlestar Galactica) can't run OSX. Why would it want to? It seems Macs "need" to run Windows to make them respectable, but a Windows beast doesn't need to run Mac OSX? Does this mean that Macs have to run Windows to make them equal? But it's not vice versa? What don't Macs then have that makes them need to run Windows to make them equal?

18 March 2009, 1:25 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

jp (New user):

@ Vbthedog - Macs don't 'need' to run Windows and never have. That's the point. Why would you want to run the God-awful, ugly, glitchy, virus ridden OS that is Windows, when you can have the gorgeous, dreamy, 'it just works' OS X. Windows on Macs was originally a hack, and was never the intention. Windows on a Mac is a bonus at best, but mainly irrelevant. Guess you just don't 'get it', and probably never will. Poor you.

18 March 2009, 10:56 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Vbthedog (New user):

Why are Mac lovers so angry?

18 March 2009, 6:12 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

NetR@nger (New user):

Quoting jp:
Why would you want to run the God-awful, ugly, glitchy, virus ridden OS that is Windows

Your on some powerful stuff there,you don't actually believe that absolute garbage you posted,do you??.If it wasn't for the ipod and iphone,apple would have gone under years ago.Remember this;the most dangerous people are the people that believe there own BS.


18 March 2009, 11:44 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

JP's personal offensive comments were marked for report, now so is your personal attack.

19 March 2009, 12:05 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Phil1 (New user):

$3,699 for the base model Adamo? I'll stick with my $600 netbook thanks.

18 March 2009, 1:36 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

grbeltran (New user):

The base model is $1,999 shipped. just bought one w/ 250 GB SSD. MacBook Air pwnd

18 March 2009, 8:15 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kearnsy (New user):

Quoting grbeltran:
The base model is $1,999 shipped. just bought one w/ 250 GB SSD. MacBook Air pwnd

$1,999 USD!






18 March 2009, 9:40 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tom_NYC (New user):

Design-wise, doesn't the Adamo look so 90's and heavy? The Air looks like "now" or "tomorrow" and could actually float. With a name like "Adamo" the line could end up being pronounced "A Damn 0". In these economic times, the "A Damn 0" is a big gamble, but I am sure there will be buyers. Maybe Bernie Madoff would like to replace his Apple laptop?

18 March 2009, 2:19 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

techdribble (User):

yeah when I buy a laptop I am more concerned with how it looks rather than how it performs NOT. Anybody who buys a computer purely on looks has severe issues.
As for the OS when Apple lets OSX run on other hardware other than their own then we can compare. So saying that Apple win the OS because you can run windows on it is just stupid.


18 March 2009, 8:34 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

JGrant (New user):

720p HD is actually 1280 x 720 square pixels so both of them can display 720p video at full resolution.

I would like to see more about the display in terms of colour depth, response time, refresh rate, brightness and contrast ratio before declaring one a winner based on resolution alone.

18 March 2009, 9:26 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kearnsy (New user):

there is no option to include the WWAN card on the $4300 beast. The only online configuration options on AU atm are for warranty extension (very reasonable upgrade to 3 years) and delivery upgrade.

18 March 2009, 10:00 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

In these tough economic times is it prudent to release what can only be seen as a luxury item?

Yes, there's plenty of people with deep pockets out there, but how many of them are in the market for a luxury slimbook? I wonder how many will Dell have to sell to turn a profit.

Profit is not the difference between Bucket-of-parts and the Sale Price. How much did Dell spend on R&D, Logic, ID, and Marketing?

18 March 2009, 10:03 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

Quoting agami:
Yes, there's plenty of people with deep pockets out there, but how many of them are in the market for a luxury slimbook?

I'm sure there are more than enough willing to shell out the bucks for that myth of desktop style.

Both machines look pretty schmick in the studio photographs, but plug in all the necessary USB crud, add a power brick and a desk-load or unsorted paper. Then Macbook Air or Adamo just looks like any other notebook. All the other features of these machines can be had for a much lower cost.

Value for money? Both machines fail dismally on the value stakes.


18 March 2009, 11:06 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Your Average Joe (User):

Quoting Raindog:
Value for money? Both machine fail dismally on the value stakes.

Dell and Apple do not target these devices for people on the bread line. People with the means may even buy these just for the 'chic' look.
Companies have no pledge to supply outdated machines cheaply to the poor. There's no money in it !




18 March 2009, 2:05 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

Quoting Your Average Joe:
Dell and Apple do not target these devices for people on the bread line.

Well gee-whiz, what does that have to do with value for money?


Quoting Your Average Joe:
People with the means may even buy these just for the 'chic' look.

Clearly! But what does that have to do with a statement about value for money?


Quoting Your Average Joe:
Companies have no pledge to supply outdated machines cheaply to the poor.

Again what does that have to do with value for money? It is ridiculous for you to suggest that anything which is not expensive is somehow outdated. That is clearly nonsense, with Both Dell and Apple offering value for money alternatives to these products which are clearly up to date.


Quoting Your Average Joe:
cheaply to the poor.

When did the poor enter into this? Your clutching for straws.


Quoting Your Average Joe:
There's no money in it !

There is plenty of money to be had at or near the breadline, even if designer laptops may not be a target for that demographic.

Oh and by the way I was replying to Agami, not that that precludes your right to comment my post. Just something for you to consider before another of your poisonous sprays towards me. Touche.


18 March 2009, 2:56 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

SLi (User):

Saying that the Macbook Air wins simply because it can run windows OS's while the Dell can't run OSX is pathetic.

18 March 2009, 10:26 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

gankul (User):

and incorrect, since you can install osx onto a standard notebook/pc, so you can run all the os's you could need or want.

18 March 2009, 11:15 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

Quoting SLi:
Saying that the Macbook Air wins simply because it can run windows OS's while the Dell can't run OSX is pathetic.

How so? Doesn't the ability to (legally) run both those operating systems show a clear advantage in any tick box comparison of the two machines?


18 March 2009, 11:33 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

techdribble (User):

Its only an advantage because as I commented earlier Apple lock OSX to their hardware whearas MS and linux for that matter are not. When you can legally run OSX on any PC hardware then we can get a fair comparison until then the giving the Apple hardware the win is stupid because it is the one blocking a fair comparison. What would happen if MS locked out loading Windows on Apple hardware ?

18 March 2009, 1:50 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Your Average Joe (User):

Quoting Raindog:
Doesn't the ability to (legally) run both those operating systems show a clear advantage in any tick box comparison of the two machines?

No ! That's communism/socialism at work.
You would certainly think it a bad idea if you had shares in MS and/or Dell, who have a mutual agreement to support each other for significant financial gains !

Start thinking as a business and you'll start to understand why companies monopolise and/or use proprietry products.




18 March 2009, 2:00 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

Quoting Your Average Joe:
No ! That's communism/socialism at work.

Nonsense!


Quoting Your Average Joe:
You would certainly think it a bad idea if you had shares in MS and/or Dell, who have a mutual agreement to support each other for significant financial gains !

And yet Apple's funders saw running of a competitors operating system or applications on their hardware as a clear advantage. So conspiracy theories and baying about communism/socialism is hardly applicable.
Dell can freely Market Linux as it chooses without contravention of any MS agreement, so the possibility of a Dell running OS-X is there, but an actual licensed product is not.



Quoting Your Average Joe:
Start thinking as a business and you'll start to understand

That's very bold, how many businesses do you run? Your big on insulting my business, where is the track record for yours?


Quoting Your Average Joe:
you'll start to understand why companies monopolise and/or use proprietry(sic) products.

There are many successful businesses which operate without a monopoly or any desire to hold monopoly control. Similarly proprietary limitation can be a detriment rather than an advantage for your business. Proprietary solutions with predatory pricing ultimately disadvantage the customers and any customer in that position will ultimately walk.


18 March 2009, 2:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raydanator (New user):

I have no idea how this review could list Adamo as the display winner. True, screen resolution on the Adamo is better, but um did we just skip over the whole video card thing? The 9400M in the Air is a better integrated card than the Intel X4500...and design to the Adamo?!...what are they smoking?

(Watches self open can of hate inspired, Apple hating worms)

18 March 2009, 4:42 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

NetR@nger (New user):

Quoting raydanator:
The 9400M in the Air is a better integrated card than the Intel X4500..


Yeah it is but being realistic its still a very weak chip.

19 March 2009, 12:02 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Kees (New user):

Quoting NetR@nger:
Quoting raydanator: The 9400M in the Air is a better integrated card than the Intel X4500..Yeah it is but being realistic its still a very weak chip.

what does that have to do with this comparison?

as for the OS. Benchmark PhotoShop on a MacBook Pro on OS X, then run the same benchmark on the same machine in Vista, and it'll be significantly slower. This is a proven fact, google is your friend if you don't believe me.
So clearly, a case can be made for having the option to run OS X is a plus. That Dell is not allowed to put OS X on there machine is irrelevant in a comparison of features.

19 March 2009, 6:03 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

NetR@nger (New user):

Quoting Kees:
what does that have to do with this comparison?


I would have thought quite a bit.

19 March 2009, 9:02 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Waterloo (New user):

Well, the price tag on the Dell is a little steep to say the least. That right there says it all. The only thing I can see that the Dell has going for it are the extra USB ports. I think my wife will stick with her MacBook Air.

19 March 2009, 7:24 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

mattacrazy (New user):

Macbook Air wins for me.
OS X and the 9400m put it over the dell adamo

30 May 2009, 5:05 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AppleMacintosh (New user):

Pretty thorough analysis...I work for Apple so I'm obviously biased, but I think the Adamo makes for an interesting comparison between the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro.

One aspect that was omitted is the environmental impact of both computers. Yes, it's true that some consumers don't care, but some do, and the companies have made choices regarding materials, assembly processes etc. that should be considered.

I can't speak to the Adamo's environmental impact...but Apple's environmental prudence is clear with this product...

Arsenic-free display glass
BFR-free
Mercury-free
LED-backlit display (uses 30% less power)
PVC-free internal cables
Highly recyclable aluminum enclosure and glass display
Meets ENERGY STAR Version 5.0 requirements
Rated EPEAT Gold

17 August 2009, 1:57 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (User):

Quoting AppleMacintosh:
One aspect that was omitted is the environmental impact of both computers.

Um hey, I know this is a way out there idea, but it's probably because in the scheme of thing its environmental impact of a few notebooks is in real terms inconsequential. But hey if people are scratching for any usable differentiation then go for it.


Quoting AppleMacintosh:
I can't speak to the Adamo's environmental impact.

I can! I can attest that Dell like most other top tier computer supplies includes large quantities of safety and recycling material within their sales packages.
It's just as well it's all recyclable. In another life that "Safe usage manual" could possibly be recycled into something that is actually useful to somebody.
Quoting AppleMacintosh:
but Apple's environmental prudence is clear

Yes their was an article on the subject just weeks before this comparison.


Quoting AppleMacintosh:
Arsenic-free display glass

That will save the planet. Macbook pro users can now lick the displays of their machines in absolute safety. The absence of any HV supply also making the licking of Macbook Pros something to be considered entirely safe for all the family.


Quoting AppleMacintosh:
PVC-free internal cables

What a relief, I often lie asleep at night in fear of what the impact of tiny quantities of stray Vinyl Chloride, poly or otherwise, is having on my quality of life.

I don't wish to underplay any efforts by manufactures to minimise environmental impacts but back in reality land the environmental credential of either machine would hardly differ and would be far from being very significant as a buying decision.
Remember most of the whack-jobs who consider such out of proportion impacts wish us to all live in caves wrapped in gluten free muslin, and given caves don't have mains sockets neither manufacturers notebook will satiate this sector of the market.


17 August 2009, 8:51 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AppleMacintosh (New user):

Pretty thorough analysis...I work for Apple so I'm obviously biased, but I think the Adamo makes for an interesting comparison between the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro.

One aspect that was omitted is the environmental impact of both computers. Yes, it's true that some consumers don't care, but some do, and the companies have made choices regarding materials, assembly processes etc. that should be considered.

I can't speak to the Adamo's environmental impact...but Apple's environmental prudence is clear with this product...

Arsenic-free display glass
BFR-free
Mercury-free
LED-backlit display (uses 30% less power)
PVC-free internal cables
Highly recyclable aluminum enclosure and glass display
Meets ENERGY STAR Version 5.0 requirements
Rated EPEAT Gold

17 August 2009, 1:57 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AppleMacintosh (New user):

Pretty thorough analysis...I work for Apple so I'm obviously biased, but I think the Adamo makes for an interesting comparison between the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro.

One aspect that was omitted is the environmental impact of both computers. Yes, it's true that some consumers don't care, but some do, and the companies have made choices regarding materials, assembly processes etc. that should be considered.

I can't speak to the Adamo's environmental impact...but Apple's environmental prudence is clear with this product...

Arsenic-free display glass
BFR-free
Mercury-free
LED-backlit display (uses 30% less power)
PVC-free internal cables
Highly recyclable aluminum enclosure and glass display
Meets ENERGY STAR Version 5.0 requirements
Rated EPEAT Gold

17 August 2009, 1:59 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

yoman11 (New user):

Here's the thing, if you buy a Dell you usually save $1000 vs Apple. No brainer for me all. With that amount of savings I could buy myself an Ipod and still have cash left over. Check it out here: http://bit.ly/9TE7i4

04 June 2010, 8:51 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user