Extreme CPU at an extreme price: Intel Sandy Bridge-E Core i7-3960X

Bennett Ring
24 January 2012, 6:00 AM


Intel’s new Sandy Bridge-E processor tends to the extreme: in both performance and price.


Intel’s new premium CPU, the i7-3960X Sandy Bridge-E processor and its accompanying X79 chipset, is aimed squarely at those who have absolutely no regard for pricing and a burning desire for as many cores as possible. This six-cored, 2.27 billion transistor beast is based upon the Sandy Bridge design. As expected given its Intel origins, this CPU is not backwards-compatible with any existing motherboard chipset designs, so you’re going to need to buy a Socket 2011-equipped motherboard to house this huge processor.



Manufactured on the now mature 32 nanometre process, each of the six cores is hyper-threading enabled, delivering a whopping 12 threads of overall performance. Base frequency for the 3960X is a mere 3.3GHz but scales up to a more impressive 3.9GHz once Intel’s Turbo Boost technology kicks in during processor intensive situations.

Given the extreme pricing, we'd have preferred a 4GHz-smashing top frequency, but with so many cores in one package Intel has had to take a slightly more conservative approach. At maximum speed the Thermal Design Power tops out at a rather steamy 130W, and Intel has introduced a new cooler to handle the high loads.

Sadly our overclocking attempts on the unlocked i7-3960X didn’t yield very impressive results, hitting a maximum stable speed of just 4.7GHz on a CPU core voltage of 1.45V. It’s obvious that this chip’s strength -- six cores -- is also its greatest weakness when it comes to overclocking, as the extra cores generate too much heat for entry into the 5GHz club. No doubt extreme coolers will remedy this with a shot of liquid nitrogen.

The Intel i7-3960X is a chip that is as limited in its applications as it is expensive in its pricing, with a recommended customer price of US$999-$1,059. Yet only those users who run extremely threaded applications will notice the benefits delivered by this six-headed behemoth. The vast majority will find Intel’s existing 2nd Generation Core processors a more appealing option, while gamers can save themselves several hundred dollars and get even better performance with an overclocked K-series CPU. However, if you do fit into a select group of digital content creators (and can confirm that your software of choice makes use of six threads or more), Intel has delivered a powerful new product to help speed up your workflow.



Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (User):

Gah... Not another bloody Intel socket!

I absolutely hate diagnosing issues with Intel based systems at work. Even if we have a spare CPU, we have to go digging around to find one for that exact socket.

If they really want to make life hard, why don't they just start selling direct to mobo manufacturers and have them solder them on?!?!

24 January 2012, 7:44 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

John in Brisbane (User):

So is this the next "tick"? If so, they're dreaming. The first gen i7 chips never (imho) got to be good value - at a starting price of $1k I can't imagine these ones ever getting close. Maybe APC should do a "the best rig you can build for the cost of a 6-core i7 CPU" competition?

There are always people who just want "the best" who will buy these - I bet Dell already has their new catalogues printed - so I am sure intel will sell plenty. But when a monkey like me can get 4.8ghz out of a 2500k, and it flogs these $1000 parts, something is up. Can you imagine the same distortion in other sectors? Like smart phones or cars? Nup. This is what happens when one company owns a sector - stupidity. Please AMD, please do something awesome again. Finally bring out that modular Borg device that assimilates as many cpus as you can scratch together... For now, I'll buy in at the next "tock" - maybe - and laugh at the shmucks until then.

25 January 2012, 1:13 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

J876 (User):

Why have Intel released these chips when Ivy Bridge is coming this year?

And I agree, these are a rip off!

Since most games are single threaded there would be not much difference in real-world performance between these and the i5 K-Series chips for games.

Even if you were building a design workstation, why would you buy this thing when you can get a server processor Xeon with six cores and hyperthreading for much cheaper that is built for a large number of threads? Or a standard quad core i7 K-Series (full hyperthreading) quad core processor with the K unlocker? I don't think they will sell many of these.

25 January 2012, 9:53 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

hey? ALL Intel "Extreme edition" chips are the $1K AUST mark. regardless of the value for money, or lack there of, every chip in this SKU was, and always will be pricey.

The 3930K s/2011 which is availabel for about 1/2 the price, is only slightly slower, and only slightly less overclockable.

and i'm sure they'll release a 3920 @ the $300 mark, like they used to have with the 920/950

Quote - But when a monkey like me can get 4.8ghz out of a 2500k, and it flogs these $1000 parts, something is up

Sure, but if you OC the above chip, that 2500k's not going to keep up.

And neither is that AMD FX Chip you're thinking would be the better option for a hex core setup.

Sure, you have the money to burn, and you buy an system based around the above, and you have the nuts to custom water cool and OC the system, you will have a faster system.

BUT it's not value for money.

it's like my car. i have a honda jazz. i've spent MAYBE $35K on it, (buying and doing it up), and it's STILL just a honda jazz, BUT if i wanted something that was as fast, and handled as well, i'd have to spend $60-80K. I know it's still a honda Jazz, but that's value for money.

BUT the jazz has reached it's potential, (i could replace fuel pump, and wind up the boost a little, but that's about it). there's VERY little i can do to make it faster, and to give you an idea, it's MUCH quicker that a Golf GTi, quicker than a WRX, and about as fast as the BMW 1 series M Coupe, you know, then faster ver of the 335i coupe? 3.0l turbo...

Jazz = 225bhp, 303nm @ 12psi. 6200rpm. engine was built to run 16psi, and rev to 7000rpm. stock pump just can't handle the fuel needed. @ 16psi, should make about 250-270bhp.

Current Commodore SV6 makes 220bhp, and 330nm torque. Also weigh's 600-800kg more than the jazz.

Sorry that went soo of topic... you get the idea, right?

25 January 2012, 10:01 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user