Free netbooks on their way, thanks to Linux

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

John Carl Villanueva03 July 2009, 1:15 PM

Telcos are starting to think about the money that can be made from giving away "free" netbooks with mobile broadband services -- and Linux is helping make this a reality.


Mobile telcos, who are quite familiar with giving away mobile phones in exchange for a contracted service lock-in period, have been recently challenged to apply the same concept with netbooks. And to make the deal more profitable for telcos, it was suggested that Linux be installed as the default operating system.

The challenge, which is based on an idea that has been circulating around Linux community circles since the dawn of the netbook wars, was brought up by Jim Zemlin, the executive director of Linux Foundation, during an industry forum in Beijing earlier this week.

Many netbooks are priced as much -- or lower -- than many smartphones, making this idea very doable.

Since netbooks work best with web-based apps rather than desktop ones that need CPU grunt, this offer can be very attractive to consumers who want to utilize the full potential of network technologies such as WiMAX, HSPA, EV-DO, and even the older 3G. In Australia, of course, telcos are particularly well set up to offer mobile broadband enabled netbooks, as all the Australia mobile networks offer HSPA, which provides web connections with pretty fast speeds.

Connecting to the Internet through these long-range wireless network technologies plus the help of greatly improved battery lives will allow users to enjoy the full portability qualities of netbooks. Blogging, browsing, chatting through instant messengers, or simply updating your Facebook status can be done practically anywhere for longer durations once this becomes fully implemented.

To give away mobile phones for free, telcos subsidizse the cost of the devices, and slowly get a good return on investment (ROI) during the lock-in period, which is usually 2 years. The low to virtually zero cost of Linux as the software component of a netbook can substantially increase the telcos' potential ROI and thus eliminate a chunk of the financial barriers that can slow this concept down.

In Australia, we've already seen a couple of telcos dabble in providing free netbooks or even notebooks with a mobile broadband contract. In 2008, Optus did a deal with HP/Compaq to offer notebooks at $0 upfront if people took a broadband service. More recently, Vodafone has been exclusively offering the Dell Mini 9 with mobile broadband for $0 upfront.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

bazzawill (New user):

Your article gives a nice argument but unfortunately the reality is that the telco's either don't know what linux is, only know it from the old days where you had to configure it by hand, and don't think they can train staff to support it or that customers will want it. Hence voda's netbook offering contains windows xp as do most netbooks sold in stores now. Oh and buy they way if there is now going to be an influx of free netbooks you might want to look at your site desing I tried to post this from my asus 701 netbook (which is running arch linux) but your registration form does not fit on my screen.

03 July 2009, 4:37 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AlexF (User):

The evidence from previous attempts to shovel Linux as a front-end OS resulted in consumer dissatisfaction and RTM causing about-face by manufacturers. I don't think any telco is gonna return to that failed proposition any time soon just to save $35 on a Windows licence.
Cost of acquisition aside, users don't take well to inherent limited resources preventing installation of games, productivity and entertainment applications they expect to run on a laptop. Once the inherent resource limitations of a Netbook become apparent, the acquisition ends in disappointment.
Web back-ends (ala Google, who went even so far as to make their browser look less like a browser) wants everyone to forget about OS and local applications but that means forgoing all the advantages of consistent GUI and predictable interface to OS and file system. Web-apps have no consistency even when sourced from same back-end supplier.
Simply, a web-page (even with HTML5 or AJAX) is no substitute for a dedicated front-end application and that's where Netbooks end.

04 July 2009, 8:49 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Pauly (Regular user):

Oh goody, more flooding of the Optus network. Explain how averaging 132kbps is HSPA

04 July 2009, 11:12 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ken Johnson (Regular user):

Linux is overrated!!!

06 July 2009, 11:00 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Aubrey (Advanced member):

Quoting Ken Johnson:
Linux is overrated!!!


OMG - turn off all those servers! Its overrated!

But which bits are overrated? Some parts seem pretty well done (to me)


07 July 2009, 7:03 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ken Johnson (Regular user):

Linux is okay for basic mail and internet. You doing stuff like gaming or buying software packages, then Linux is not the OS to use. I rather use Mac 10.5 or Windows 7

07 July 2009, 8:50 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting Ken Johnson:
You doing stuff like gaming or buying software packages

An OS tailored for the purchase of software? How convenient! (for software vendors)

We all know about the shoot-em-ups! But please explain if you will what advantages the commercial offering offer in the act of software purchase? Alternatively you could let us know what Linux aspect you believe restricts your purchasing pleasure. And if you must purchase many application developers will accept donation for themselves of a nominated charity. :>


07 July 2009, 9:19 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting Ken Johnson:
Linux is overrated!!!


So is Windows. So is MacOS (both classic and X).
BeOS was OK, but no one noticed. OS/2 (especially the Win3.1 compatibility) was overrated.
VAX/VMS was really overrated.

We can play that game with pretty much every OS. They're all software written with particular ideas in mind, and some people don't agree with them. It's the people who just badmouth them without a solid reason I find frustrating.

07 July 2009, 10:36 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ken Johnson (Regular user):

Your right, all OS sucked in it's own way. Everybody badmouth Windows. If if wasn't for windows, their would be no jobs available. Can a average person use their I tunes program on Linux NO! They will have to use Wine as a work around. Windows can play games, Mac play games as well. What Linux has Table tennis. I'm speaking from the average user not IT.

07 July 2009, 1:45 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting Ken Johnson:
If if wasn't for windows, their would be no jobs available.

??? A bit of a stretch that one! I guess without windows there would be poverty in the world and wars in foreign lands too?


07 July 2009, 8:21 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting Ken Johnson:
Can a average person use their I tunes program on Linux NO! They will have to use Wine as a work around.

So blame Apple for not supporting a large segment of users (of similar size to their own market share I might add).

Quoting Ken Johnson:
Windows can play games, Mac play games as well. What Linux has Table tennis.


Hmmm. I must have imagined Unreal Tournament, most iD releases, various decent open source games, etc... And that's ignoring WINE running most things without much effort.
All that's completely off topic when we're talking about Netbooks though. They don't run games anyway.

09 July 2009, 2:10 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags