Dell releases ‘Latitude ON’ alternative Linux OS for laptops

David Flynn
29 September 2009, 3:48 PM


Tiny system-on-a-chip module combines fast-boot Linux OS and ARM processor to check email, browse the Web and run for days on a standard laptop battery.


Just over one year ago APC presented the world’s first look at Dell’s auxiliary laptop OS named Latitude ON.

Designed as a stand-alone OS built around a Linux kernel and powered by its own ARM chip, Latitude ON stretches the life of a notebook’s battery from hours to days by sidestepping Windows entirely.

Codenamed ‘Blacktop’, because it aimed to give laptops the same fast functionality as a BlackBerry when it comes to tasks such as email (‘Blacktop’ is of course a portmanteau of ‘BlackBerry’ and ‘laptop’), today sees the full version of Latitude ON makes its debut.

It’s loaded onto the new Latitude Z and available as an optional $249 upgrade to the Latitude E4200and E4300 notebooks.

Latitude ON differs from other pre-boot environments such as Splashtop because it’s a tiny SoC (System on Chip) computer in its own right – although Dell calls it a ‘sub-processor and sub-operating system’.

The OS, which is based on SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 and accompanied by a Firefox-derived browser plus a customised email, diary and contacts organiser, resides in a flash memory chip.

(Dell says it will release the code to Latitude ON as required under the General Public License for open-source software.)

That chip is fitted onto a mini-PCI board alongside an ARM processor with integrated 802.11bg wireless, all in the size of a stick of gum. This stand-alone module runs independently of the notebook’s hard drive or main processor.

That tiny slab of flash memory includes bespoke Linux drivers for the screen, keyboard, trackpad and the 3G mobile broadband card available in select Latitude notebooks as an option.

The clean UI launches into an inbox which works with Exchange 2003, Novel Groupwise, POP and IMPAP servers – Dell says other corporate platforms including Exchange 2007 will be added in the neat future and available as a firmware update.

A basic ‘reader’ version of Latitude ON is already baked into the Latitude E4200 and E4300 notebooks, which provides the ability to read emails and browse the Web, but the new system adds replies and new emails. Users can also read Office and PDF document attachments.

In addition to the calendar and contacts modules, which also sync with Exchange, the browser comes with an inbuilt Citrix client for accessing desktop applications over a VPN. Of course, it can also be used to run conventional online apps such as Google Docs.

The upshot of all this is that Latitude ON can do a hell of a lot for which you’d usually need to run Windows. The advantage is less about its ‘instant on’ launch time than the fact that the laptop’s battery can run for days.

Dell will also market Latitude ON as a ‘spare tyre’ for its laptops. In the event that the hard disk fails or the Windows installation suffers a fatal and unrecoverable error, users can continue to work in the Latitude ON environment.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Aubrey (New user):

"....the new system adds replies and new emails. Users can also read Office and PDF document attachments."

Honestly, how long does Windows take to boot these days? Why not add photoshop and a HTML editor and you could create a website while you wait too?

My latitude netbook boots in 26 seconds from stone cold to a working desktop when running a totally unoptimised Ubuntu 9.10 alpha with a lightweight window manager. I'm betting it gets below 17 seconds by the time it is released and I hack it a bit. That's not even time to plug in the power adapter and mouse let alone reply to a friggin' email or read a pdf.

But I guess if it shows what Linux can do, well and good.



29 September 2009, 6:54 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting Aubrey:
Honestly, how long does Windows take to boot these days?

The sad part is that by the time Windows has taken to load many of the lesser designed windows notebooks have run long enough at near full crack that their CPUs are being throttled back to Celeron pace.


Quoting Aubrey:
Honestly, how long does Windows take to boot these days?

Befor or after it's loaded the first 50 circus packs? :)

Quoting Aubrey:
I'm betting it gets below 17 seconds ....... That's not even time to plug in the power adapter and mouse

While I agree with you entirely, your 17 seconds to insert a plug could well be an indication of the time it takes to get anything done in Canberra.



29 September 2009, 7:06 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony23 (New user):

Quoting Raindog:
the time it takes to get anything done in Canberra.

Raindog, I looked at this, he's not a stooge none of the magic phrases appear:
"acted decisively": read before the GFC we had no clue what to do, thank god we now have an agenda.
"fiscal conservative": say it enough and people will believe
"working families": about to get slugged to pay for our cash splash
"NBN": mention the flashing lights, and it will distract from the complete lack of a cost/benefit analysis.
"Telstra": oooh a common enemy to distract!
"review": we don't have them anymore. Don't even mention the word. ever.
"outcome": linked to review, see above. stop it!
"evidence based policy": What you talkin about willis??!! see "spin"

I think that's the lot, but sing out if I forgot one or two......



29 September 2009, 7:21 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Aubrey (New user):

Quoting Raindog:
While I agree with you entirely, your 17 seconds to insert a plug could well be an indication of the time it takes to get anything done in Canberra.


You have not seen my daisy-chained powerboards or the mess of cables under my desk.

And please remember people, they are NOT CANBERRA"S POLITICIANS - They are yours. We only host their meetings for a few months each year and pack them off back to where they came from. We only get to actually elect four in total (and if you take the time to examine our selection, they scrub up pretty well compared to the rest). If it was up to me, I'd sack the lot and let Ken Henry and Glenn Stevens run the shop - we'd be in even better economic shape and would not have to put up with the spin or the whining of either side. And Ken Henry would at least do something for the Hairy Nosed Wombat (The marsupial that is, not the opposition treasury spokesman).



29 September 2009, 7:40 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting Aubrey:
You have not seen my daisy-chained powerboards or the mess of cables under my desk.

You've done it now, workcover line taps will have crack teams of OHS inspectectors descending on your abode to bore you silly and apply to fine you by invention.


Quoting Aubrey:
And please remember people, they are NOT CANBERRA"S POLITICIANS - They are yours.

I didn't vote for him, or his horse!



Quoting Aubrey:
We only host their meetings for a few months each year

Yes the whole place is just senseless desecration of a once functioning Kangaroo paddock. :>



Quoting Aubrey:
and if you take the time to examine our selection, they scrub up pretty well compared to the rest

Debatable, athough comparisons to some ministers (all too often in shot) could well validate your suggestion.


Quoting Aubrey:
If it was up to me, I'd sack the lot and ......

One has to wonder if in retirement ex PM Howard wonders if he may have been hasty with measures for increased gun control.


Quoting Aubrey:
Ken Henry and Glenn Stevens .... we'd be in even better economic shape

It may have worked in thunderbirds, but I'm not entirely sure it would be a good idea to have governance by puppets. On the other hand it's worked for NSW and Victorian ALP with a succesion of premiers.


Quoting Aubrey:
The marsupial that is, not the opposition treasury spokesman

The latter being far from an endagered species.


29 September 2009, 7:56 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Advanced Forumologist):

Quoting Aubrey:
they are NOT CANBERRA"S POLITICIANS - They are yours.


Please Aubrey, do not lump together thinking people with those others who chose to vote for the current Labor government. I do not consider them to be my politicians!

29 September 2009, 8:19 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Aubrey (New user):

Quoting petert:

Please Aubrey, do not lump together thinking people with those others who chose to vote for the current Labor government. I do not consider them to be my politicians!

Ok. But I'm not sure I would want to be taking any personal responsibility for the current Federal Opposition either. I mean SOMEONE actually decided that the current opposition would more effectively represent the national interest than , say, a flock of lobotomised chickens. That would be close call, IMO.

30 September 2009, 6:34 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting Aubrey:
would more effectively represent the national interest than , say, a flock of lobotomised chickens

Said chickens should definately stand at the next election, it is more than apparent that current communications policy had been devised by a similar pool of talent.


30 September 2009, 7:38 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

The Big Baboo (New user):

Quoting Raindog:
Would more effectively represent the national interest than , say, a flock of lobotomised chickens.
Here,here :) 1 chicken for every pot I say and chips and salad as well.
As for the rat's nest of cables under the desk :( Do these cable makers think that we string all the various parts of the PC all over the room. Tis a pity I'm not an electrician because then I could cut about half a metre of each one and then it could look reasonably tidy.
Nuff said Cya Later :)




30 September 2009, 8:16 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Quoting The Big Baboo:
Tis a pity I'm not an electrician because then I could cut about half a metre of each one and then it could look reasonably tidy.


You can buy 50cm IEC leads pretty easily. Plug packs on the other hand are just painful.
As for being an electrician... It's pretty sad that governments think a piece of paper will stop electrical stupidity. I've seen some pretty bodgy work by licensed cablers/electricians, and real tidy work by unlicensed people. A piece of paper doesn't equal a brain, but politicians seem intent on making it happen (in every way of life).

01 October 2009, 12:00 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting Tin:
I've seen some pretty bodgy work by licensed cablers/electricians, and real tidy work by unlicensed people.

The Cablers licence is a joke, and it seem the amount of study required is inversly proportional to the the cost paid to do the course. At least with your average licenced sparky you know they have done a full trades course, even if most are afraid of electricity.

You dont need to be licensed to work on no fixed cables in your own home, although some catch-all legislation that is a hangaover from the telecom days says anything you do that causes problems to the phone network will cost you.

As much as it grieves me to say it, those Kiwis across the ditch have developed some entirely more reasonable legislation for DIY electrics. The Kiwi logic being your going to do it yourself anyway, so we'd rather you did it safely and correctly. Where as here in AU we have costly and inneffectual ACMA.


01 October 2009, 6:50 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Careful Raindog... Some states DO require a licensed sparky to do non-fixed wiring. Sad but true.
If NSW goes that way, it won't stop me. It's not rocket science to work out what's safe and what's not.

01 October 2009, 8:12 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (New user):

Quoting Tin:
Some states DO require a licensed sparky to do non-fixed wiring.

No state has legislated against wiring of simple power cords, not to say some aren't trying. There is however any amount of intrusive workplace legislation that can take effect.

It's this plain dumb lowest common demominator thinking by governments that nedd to be given the shove. The side entry piggy back plug was withdrawn from sale because some dimmer than usual Queenslander decided to wire one up as a cord socket. From my point of view we are doing the planet a real dis-service by not letting darwin do his work on people that stupid.


02 October 2009, 9:59 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

The Big Baboo (New user):

Quoting Tin:
You can buy 50cm IEC leads pretty easily. Plug packs on the other hand are just painful.
Hi "Raindog" Hi "Tin" :) Hello everyone :):) Yea I have heard about those leads "Tin" but you still need a power pack (I'm using 3 at the moment)just to plug all the various deevices into :( I've managed to get rid of my printer and am really considering if I need a scanner :( tho it does come in useful now and then.As for the leads,I use those cable tie up thingies and it looks reasonably neat and tidy so much so that I don't look down there anymore :) Have a good one chaps :)




02 October 2009, 9:15 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user