High definition without the wires: wireless HDMI makes its debut

Nathan Davis12 September 2006, 4:26 AM

Are we about to see a storm of high definition, wireless-enabled devices? If this piece of hardware gets its way, it certainly is likely.


Setting up a high definition digital lifestyle without tripping over the spaghetti of wires that start to take over your home is a damn challenge.

Operating bandwidth-hogging applications on a wireless network -- it's nigh on stupidity. Whether a high definition movie or some other network-hungry monstrosity; firing it over a wireless network connection with a reliable transmission is almost a joke.

However, the tides may be about to turn.

Both Tzero Technologies and Analog Devices have recently announced a joint solution for the need of a standards-based wireless alternative to HDMI for streaming high definition content.

Already in possession of a working prototype, the aim, now, is to produce a small board that manufacturers can easily include inside their new devices -- a receiver in TVs and projectors and a transmitter within high definition content players. Apparently this solution will be cheaper than a physical link, with Tzero declaring "HDMI cables are expensive and costly to install, making a wireless solution ideal."

For now, we're dubious of such a claim. We aren't aware of many people who require help with plugging in one cable that handles both audio and video; let alone the price of including a complex transmitter or receiver in every device.

Using Tzero's TZ-7000 chip, the video is compressed using the lossless incarnation (in peak conditions) of the JPEG2000 video compression from Analog Devices. It is consequently decompressed at the receiver, where it is then sent to the display every bit the same as the original data. Lossy compression does kick in, however, when the bandwidth takes a dip.

tzero-tz7000-ref.png

As it is based on the Ultra-Wideband (UWB) standard, it has a limited transmission range, so this is a fairly localised solution in comparison to a WiFi (IEEE 802.11) network. This ultimately allows the display medium to be positioned with a greater level of flexibility than one would ordinarily see when restrained by a physical link.

In terms of numbers, Tzero lists 480Mb/s (megabits per second) with a four to eight metre reach, otherwise it's rated at 100Mb/s with a tenacious 15-30 metre reach. In both cases, there can be a wall every three metres.

Reliability a strong requirement, it should only produce less than one packet error in over two hours of operation. Additionally, household devices that might ordinarily interfere with a WiFi network, such as a microwave, ought to have no effect on this UWB standard. "Immune from interference" is a line being thrown around; we'd love to put that to the test.

For security, all data is encrypted via 128-bit AES so as to suppress curious, neighbourly eyes.

PCI is listed as a supported peripheral interface, and with operating system support for both Windows and Linux, this may well be great news for the home theatre PC buffs.

How integrating this system will affect prices remains to be seen, but if this is picked up by the manufacturers, we may well see AV devices with wireless capability in the very near future.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin:

What frequency is it though?
And immune to interference for how long... In high density living areas, I imagine the possibility for interference is pretty high.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Guy:

Any moves to rid the world of wires is welcome in my book. I still can't believe they haven't come up with a fully wireless consumer-level surround sound system (and I don't mean just rear speaker surround).

As long as the price is right, I'm happy to make compromises elsewhere to make this work. Bring on wireless peripherals, PCs, TVs...

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Teaspoon:

Fully wireless speakers? How are they powered? Speakers currently get strong enough electrical signals down the wires to drive them without any other power source. Wireless speakers will require power to receive the signal and convert it to the electrical signals that drive the speaker.

If you're plugging the speaker into a power socket, how is that different from running any other wire to it? Besides, if you're going to plug the speakers into a power socket you could probably get the signal to them more reliably than wireless using data-over-power.

Maybe you'll choose to use batteries! That way you can have them go flat on you every couple of days.

Or are you going to transmit power to them wirelessly? That'd be cool! You could even put bags of corn kernels into the beams to make popcorn without leaving the couch! Just keep your body clear. Cooking's apparently not a fun thing to have happen to you. :oþ

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Guy:

LOL!! That's brilliant. Can't stop laughing. Corn kernels... classic! :)

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags