Intel to sell "unlocking" cards to add features to your CPU

Dan Warne
20 September 2010, 2:18 PM


Intel has started selling chips with features purposefully disabled so you can pay $50 and unlock them later if you want them.


Overclockers have been unlocking features on chips for years -- but these are usually disabled by the chipmaker due to the chip not passing full quality tests. Overclockers typically run the gauntlet of system stability because they're pushing their chip to performance levels that the chipmaker won't guarantee.

However, according to Hardware.info, which spotted an upgrade card in the United States, Intel is now selling upgrades for certain CPUs. You buy the card (pictured below) in the store which has an iTunes voucher-like PIN number on it, go to Intel's website and download the software (for Win 7 only), run it on your machine, and hey presto, your CPU has extra capabilities -- in this case, some more L3 cache and the ability to do hyperthreading.

The move will be controversial because many people will be surprised to know that Intel has sold them a chip that has had aspects of it deliberately disabled so they can be sold for profit later.

However, other big tech companies have been doing the same thing for years. Microsoft has been selling cheaper versions of Windows with features deliberately disabled, in the hope that you'll want to upgrade to them later when you need them.

What is interesting about Intel's new strategy is that the chipmaker is starting to treat chips as software, rather than hardware.

Depending on how far Intel goes with the scheme, it might allow notebook makers to produce fewer physical models of notebook, and then simply tailor the system with various versions of the Intel upgrade voucher.

Also curious is the fact that although Intel has a live website about the scheme, it is clearly unfinished and not designed for public consumption yet.

The Intel website also provides the following graph as an example of the speed boosts you could expect to see. What's interesting here is that the "before" and "after" stats show two different processor numbers -- so, clearly, Intel's software converts your processor from one model to another internally.

Another interesting point is the question in the FAQ: "How do I return my upgrade?". The answer is: "For specific return policies, please contact the retailer where you purchased your upgradable system."

It's hard to imagine how you could return a processor upgrade to a retailer -- presumably, retailers would only accept an 'unscratched' card. But in the scenario that an upgrade didn't provide the promised performance, we wonder what would happen.

It's not clear yet whether the upgrade vouchers will be sold in Australia -- we've put in an enquiry with Intel Australia and are waiting to hear back.

UPDATE: Intel Australia spokesman Paul McKeon replied that it's a pilot program involving a limited number of customers in the United States, Canada, the Netherlands, and Spain. It's also limited to a specific processor, the Pentium(r) G6951---which is only available via participating resellers.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

kaf (User):

Great. So now, just like many people finding cracks for DRM games to copy/play without disk, we are now going to download "cracks" for our cpu's to make them faster.
Besides the line "crack my cpu" sounding like cringe-worthy hollywood psuedo-tech speak this is really dishonest and I'm wondering how their lawyers are going to combat the hacker community when we do see cpu cracks online.


20 September 2010, 2:40 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

$teeve Pink (New user):


Apple have been crippling their products from day 1 in order to extract

maximum dollars from the fanboys.

It's disappointing that Intel feel that they should also reduce the

consumer experience for their products.

Shame Intel, shame.

20 September 2010, 5:06 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

I guess we'll be pushing AMD stuff more now... At least until they announce a similarly retarded scheme.

And I agree with kaf - it's only going to be a matter of time before people start "cracking" these CPUs.

20 September 2010, 6:49 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

Talk about exploiting the predictably irrational. What's next?
NIC's that operate at 1Gbps only when transferring intel sponsored content?
GPU's that share CPU load only when you collect all 10 'intel Classic Moments cards' sold with select 'boosted 802.11n' intel wi-fi recharge cards? *Wireless-n speeds not guaranteed.

Chasing the 'Long Tail' in a highly commoditised market I can see CPU's given away for free and you subscribe to the performance tier you want, $5/month gives you 1 core, 512kB cache, no HT, no boost.
Or go on pre-paid with recharge cards starting at $20 for bunch of 'operands' suited to light use like 100 web sites + 100 emails + unlimited MeeGo (Windows uses up operands).

20 September 2010, 7:40 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

That's so funny... So funny it'll probably bloody come true now. And you can blame yourself for suggesting it! ;-)

20 September 2010, 8:43 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

djsflynn (APC staff):

Dear God, Agami, don't give the marketing folk any ideas! Before you know it they'll not only adopt your plan but we'll see a slew of processors with Microsoft-like naming: Core i3 Starter, Core i3 Home Basic, Core i3 Home Premium, Core i3 Professional, Core i3 Enterprise, Core i3 Ultimate etc etc...

20 September 2010, 9:06 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

reginald (Frequent poster):

Hey intel, i am going to start using AMD they are already cheaper than your latest offering and all of your offerings in fact and i only have to pay them once. Talk about corporate greed.

21 September 2010, 2:38 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

azariah007 (New user):

Yo Dude, I work at a computer store that seriously pushes the AMD brand and I'm gonna tell you Intel looks stupid once you start comparing them side-by-side dollar-for-performance. Like, for instance, I've just been researching a seriously big gaming rig using the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T and get this I can get a $400(AU) graphics card and a RAID 0+1 set up with 4x500GB HD's for around the $1,300. :D SWEET
(that's finding the cheapest going price's of course)

Try doing that with an Intel based system FFFFOOOOMMMM there goes 4 grand. This is just gonna make the discerning PC user less likely to use Intel CPU's and the less discerning PC users more gullible. It's like the "extended warranty" schemes, true some companies have made a real good deal out of it to the benefit of there customers, but most have made it a money trap for there benefit.

On the other hand if this were available for older CPU's like Core 2 Duos, Celerons, heck even P4's I'd consider getting it but honestly don't corrupt the perfectly functional CPU classification system we already have.

If Intel had brains they wouldn't be touting this scheme. Especially after having lost a $1.3-Billion court case to AMD. If there not careful AMD's one-two punch return could be a one-two-knockout punch.

04 October 2010, 2:52 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Halcon (User):

I always liked Intel for its processors, even though these are really expensive than the opposition AMD.
Thanks to AMD, the fierce battle for the desktop computing has got more interesting and the price was more cheaper every time.
If Intel is going to use the greedy tactics of the most evil software company Microsoft, then it will loss me as a customer as well, I don't want to be ripped off for hidden features that come standard using several motherboards from the Gigabyte product Line and other brands.
This will be the most dishonest marketing idea, people should gather as one and launch a class action against Intel as this behaviour cant be tolerated any longer.

24 September 2010, 4:43 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

reginald (Frequent poster):

All this time i thought apple was the greedy company, Apple sells outdated equipment at premium prices using child labor in Taiwan and when i last looked apple was a bigger company than microsoft and have their system tied up far more than microsoft. Microsoft is no longer the big bogey man, its all thanks to mr lawsuit Jobbs.Intel are only beginners at being greedy compared to this man. Class action lawsuits are in effect a slap on the wrists for these companies who at any one time have vat least half a dozen law suit cases going.

26 September 2010, 11:18 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Halcon (User):

Sure, Apple is another evil company that is brainwashing uninformed people to buy its useless technology.
It would be nice if at least this company made a more honest approach when selling its line of products, but you see, there are some greedy companies that try to maximise their revenue while spending big in misleading advertisements.
I would like to see a ranking of the most evil companies in computing published, why the reason of such listing with the explanation of technological sins of these greedy corporations.
I would list them like this:
1.- Microsoft Corp.
2.- Adobe systems
3.- Autodesk
4.- Apple
5.- Symantec
As you see the list would go on but the real problem is that these companies make severe restrictions to the use of its products, the pricing is too expensive, a lot of variants form a single product instead of a full featured product, this is the real abuse that is taking all kind of users to ransom, even governments around the world can't do nothing about it for fear of retaliation.
The law can't protect honest users from the abuse of these corporations, the so called pirates can bypass them easily, to cover its failure they take on simple and defenceless users.
So here we do not see a change in this regard, therefore Intel should not follow the path of these unscrupulous companies or it will end up losing money and the customers it gained during its existence; this will cost very dearly to Intel, so is better to think twice before doing more damage than good.

29 September 2010, 8:08 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kaf (User):

I like how you've included Autodesk in that list. You must be in either engineering or the film industry.
Autodesk have by far the most overpriced and overrated software on the planet.

29 September 2010, 8:38 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

reginald (Frequent poster):

Since when does common law protect the end user, common law is there to protect companies being taken by bigger companies and if you have enough money then you may get protected, i agree heartily with your comments except for the layout of your line up i still maintain that Apple is evil incarnate and Microsoft are a long way behind possibly behind adobe even. The problem with Microsoft is they have copped the referred blame for all the virus and adware. The main villain you left out is Intel, they have just paid out billions in damages to amd for their bad business practices. Intel is one of the worst companies in existence.

29 September 2010, 11:11 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Halcon (User):

There is a discussion topic in the main area please go there and make your contribution with your comments, thanks!

30 September 2010, 5:02 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Eddie (User):

I wonder how you would go if you bought one of these crippled CPU's and ran linux, bought a upgrade and found that you had to run windows on your machine to make the upgrade work?
Not very clever on Intel's part.

04 October 2010, 3:12 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user