iiNet out of Rudd/Conroy net filtering trial

Staff Writers23 March 2009, 12:36 PM

iiNet has announced that it has pulled out of the government's controversial internet filtering pilot.


iiNet, Australia’s third largest Internet Service Provider, has advised the Federal Government that it is withdrawing from the proposed internet filtering trial.

iiNet’s Managing Director, Michael Malone, says they only agreed to participate in the trial to demonstrate that the policy was fundamentally flawed, a waste of taxpayers’ money and would not work.

Mr Malone said after drawn-out negotiations with the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (DBCDE), it was clear that an agreement could not be reached.

He cites constant changes in the policy, confused explanations of the purpose of the trial and recent revelations regarding the “blacklist” as clear indications that the trial is unnecessary.

“We are not able to reconcile participation in the trial with our corporate social responsibility, our customer service objectives and our public position on censorship,” says Mr. Malone.

“It became increasingly clear that the trial was not simply about restricting child pornography or other such illegal material, but a much wider range of issues including what the Government simply describes as “unwanted material” without an explanation of what that includes.

“Everyone is repulsed by, and opposed to, child pornography but this trial and policy is not the solution or even about that.

“In reality, the vast majority of online child pornography activity does not appear on public websites but is distributed over peer-to-peer networks which are not and cannot be captured by this trial or policy.”

Mr Malone said the Government should re-think its approach and urgently needs to make clear what its intentions are in respect of internet censorship, this lack of communication from government and bureaucracy is rightly seen as underhand and unsavory and is now attracting international dismay as well as Australian disgust.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

The Big Baboo (User):

Ahaaaaa I knew they'd fall over their big-foot and stub it badly.I wonder who else is still in this half-assed scheme of our present beloved Govt. and how long we will have to put up with it.I notice awhile ago they had to get rid of the "Alco-pops" tax and I wonder how long before this idea goes bye-bye.

23 March 2009, 12:54 PM (12 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

constant changes in the policy, confused explanations of the purpose of the trial and recent revelations regarding the “blacklist” as clear indications that the trial is unnecessary.

Just add long winded rhetoric filled speeches with no clear direction or purpose and no relation to the subject at hand and you pretty much have covered Rudd policy and performance to date chronicled in full.

23 March 2009, 1:23 PM (12 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

shrike (User):

The thought that this malicious affront to freedom could ever go ahead makes me feel physically sick, congratulations to iiNet for standing up to the morons behind this policy.

23 March 2009, 6:23 PM (12 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

In addition to Raindog's comment, I'll add that Conroy (and/or staff) simply doesn't answer questions about the project...
Sure they are awkward questions over their selection of ISPs and their flawed trial methods, but as a citizen of Australia, I should be responded to with answers. And I even gave the useless guy my postal address as requested.

23 March 2009, 6:38 PM (12 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

 x  (User):

Wow!
I expected a slow rise in the 'unwated material' blocks over time, using cp etc, as a justification for the initial introduction.
Here they are guns blazing, drawing attention to the potential missuse of their filter.
There will always be a simple solution to bypass their filter. I expect it is currently as simple as using an overseas proxy.
This is a massive waste of time, anyone interested in nafarious activity will find a way to meet their needs, the filter only slow down our internet. it will not put a dent in the crimes.

25 March 2009, 4:04 PM (11 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags