How to get ranked quickly by Google - and other tips from Geek Gear's first month

Tony Sarno06 March 2007, 2:22 AM

Now that Geek Gear's up and running, it's dealing with the biggest challenge confronting any e-commerce site: getting prominence on the search engines and in customers' minds.


The Geek Gear team getting the site listed on GoogleThe Geek Gear team getting the site listed on Google

In this blog, Luke Amery, from our partners NetMerchant, outlines key marketing lessons from the first month of Geek Gear.

Getting visitors to a website is a relatively easy task, once you manage to list your website in any of the search engines. Geek Gear is a perfect example of this. We managed to enter Google's index around the 15th of December 2006 and that day we had visits from Eagleville, Tennessee and Oslo, Norway. Of course, these visits were very short lived, which points to the double edged sword of the web: the cost of actually receiving a visit is lower than any other medium, but the effort required to hold someone's attention is as high if not higher. Let's call it the "easy come easy go" effect.

If you have wondered how people submit websites to search engines, we have some good advice for you. By signing up for a Google Analytics account, we were scanned and added to the Google index within days. On other projects where we've manually submitted sites, it's taken up to three months to be included. In the past we had noticed this apparent penalty and avoided it opting instead to place a link on existing websites that had already been included in search engine indexes. This approach reduced the inclusion time frame down significantly, but knowing what we now know, our strategy moving forward will be to sign up for Google Analytics and use the linking strategy for the other search engines.

Can you find Geek Gear in this Google search?Can you find Geek Gear in this Google search?

Obviously two hits, one from the US and one from Scandinavia, is not going to result in e-commerce success. We need to try and make sure we are as close to the top for as many relevant searches as we can be. This is the art of search engine optimisation. There are many people making many claims in this field so it's wise to tread carefully when engaging an "optimiser", especially one that says they can guarantee results.

Frankly, guarantees of search engine results are a contradiction. Application of some simple common sense shows up some big flaws. Google is popular because it gives relevant results, therefore it is in Google's interest to keep results relevant. If people external to Google could manipulate the results directly how long before search results were totally irrelevant? This contention sets the stage for the cat and mouse game that search engine optimisation really is - Optimisers vs. Google Engineers. It is an ongoing battle where Google attempts to produce relevant results and Optimisers attempt to infer the algorithms Google is using to gain advantage.

Our opinion on search engine optimisation is that any trick applied to content is only a temporary win that can be possibly wiped out during the next algorithm or index update. It is much better practice to build a well structured conforming HTML site that uses the structural nature of HTML to describe the important terms within the content of the site. If this is done appropriately as soon as the website is included in the index it is a candidate for all the terms in the content that has been presented. So the next step is to concentrate on ranking.

Google and most other search engines these days pay particular attention to the number of websites pointing to your website. Each link pointing at you is like a vote vouching for your content. The higher the vote, the higher the ranking and the closer to the top of the results. Obtaining inbound links is a challenge. If there wasn't a challenge in it then it would be a poor candidate on which to base rankings.

There are things that can be done, such as inclusion into directories or link exchanges. But again, be careful here, it is more advantageous to be linked by a few high quality sites than thousands of lowly ranked ones. In fact on occasion the quality of the low rank sites can sometimes hurt the ranking effort.

Traditional advertising can be used to drive the right people to the website. The Internet has changed mainstream advertising, ads need not be a choice between brand building and message delivery anymore, it is possible to achieve both by providing a URL on the ad for people who want to learn more. The use of traditional offline media for advertising is still a very critical component for the right venture.

Online paid advertising such as Google Adwords or Yahoo Search Marketing are a simple way to boost traffic to a website. It definitely works to increase visits, but to get the necessary return on paid advertising (online or offline) it's vital to ensure that what's being delivered when people arrive is worthwhile - remember easy come easy go! This is a function of finding what your customers want and targetting marketing effort at them.

When using online paid advertising services it's easy to get caught up in driving traffic to the site and then find that the actual return doesn't match the investment. I have seen plenty of Adword campaigns paying a high price for generic terms. Generic terms cast a wide net and produce a generic set of traffic. This obviously increases visitors but not necessarily the visitors that are specifically interested in your offering. It often pays to reduce your overall traffic but make it much more targeted. More specific campaigns that drive less but more targeted visitors are often more rewarding. No point in paying for clicks for passers by.

The real trick to e-commerce is trust. Can you convince the people visiting the website that you are worth "investing" in?

Some technical strategies for quickly establishing a level of trust are:

* Design, don't skimp on this, people make snap judgements in amazingly small time frames on the look of your website. It needs to look professional and it needs to build confidence.

* Website quality is critical - you can't afford to have broken links, broken images, or script errors. The website should be working for the customers, not getting in their way. Don't become a victim of easy come easy go.

* Geek Gear has applied for an EV SSL certificate. I am told we are a phone call away from being validated. An EV SSL certificate makes the browsers address bar turn green during a secured transaction. This has to help confidence during the checkout (however, a lot of things have to have gone right to get someone to this point).

Some business strategies for trust building are:

* Branding - ideally you have a brand people trust, we are attemping to create our own at Geek Gear, but we have obviously leveraged APC's brand to give it a leg up. Not everyone has a brand like APC to throw around so it is definitely a hard slog but the equation here is no different offline. Brands like Attitude clothing prove it can be done.

* Make sure you have your "red tape" in order. Have contact numbers and email addresses on your website and make sure those contact points are manned. Make sure you have a clearly labelled return policy. Take the uncertainty out of dealing with your business online. Let people know they have a place to come back to.

In most e-commerce projects my company NetMerchant has been involved in, the businesses don't start rolling until they get at least 100 visitors a day. Even with all the publicity from APC, we're well short of that number on Geek Gear. It goes to show what a long hard slog build up an online business is.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

J Webster:

Don't you care about the reputation of APC as an authorative publication?

Anyone who knows anything about user-friendly website design, marketing communication, e-commerce sites and search engines will be laughing at the site you have implemented. It is no surprise to read your comment, "Of course, these visits were very short lived". I'm only surprised they found it all all.

The problems with your Geek Gear site start with the fact that the second largest group of web users cannot view it correctly (usability problem for people with 800 x 600 monitor resolution settings).

Anyone who knows anything about marketing communication knows it is a disaster.

Anyone who knows anything about search engines knows the site will only ever be found with a search that includes "Geek Gear".

I could write an article longer than your original post about what is wrong with the site. Basically, this site could be used as a case study of how to waste money on a website.

How about you open up this discussion to people and invite constructive criticism from experts. Then maybe the novices will get a balanced view and then some good will result from your website and subsequent post.

What makes me angry is that you are supposed to be some sort of authority and a lot of people will believe what you are writing.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne:

You just had your say -- so I'm not sure what you mean by "hope about you open up this discussion to people"!

The point of the whole exercise is to learn from mistakes and let everyone give feedback.

Regarding your feedback about 800x600, virtually all web dev companies have now moved on from 800x600 as a minimum resolution -- statistics for major websites now show 1024x768 is the most common group of browsers (in fact APC stats show that we are split between 1024x768 and 1280x1024 users).  



29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

The stats and feedback I have averaged across several sites concur with the demise of 800 x 600.
Also worth noting is Linux 8% (sad but true) and Apple 4% (PMSL) sometimes you have to be brutal with the amount of effort you put into minority browsers, screen resolutions and operating systems.

29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jason:

Hey lay it off Mr Webster. It's time to move to new technology. 800x600, 14" monitors are no more these days. Many of us are on Widescreen LCD monitors.

New monitors are cheap. Just get a new LCD for $200 that will happily handle 1024x786 as minimium.

To APC hereforward -

Nice site. I will keep checking back for more cool stuff. :)

29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

geeksrme:

Lets face it, if any geeks get to the Geek Gear website using 800x600 they're obviously not true geeks... and since they won't spend money on a better monitor I doubt they'll buy from the site anyway!

29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

J Webster:

Rather than getting bogged down in debates about which monitor stats are correct (some put it as high as 14% http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp), how about discussing the opening statement of the article, "Getting visitors to a website is a relatively easy task, once you manage to list your website in any of the search engines. Geek Gear is a perfect example of this."

If you are going to invest in a shopping cart enabled website you should make some analysis of the sales it needs to generate to pay for its cost. That in turn should involve some estimate of the number of site visitors you need to attract, which brings us to search engine referrals.

I expect your traffic reports will confirm that essentially the Geek Gear site is reliant on people who use its name in their search terms. People searched for "geek coffee" or "geek gadgets" approximately three times more frequently than "Geek Gear".

The search words "backback" and "school backpack" were used in around 140 times more searches than "geek gear". Won't you need a lot of search engine traffic from these and other frequently used product related search terms to pay for your website?

For the record, pages indexed from the site by the search engines as of 8 Mar 07 were:

Google = 50 pages
NineMSN = 136 pages
Yahoo = 3 pages

Looking at some of the pages indexed by Google, they should qualify for many unique search phrases that include the words "apparel", "caps", "t-shirts", "mp3", "clock", "cup", "wifi", "wireless", etc. These will have been used in hundreds of thousands of searches in the last month, and that is just by Australian residents.

What do your Traffic Reports tells us about the total search engine referrals and unique search words used to find your site? Is this volume of traffic on target with that needed to pay for your website?

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

Come on JW you were the one ranting about reputations etc.

Tony presented an opinion which was correct for that type of product.

Website statistics are a tool for interpretaion and they alone will not generate a single sale. Any decent stats will show the usage patterns the pages visited and the lenght of stay. The art is selectively attracting the right targets to your site. Your scatter gun approach of loosly linked keywords will increase your bandwith usage but it wont sell any more products.

I can generate 1000's of hits with very little effort, that's easy, attracting more customers than your site can service or attracting the wrong people is just as detrimental.

How many people looking for "clock" would be interested in what geek geer has to offer? Would it be good or bad to attract such clicks?


29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

J Webster:

I couldn't agree more Raindog.

Yes, traffic reports are not perfect but if you don't get any traffic you can't make a sale.

I did say search phrases that "include the words"... and relavancy of the search phrase is crucial.

So what are examples of the relevant search phrases you targeting for the site?

Examples:
"Geek clocks", "binary clock", "LED binary clock", "binary clocks online", "binary clock sales", "binary clock store", "binary clock shop", etc.

How successful has your strategy been?

29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

raindog:

How successful has your strategy been? In many cases too sucessful.

I've learnt the hard way it is unproductive to generate numbers of web hits far in excess of what can be reliably processed.
Whilst I dont argue to the geek gear strategies I'd caution people to seek advice specific to the products they want to sell. The solutions that work for tee-shirts wont apply to custom electronics with finite supply or other items.
Specific targeting of keywords is a must. Its not a question of number of hits its how well you target potential customers.
The other crucial factor is how well your site adapts and stays fresh and up to date to maintain return business and the all important bookmarks.

One site I've been involved with was for a charity that has high profile patronage by sports personalities. The charity had been advised to use sponsored google links which had them top line of almost every search. On analysis most of their bandwith was being generated by sports fans who left as soon as the pages loaded.
A revision of keywords and site information has reduced bandwidth, increased the sites profile with its real targets and reduced the site operating costs.
This wasn't the fault of Google Adds it was just bad advise, those same adds if applied to an in demand product would definitely get results.
The geek gear experience will be interesting to watch, and seeing the feedback is helpful, but the results will be far from a universal model for online sales.





29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

J Webster:

Again we agree Raindog. I hope we are still in accord after this posting. Good advice, research and planning are the keys for a successful shopping site.

If people think they can simply slap up a shopping site and make a fortune they will join the countless thousands who have already been sorely disappointed.

A short list of essential planning and implementation requirements are:

  • Research to identify relevant search words to target Research into your online competition Write SE-friendly web page copy to target your words
  • Ensure your site provides good SE robot access Select a shopping cart program that supports SE enhancement
  • Utilise its SE enhancement features when publishing your pages Continuously add relevant content Implement a links building strategy

These are all essential and interdependent activities. Omit any one of them and your site is likely to fail.

It seems few shopping cart owners bother with this discipline and almost any product search will generate a list of sponsored link shopping cart advertisers, most of whom can attract traffic no other way.

Getting good advice can be a problem as there are so many scammers and misinformed “experts” out there. The Aust. Government recovered I believe around $80,000 in a recent court case for investors in a USA company’s shopping cart scam.

Incidentally, I received a mailed invitation last week for a similar scheme from another company.A bit of online research showed that it appears to have the same management as the company that was the subject of our government’s recent court action. It looks like we are in for a repeat dose.

Target search word/phrase research is crucial. Ideally you want a page from your site to rank in the top 10 search results to as wide a range of relevant search phrases as possible.

Do you know for example, which is used most frequently, “tee shirt”, “t shirt”, “tee-shirt” or “t-shirt”? All will produce different SE results. Then if people use the plural form of these words in their search phrases there are four more variants to consider. You may find the words “shop(s), store(s) and shopping occur in the phrases you want to target and this little example has already blown out to 40 possible phrases.

It does not stop here. It is likely that many searchers will be using words like “men(s)”, “women(s)” or “children(s)” in their search phrase, others may include a brand name or words to describe its content – “funny”, “political” or “cartoon”.

If all the words used in a search phrase do not occur on one of your pages (or in the links text to it), your shopping cart page will not even qualify for the search results list.

A common failure with many shopping carts is lack of relevant information. Many owners seem focused on publishing lots of products on their sites with as little effort as possible.

If the best you have to offer the SEs is a product page with a product name, colour, price, size and picture, your site is probably SE dead.

Selecting a SE-friendly shopping cart program is another essential. There are lots of cheap ones around and the old saying, “pay peanuts, get monkeys” probably applies to most.

A shopping cart is a form of content management system. You may like to read what a couple of SEO experts have to say about them:

Searchnewz.com

Quote: "One of the fastest ways to minimise your chances of web business success is to use a Content Management System (CMS)."

Dynamic Pages and Search Engine Rankings

Searchengineposition.com

Quote: "While a CMS can be an invaluable tool to those who need to manage a large amount of data, many Content Management Systems can cause problems with search engine positioning." There are shopping cart programs available that can avoid the problems discussed in these articles but they are unlikely to be found amongst the cheap and do-it-yourself offerings. Getting qualified visitors to a shopping cart site is a relatively easy task if you get all the above right, and more.



29 February 2008, 8:39 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Laurel Papworth:

This site is not so bad.
But you may want to consider that perhaps the real issue is not google search but social search. While I like the tagging widgets, the lack of even, say, a partial RSS feed, completely chokes off the true power of the 'net - Geeks passing on to other Geeks. Look at Techmeme and TechCrunch for examples of how Web 2.0 geeks work together. As well as RSS, see how they link the top bloggers in geekdom? Why not establish yourself as a premier blog like those ones? Also I saw no reference to trackbacks and pings - but it's too early in the morning for me to read this properly, so if it's there, forgive me. :)
(Oh and please accept this in the spirit it was intended - to be helpful)

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC administrator:

Coming soon! :-)

29 February 2008, 8:40 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user

April APC on sale now!

Tags