High-end ready? Intel X79 DX79SI review

James Trevaskis
07 February 2012, 6:00 AM


Intel finally acknowledges the enthusiast market with the X79 DX79SI.


Time after time Intel releases desktop boards that are seemingly targeted at the high-end market but without the features to match. Things are different with the release of the X79 DX79SI – Intel has ramped up its effort to deliver features enthusiasts are looking for.



Intel has chosen to stick with the well-known black and blue colour scheme and skull theme. Memo to Intel: we like skulls as much as the next guy but not on our motherboards. This board certainly doesn’t have the same visual appeal as the ASUS Rampage IV Extreme or Gigabyte UD7, but it’s not ugly. The heatsinks are comparable to those of other manufacturers but the heatsink to the left of the CPU is quite loose, which has some potential to damage components if knocked the wrong way.

Also a slight disappointment is the inclusion of only three PCI-E 16x slots and two SATA 6Gb/s ports, with six SATA ports in total. What might entice some users to purchase this board over other high-end offerings is the inclusion of a legacy PCI slot, which many other boards have abandoned. The IO panel is also fairly bare, sporting only two USB 3.0 ports, six USB 2.0 ports, dual Intel Gigabit Ethernet controllers and standard audio outputs.

Memory enthusiasts will be pleased to see the inclusion of eight memory slots, which can support up to 64GB of memory in an 8GB by 8GB configuration. We're very excited to see power and reset buttons included on this release as well as the BIOS entry jumper, which Intel followers have come to expect.

In our performance testing, the Intel board stacked up well against some of the bigger players. During 2D testing, the DX79SI was within 0.5% of the high-end ASUS and GIGABYTE boards. When we moved onto the 3DMark Vantage Performance and Xtreme benchmarks we found the Intel board even overtook the MSI board by 2% in both benchmarks, which is a huge advantage. The DX79SI was on par with everyone else during 3DMark 11 testing, which tells us that this board has no PCI-E bandwidth issues.

The Intel board also has some early memory clocking issues and was not able to reach 2,133MHz, which heavily impacted its bandwidth results and left it loitering in last place, but remarkably matches the super high-end ASUS Rampage IV Extreme in Crysis average frames per second.

The BIOS is extremely easy to get used to and was quite responsive without being amazing. We were able to achieve very similar frequencies on this board as we were with the higher-end offerings from other manufacturers. This board is Intel’s strongest offering yet but the RAM frequency limitations are a massive letdown. While this board hits a good price point and its problems should be resolved in the future with a BIOS update, for the time being they're a major limiting factor.

Available from Intel, retailing for $340.
APC rating: 6/10



Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

NitroWare (New user):

The upper most heatsink was also loose on our review unit which IMO is important if the Intel Liquid Cooling is used.

Not sure how you can compare this directly to the ASUS R4E, different price point (double ?!), PCB dimensions and feature set. the DX79SI ands DX79TO fit in any ATX case made in the last ten years. The R4E does not !!!

The R4F is a fairer comparison to the DX79SI/TO.

How is three PCIE 16X disapointing? X79 as you know is the first chipset to support triple graphics properly.

The IO Panel is bare but you are forgetting this board has two Renesas USB3 Controller one of which drives the front USB3 ports.

Yes the board is unique in that it supports 8 DIMM/64GB as you mentioned but in the standard size ATX form factor which means It will fit in any case.

The BIOS Entry jumper is duplicated by he 'back to bios' buton on the IO Panel which is very handy for tweakers who locked themselves out of BIOS and do not want to clear or jumper

I do not see why a X79 would have PCI bandwidth issues when the graphics slots are now natively driven without being passed through any PCIE switches or lane limitations.

Were you supplied with retail production or pre-production engineering sample and did you load the latest BIOS?

How many 2133 DIMMs did you try? Intel published a public whitepaper describing how to overclock this board to 5GHz combined with the RAM at 2133. THe board supports up to 2400 and many overclockers have used high speed memory in this board fine.

To fill all the memory DIMMS with 2133 you need a 2133 quad channel kit with loose timings such as CL10 or CL11, CL9 is too aggressive.

With SNB-E and X79 too many high speed DIMM puts load on memory controller and appropriate memory or settings is needed.

If you are using an engineering sample CPU that will affect the memory behaviour slightly.

This board is avalible for less than $340 and has a cheaper brother thats $100 less which we wrote up on our website that many publications ignored.

In our own testing the board was above averagr for an Intel Desktop Board however tweakers might want to look elsewhere and those who charge USB devices will not be in luck if they turn this board off.

08 February 2012, 3:22 PM (3 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user