In-depth: inside Windows XP SP3

James Bannan13 August 2007, 10:50 PM

Boy those leaks just keep on coming - first Vista SP1 and now XP SP3. Check out our in-depth assessment of the next major update for Windows XP.


Help more people find out about this story! Digg it!

There have been about as many rumours surrounding Windows XP Service Pack 3 as there have about Vista Service Pack 1. Well, it seems that nothing stays secret for very long, and while Microsoft has confirmed that XP SP3 is certainly in the pipeline, there hasn’t been very much in the way of detailed information.

However, hot on the heels of our in-depth examination of the private beta of Vista SP1, our reliable developer source came through with the goods once again, and we have the private beta of Windows XP SP3 in our hot little hands.

Unlike Vista SP1 which was a full DVD ISO with the service pack integrated, XP SP3 is a single 330MB download – basically the same format as SP1 and SP2. This particular build’s current KB number a KB936929 (windowsxp-kb936929-sp3-x86-enu), and the full version build is 5.1.2600.3180.

Like all Windows XP service packs and updates, you can extract the contents of the SP3 executable with WinRAR and slipstream it into an existing Windows XP distribution point (like a network share or bootable CD). To maximise the difference comparison, I tested the installation side-by-side on two Windows XP SP2 machines which have all system drivers installed, but no post-SP2 updates applied. For comparison, Windows XP SP2 has a version number of 5.1 (Build 2600.xpsp_sp2.rtm.040803-2158 : Service Pack 2) and an NTOSKRNL.EXE version of 5.1.2600.2180.

XPSP2 - WINVERXPSP2 - WINVER

XPSP2 - NTOSKRNLXPSP2 - NTOSKRNL

Before installing, I had a browse through the extracted files. There were a couple of HTML readmes, which funnily enough were still those used from SP2. Presumably they will be changed before the pack goes out to public beta.

The installation runs like all previous XP service packs – unpacking the files, reminding to create a backup and then rolling through the installation as normal – no real surprises there. Like SP2, it also takes a long time to install. After install the machine needs to be restarted.

XPSP3 - InstallationXPSP3 - Installation

XPSP3 - Installation WizardXPSP3 - Installation Wizard

If you don’t have Automatic Updates configured (like I didn’t on the test systems) you’ll be prompted again to set it up.

What’s new?

Visually, there’s not much noticeably different about the SP3 desktop. Internet Explorer doesn’t get upgraded to version 7, which is probably a sensible move as many businesses still need the flexibility to choose when -- or if -- to update.

XPSP3 - InstalledXPSP3 - Installed

The version number is now 5.1 (Build 2600.xpsp.070718-2058 : Service Pack 3, v.3180), and the NTOSKRNL.EXE version is now 5.1.2600.3180.

XPSP3 - System PropertiesXPSP3 - System Properties

XPSP3 - WINVERXPSP3 - WINVER

XPSP3 - NTOSKRNLXPSP3 - NTOSKRNL

There’s not much within the updated machine to indicate what’s changed. However, looking at the extracted files (in particular the application EXEs and application extension DLLs, we can get a better picture at what’s been impacted by the service pack:

  • Auto Check Utility
  • Auto File System Conversion Utility
  • Boot Loader
  • Fax XP SP1 Patch
  • Microsoft .NET Assembly Registration Utility
  • Microsoft .NET Framework
  • Microsoft .NET Framework CAS Policy Manager
  • Microsoft .NET Framework IL assembler
  • Microsoft .NET Services Installation Utility
  • Microsoft Common Language Runtime native compiler
  • Microsoft FrontPage CGI Server Administrator
  • Microsoft FrontPage Hit Counter
  • Microsoft FrontPage Server Administration Snapin
  • Microsoft FrontPage Server Administrator
  • Microsoft FrontPage Server Administrator Client
  • Microsoft FrontPage Server Extensions
  • Microsoft FrontPage Server Extensions
  • Microsoft FrontPage TCP/IP Tester
  • Microsoft IE Execute shell
  • Microsoft JScript .NET Compiler
  • Microsoft Telnet Client
  • Peer-to-Peer Custom Setup
  • Registry Editor
  • SetRegNI Application
  • Stub loader for WINNT32 setup program (WINNT.EXE & WINNT32.EXE)
  • Tablet PC Calibration
  • ToGac Application
  • Update RunOnce Service
  • UpdateUtil Appliation
  • Visual Basic .NET Command Line Compiler
  • Visual C# Command Line Compiler
  • Windows Messenger
  • Windows Service Pack Auto-Recovery Tool
  • Windows Service Pack Uninstall
  • Windows XP SP installer downgrade tasks
  • Windows XP SP installer tasks

After the fireworks that accompanied XP SP2, SP3 is almost anticlimatic. However, the rumour mill didn’t anticipate any new features, rather a raft of security updates and bug fixes. There have been plenty of of post-SP2 patches for Windows XP, but at this stage it’s difficult to ascertain which ones have been incorporated into SP3 or superseded by the service pack itself, which seems to be just a solid, genuine OS update, with updates applied across core applications and nothing to be particularly worried about.

There’s no confirmed release date for SP3 yet, but rumours place it sometime in the first half of 2008.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

tin:

Not terribly exciting... Although I'm more likely to use it now that I know it doesn't have IE7.

I'm interested to know if they are including KB888111 fix in this. I hate that stupid thing.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Brendan:

This is probably one of the main reasons I left XP to use another OS, and no that doesn't neccesarily mean GNU/Linux.

I just had enough of the lack of security and the instability of the OS. They then announced Vista would be released before SP3. I then hear that they may never release SP3 as they are phasing out XP altogether infavour of the underwhelming Vista.

I'm quite happy using my assortment of Unix OS's, for example Solaris, BSD and Linux. Maybe if MS was faster to release a service pack I would have stayed a tad longer, but now they lose.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous12:

If it's security you want - go with Vista. According to the latest studies, it's the most secure OS out there - provided you keep certain features turned on.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Robbie Mosaic:

XP is already secure enough if fully patched. Even Windows 2000 is. Most security flaws lie in client programs like IE, server programs like Shared Folders and legacy applications like winhlp32, and if these are patched, the system would be secure. The most important thing to remember is to keep the firewall on and don't download strange things. In addition, don't log in as the Administrator.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

John:

That's what they said about Windows XP Pro, too... and I don't think I need to show how many "malicious code that allowed an attacker to take over your machine" articles there are on the Q and KB lists.

Actually, I seem to remember quite a few after Vista was recently out... but bleh...

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kaitain09:

Are you serious?! If security is a topic then by it's own merits is an issue. MS and security never went hand-in-hand. Vista won't change that. Just another dog chasing it's tail. The same can be said of MS users as well. If anyone gets insulted then just too bad. Too bad you do not understand. Go back and fork some more $ for some anti-whatever crap.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Callum:

I have to say.. this is a needless update,
I think its just a name so businesses will have a false sense of security.
I much like the Unofficial version of SP3 (currently circling the warez networks), With every single hotfix, auto install programs (freeware ones) and visual upgrades to make it look more like vista.

When 1 or 2 people do a better job than Microsoft, this really disheartens me..

Get your act together guys!?

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Sean:

Where exactly can I get the unofficial SP3? Would it be possible for you to please let me know? An example of where I can get it?

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

MadEd:

Hi Sean,
Take a look on the forums of www.thehotfix.net


29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Stephen:

They may not have included IE7 but they could have fixed windows firewall ie so it stops unwanted outbound traffic like they did for vista but then I suppose that would be to much to ask for.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tony Brown:

Hi Stephen Yep I was never very happy with the Windows Firewall and one day I found this site and it's fixed all the problems and the good thing is that it's free for lifetime use.Of course you have to up-date now and then but
that's a small bother :):)
www.personalfirewall.comodo.com

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

froddy (New user):

hi newbe here i tried comodo on a new installed hard drive after a fresh xp pro install with sp2 short time later pc acting up so i slaved h.drive to another pc ran a scan and found a trogan and two virus? back to zone alarm and avg

27 April 2008, 4:00 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

drewhiggins:

Good job. This looks interesting, thanks for it.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Michael:

Does anyone know if XP SP3 fixes XP's volsnap.sys to not delete Vista's restore points and shadow copies when dual-booting?

Thanks.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymuos:

What about Windows Media Player? Does XPSP3 include WMP 11?

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

sp3 user:

XPSP3 doesn't include WMP 11.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Daniel Reeders:

Just a quick comment on the language in this article.

When you're making a word that means 'pertaining to something ending in x', where 'something' is a word like syntax or climax, you need to remember 'c before tic'. Syntactic, climactic, anti-climactic.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mike Johnson:

That would be a deal breaker for me.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Michael G.:

WGA would be a deal breaker? Then stop pirating software.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

john:

Are there any graphic enhancement in SP3 beta?

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kaitain09:

Yes, certainly. It will bog down your GPU to Vista levels.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

john:

WHICH DX version does SP3 use?

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Feelthe pain:

The problem with most software which checks for legality is that they take the heavy handed attitude of "killing" the software after a minor corruption is found.
Piracy is created when an article which is seen as overpriced, which is essential, is used by people who cant afford to buy it. Microsoft should drop their prices for their technology, or adopt open source. They will never do this as their technology, like your phone line is able to be used to spy on you by big brother.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Xu:

Just accidently changing the system date, can trigger a WGA "you are using pirate SW" popups. I find this unacceptable and it tarnishes your reputation with you clients.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Enlightened:

That's quite the accusation. Try being less ignorant.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Michael B.:

That is one ignorant, pudden-headed comment... WGA is broke, and it seems as if your brain is, too.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Not Pudding-Head (New user):

I believe you meant "puddin'-headed" and "brain is, to (one 'o'); pudding-head.

03 May 2008, 6:41 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags