HOW TO: modify Vista's Aero Glass interface

James Bannan15 August 2006, 4:41 AM

Do the animations in Windows Vista make you feel half-drunk or motion sick? Do the overcluttered Explorer windows confuse the hell out of you when you're hunting for a file in a hurry? Here's how to strip back Vista to rid it of the eyecandy.


Without a doubt, Vista's #1 talked-about feature is its "Aero Glass" interface: those semi-translucent windows that swoop and swoosh across the screen with giddying frequency.

It is a very different interface when compared to previous versions of Windows, and it tends to have a polarising impact on people who've used it.

Personally, I believe that Vista’s Aero Glass theme looks great, but there’s no way I’m living with it as is.

At the risk of being drowned in hate mail yet again, I’ll venture forth the opinion that this is one the major benefits of Windows over any other operating system out there - it’s incredibly customisable.

Gnome, KDE and OSX are all great interfaces and I’m not knocking them, but they have all the flexibility of America’s foreign policy. They’re good because they have to be - you’re pretty much stuck with them as they appear.

Windows, on the other hand, doesn’t have to look amazing out of the box - there are thousands of ways to make your computer look like either something out of an Anne Rice novel or like a Japanese manga artist’s bubblegum-and-LSD-fuelled mind haze. Or a happy combination of both.

Modifying Aero Glass

Right-click on the Vista desktop and select Personalize. This takes you to the Personalization panel, also accessible through Control Panel, Appearance and Personalization.

personalise01_small.png

Click on Window Color and Appearance and you get a window new to Vista which gives you some basic control over the Glass effects. If you don’t like transparency (and to be honest it’s a little disconcerting…makes you feel half-drunk after a while), then either dial the transparency level up until the borders are almost opaque or disable it completely.

Disabling transparency gives the system a performance boost as well - always useful. For some customised colour, expand the “Show color mixer” dialogue and go crazy.

personalise02_small.png

Select “Open classic appearance properties for more color options”, and you get the old Appearance Settings options - the same from the Appearance tab under Display Properties in Windows XP.

There are all the old colour schemes available, so if you want to strip the visual impact right back, choose Windows Standard (or Classic) and revel in that old Windows 2000 look. Even though it really does look dreadful…

personalise04_small.png

personalise06_small.png

Go into Advanced and customise any aspect of the windows - fonts, border thickness and colour and so on. These features are completely unchanged from any other version of Windows, but being able to modify the Aero Glass effects keeps them relevant.

personalise05_small.png

Windows Explorer

With its focus on metadata, tags and content, the Explorer experience in Vista takes some getting used to. In my last post, Vista: Ultimate Confusing Mess Edition, I talked about how Windows users really couldn’t care less about metadata in general. They’re certainly not interested in having to add it all manually.

That’s one thing which I think Microsoft might have underestimated. The way in which we work with files and folders is the same way we’ve been doing it since Windows 95. That’s eleven years of inertia to overcome. Of course Microsoft has to start making changes somewhere, but I don’t think Vista is the OS to revolutionise the way we do things.

So, any self-respecting Vista user is probably going to jump straight into the Control Panel, switch on Classic View, and click into Folder Options. Want that metadata out of your life? Select “Use Windows classic folders” and that annoying footer on each folder view is history. Click into View and you’ve got a swathe of options to choose from including my personal favourite - “Always show menus”.

folders02_small.png

folders03_small.png

And once you’ve got the classic folders enabled, you can expand the folder pane view so that you actually know where you are now, change the view from Medium Icons to Details, then jump back into Folder Options and apply those changes across the board. And you’re left with a Windows Explorer you can actually work with.

folders01_small.png

It’s All Good

To be honest, I don’t know a single Windows user who, given the choice, has left their visual settings at factory default. This isn’t because the factory defaults are terrible, but because we all love to personalise, to brand something as our own. It gives a sense of ownership…it’s almost territorial in that respect (and changing your wallpaper and theme is more socially acceptable than urinating on your computer).

Don’t get hung up about Aero. If you don’t like it just scrap it. And if you think Windows Explorer is confusing and frustrating, turn it back to the way it was. Nothing’s stopping you. Personally, I prefer to think of the default Vista interface as a demonstration of what the OS can achieve, rather than a love-it-or-hate-it product. I neither love it nor hate it, but I applaud the efforts which have gone into making it. And then I’ll make it do what I want it to…

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Simon:

What are the reasons that one would upgrade from Xp to Vista other than Vista looks good. Are the benefits worth the money, ram and hard-drive space?

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Orion13622:

The real truth is that although Vista is faster out of the box, and it has some nice eye-candy, it's not the OS that XP is. Perfect example, you only need to place one key in your registry to make it run as fast if not faster than Vista on your current machine. Case and point made there, the visual graphics are for children. If you use your PC for work, do you really need the distraction of Vista's eye candy? No. Do you constantly need to be bothered by Vista's User Protection System asking you if you want to install a piece of software you just placed in the CD drive? No. If I didn't want to install it, I would have never placed it in the drive in the first place.

Seems a lot of idiot proof code went into Vista, only to hinder those of us who know how to use our PCs on a daily basis. Shame on Microsoft for that one. Besides, being an OEM System Builder Member with Microsoft, I do my best to steer people away from Vista until they iron out all the bugs. The 64 bit versions of Vista and XP are even worse...

Just food for thought. Oh, and for the Linux gurus, yes KDE, GNOME, and others are customizable, but if you REALLY use Linux (Web server, ect.) Most people who use it only deal with the command line...they don't waste time with a GUI because it slows everything down...

29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ben:

You said it bro,
its not about them not doing a good job, its about personal taste and thats it.
thats the only reason anyone would ever consider forking out for stardock producta such as windows blinds.
it just makes it so much more fun.

P.S. I really like the windows vista look and i am currently emulating it using a windows blinds skin.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

George:

I'm not sure Windows is more flexible than Linux DEs. In my experience, a Linux system is a lot more flexible.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

hoba:

Please buy a mac or find a mac with macos running on it.

Use it for a few hours and then realise that this Aero stuff is state-of-the-art 2-4 years ago!

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

James Bannan:

Yeah, I did get a mac actually (well, borrowed one anyway). OSX is lovely. I'm not denying it. Actually I openly stated it in the article. But what if I want to change it? Want something completely different to match my mood? Tough luck on me, huh? Nah sorry....state of the art has nothing to do with it. An OS which lets you put your personal stamp on it as FAR FAR much more going for it.

And did you know that Windows 98 has a bigger market share than OSX? Food for thought...

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin:

What ancient version of Gnome is less customizable than that??

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

andy:

You are STUPID.

Are you trying to say that KDE and GNOME cannot be customized in appearance?

Because this is a load of bollocks. KDE and GNOME are more customizable than Windows in every respect, this includes appearance.

Why did you even bother to write this pointless article in the first place?

You clearly have far too much spare time on your hands. And in reponse to any "Why did [I] waste the time to write this comment" comments such and such...

Such is life that I am a student who is on summer holiday and your article made me even more bored.

Yet I know more about the various software thats out there than you. Because you just made some major mistakes about KDE and GNOME. Perhaps you should stick to spreadsheets.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

James Bannan:

I'm not saying that Gnome and KDE aren't customisable. I know they are. Very much so, seeing how I use Gnome on a daily basis. But they are NOT as customisable as the Windows UI. Not by a long shot, and anyone who thinks otherwise is either a programmer and thus in a different league to all those enthusiast UI tweakers out there, or simply deluded.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Smarterthanyouforsure:

You got it ALL wrong. You mean Windows, all versions including Vista, is not by a long shot 1/4 as customisable as Gnome or KDE. Were you smoking Bill Gate's pole when you wrote this, or what? And what programmer is going to play with the way the OS looks, anyways?? I guess I must be "deluded", according to you, since I'm able to pull way more customization out of just about any OS than out of Windows Vista.

You need to go back to school, boy.

29 February 2008, 8:33 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

john:

Is Vi$ta going to be Micro$oft's version of the Leyland P76 ???

Linux is much better for security tho my next computer will probably be an apple.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Alan:

Forget about the eye candy, is this OS any good? Security is a fail, most of my hardware will not run, current model printer(Epson R230)no driver, soundblaster live 5.1 no driver, cannon scanner 5000f no driver. This thing is later that the Titinic and it still has major failings?

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

halcon:

The writer of this article has been paid for Micro$oft to praise this flash-trash of Window$ Vi$ta.
Only the fools can rush to buy a big cardbox with nothing else than a disc inside.
Microsoft is crying foul of "piracy" when they are pirates with license to rob from the wallets of everyone in dictating their ruthless conditions.
A better pricing and licensing structure to benefit everyone and not a few would be welcome.
I wish the open source community could do a better approach by matching all the features and easy of use of Windows, in doing so everyone will have a better alternative.
I know Microsoft will tremble to that possibility, they cannot conquer the world for too long.
If there is another player with better features than Microsoft, they can go deep to hell for sure!

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

david:

More to the point how long does it take to boot up and how resource hungry is it apart from hard drive space??? Will it be another example of 'bloatware'??

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

James Bannan:

I WISH I was paid by Microsoft...then I could buy the Audi I've always wanted... :-)

Heh heh.

But seriously, I don't think Vista is bloatware at all. It boots faster than XP on equivalent hardware, handles well and shuts down beautifully. Under the hood, it has a LOT to recommend it.

It's actually worthwhile doing some of the things I outlined in the article - strip back the visual effects and you get a better feel for what Vista can offer. The inbuilt apps are genuinely good, and the underlying security and stability is far, far ahead of XP.

Of course, after four years of XP, you'd hope that Vista was at least that advanced...

Yes there are driver issues so far. But to be fair, that's not exactly Microsoft's fault. It's quite surprising that major hardware vendors like Epson, Canon and Creative are behind the game when it comes to developing (or releasing) beta drivers, when others like ATI, NVIDIA, Intel and Realtek are happily keeping pace. Don't think we can really blame MS for that.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mical Ward:

GNOME is highly customizable. As a starting point, most systems have about 8 very attractive and useable yet distinct themes. After that, have a look at all the themes at http://art.gnome.org/themes. You can customize the start screen, the window borders, the buttons and bars, the fonts, and the icons.

To make this level of customization on Windows, you either need programming skills or third-party software such as WindowBlinds or UXTheme.

I also disagree that the default Windows user interface is satisfactory. The standard Windows XP theme is too big and bright. It was designed to stand out so that users felt they were getting their money's worth when upgrading from 9x or 2000. It becomes too intrusive and annoying when using it for long periods, as you've mentioned about the new Aero theme for Vista.

I'd suggest either spending the time to look at Linux desktops like GNOME properly, or sticking to what you know best.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

h:

If Microsoft want to win customers including myself, they should:
Lower the price of their complete software range.
$25 for Windows XP or Vista would be a very reasonable price, if there is a family with up to 5 computers then a license up to that amount of computers with the use of a single media (CD or DVD)for the price of $50 would be appreciated.
just consider this, Microsoft will make a lot of money because the price for their products would be attractive and affordable.
With a low price there is no need to worry about organized criminals because they will not be able to pirate the software and sell at such lower price.
Microsoft could even incentivate people into buying theses products creating a loyalty scheme, with very good results.
but if they are too arrogant to recognise the needs of their user base, then walk out with tour wallet and look elsewhere, you will get a better alternative (though not perfect yet)with the open source movement.
Also the writer of this article seems to be a puppet at the hands of Microsoft, sure you want to dream buying a car doesn't He? How about a Dell notebook computer? I wish I could have one but I can't, so I have to be content of viewing as many models across Magazines, Newsapers and Television; after all dreaming costs nothing!

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Panda:

Why would you want to install Vista on a old crappy computer! sounds pointless.

29 February 2008, 8:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Stephen:

Forget Blu-Ray vs. HD-DVD.
We all know that from the complaints shown here, that the real battle is Windows vs. The Rest.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

jake (User):

i love aero and flip 3d in vista
but u know how u maximize a windows and it isant see through any more
i had a program on my computer i think it was called vistaglas or glazz
and it tweaks areo so when u maximize the windows its still see through works great with my tweaked dreame sceen on home preium

14 April 2008, 2:49 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

shattered_neon (New user):

hi, can anyone help me, when changing the colour scheme on my laptop I am unable to get to the basic vista auro window, at the point where this window is supposed to load the classic appearence properties window loads instead. The more basic auro window had loaded before but not for sometime, i was wandering if ther is anyway i can turn it back on. I am refering to the window with the coloured tiles on it where you can adjust transparacy etc.

04 June 2008, 12:52 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user

April APC on sale now!

Tags