APC August 09: Windows 7 hardware guide
RSS feed
Email alert
You must sign up or login to contribute to the APC forums
New user
32 posts
Posted: 16/07/2009 10:07 AM
|
This month in APC magazine we bust the low-spec myths. Windows 7 is touted to run on lower-end hardware than Vista. But does it really? We find out the truth!
Alot of people are already using Windows 7 as their OS. Are you? Did you find the system requirements better or worse than Vistas?
|
|
permalink
Digg
Slashdot
send to a friend
|
Consultant training facilitator
Advanced Forumologist
186 posts
Posted: 16/07/2009 1:07 PM
|
I've not yet used W7; however, the article left me disappointed. Most articles tout W7 as "Vista as it should have been", but the APC article would seem to debunk that idea in respect of hardware requirements. W7 may be better as an OS than Vista, but in terms of hardware requirement, is there really any difference? If not, then MS has again developed over-priced bloatware.
|
|
permalink
Digg
Slashdot
send to a friend
|
User
10 posts
Posted: 20/07/2009 7:07 AM
|
For those that have not yet read it, the article says "there's good news and there's bad news".
The bad news is that the 7's requirements are essentially the same as Vista's.
The good news is that the general level of hardware available now is much better than it was at Vista's launch, so you're more likely to have access to a PC that can run 7 comfortably. You still need 2 Gig of RAM and a better than 1.6 GigHz processor.
So, in other words, Microsoft has done what it's done for the last twenty years: released bloated, slow software and then tread water until the hardware caught up.
|
|
permalink
Digg
Slashdot
send to a friend
|