Intel shows its iPhone clone

David Flynn
20 September 2007, 1:38 AM


IDF San Francisco |Does Intel want to be the 'i' in iPhone? A very familiar-looking concept 'mobile Internet device' built around the all-in-one Moorestown superchip sure makes things seem that way.


After famously winning Apple's computer business, Intel appears to have its sights set on providing the powerplant for the iPhone and its descendants.

No stretch of the imagination: Intel's latest concept UMPC looks like an elongated iPhone No stretch of the imagination: Intel's latest concept UMPC looks like an elongated iPhone
During this morning's session on mobile Internet devices, Intel's senior veep for ultra mobility Anand Chandrasekher produced a prototype device which looked like a stretch limo version of the iPhone which he spruiked as "mostly all screen, you can read it very nicely; it's very slim, very thin."

Hey Steve, lookie here: of Intel and Apple, UMPCs and iPhones, Anand Chandrasekher says "Hopefully sometime in the future our paths may meet”Hey Steve, lookie here: of Intel and Apple, UMPCs and iPhones, Anand Chandrasekher says "Hopefully sometime in the future our paths may meet”
"I love the iPhone" admitted Chandrasekher. "Apple is a bastion of innovation in their own right, and we are an innovator in our own right. Hopefully sometime in the future our paths may meet".

It's in the cards: Menlow packs everything from the processor to wireless into a mini-motherboardIt's in the cards: Menlow packs everything from the processor to wireless into a mini-motherboard
The slim silver non-iPhone was based on the Moorestown platform, which is the successor to the Menlow UMPC platform (built around the Silverthorne CPU) due in mid-2008. While Chandrasekher played coy with specific details on Moorestown, he said the goal was a 10x reduction in power usage by the time the system shipped in 2009-2010. A slide on Moorestown indicated it would be a ‘system on a chip' which included a 45nm core, graphics and memory controller on a single die - all of which would meet his promise that Moorestown would halve the size and power consumption of mobile Internet devices.

Multicore is also part of the MID's future, says Chandrasekher. "The Internet is not going any less complex" he said, harking back to Intel's mantra of the Internet - and especially social networking, which he claimed is responsible for 25% of traffic on the Internet today - being the driver for ultra-mobile devices.

"The Internet is only getting more complex, more dynamic. And as it moves to a handheld environment it will demand more performance. We're not short on performance today, we are actually delivering what is needed over the next several years. It's a matter of balancing power, cost and performance. When all of those hit the sweet zone, of course we'll offer multi-core."

In addition to heavily spruiking the benefits of Intel's IA silicon architecture over the ARM chips that dominate the mobile market (including the iPhone, which runs a Samsung ARM processor), this morning's presentation noticeably relegated Microsoft to a single token PowerPoint slide whereas key executives from Canonical and Adobe both got a walk-on spot to spin their ultra-mobile wares.

Off the AIR: an ASUS handheld running a beta of Adobe's AIR-based Adobe Media Player, which can run offline or offlineOff the AIR: an ASUS handheld running a beta of Adobe's AIR-based Adobe Media Player, which can run offline or offline
Live demonstrations featured a Compal device unit with WiMAX running Canonical's Ubuntu for Mobile Internet Devices distro, and an Asus UMPC running a beta of Adobe Media Player, which uses Adobe's AIR offline run-time environment to play music and video offered through online ‘channels'.

David Flynn is attending IDF San Francisco 2007 as a guest of Intel Australia


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Anonymous2007:

LOL i want one! it'll fix nicely in my back pocket.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Constable Odo:

Is that an Intel Stretch in your pocket or are you just glad to see me?

I sort of like it, but it doesn't really fit too well in any sort of pocket. Well, maybe a safari jacket.

Jeez, everything looks like an iPhone, nowadays.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Coleman:

it looks nice. maybe a little too big.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Reghart:

Now that thing is cool! I'd love one, I find that the smallish iPhone and Blackberry type devices are a little bit too small for me to have the speaker on my ear and the microphone at my mouth comfortably at the same time. My main reason for having a flip phone.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Sarah:

heyyy, that's the searchcoders desktop running in the bottom picture!

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

justthething84:

itunes is the worst software i've used in a long time. firstly i installed it on a pc. after opening itunes for the 2nd time it said it was installed incorrectly. ah ok. then i purchased 3 tracks after receiving a "503" error for the first one i started getting the shits. THEN after downloading the 3rd song i realised the songs are in some weird m4p format. WTF APPLE.

Not only were they in a shit format they were only 128 bit. This is LESS than CD quality.

After talking to itunes support i have to now go to google and download a converter program to convert them to mp3 - why should i have to do this. itunes should ASK you before you download the songs which format you would like them in.


Itunes is uninstalled and back to limewire for me. Even though apple got my $5.00 im gonna stop using it as of now - its better then spending huge amount of time mucking around with it by getting convertors etc.

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

montex:

A simple click on the Preferences Menu will give you access to which format (including MP3) and bit rate you want to encode your CDs in. It's not Apple's fault that you can't be bothered to set your software to use your preferred settings. Or have you obtained the "Psychic-Plugin" from LaToya Jackson that sets everything for you?

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

justthething84:

So that means I have to burn them before being able to play them in Windows media player.

have you even 'bothered' to find out how long it takes to burn CDs not to mention the hassel? why should someone have to burn a song before being able to play it? what a stupid idea.

mp3 was pretty much the global format when it came to music downloads now we have to muck around with converters to play them. how annoying.

Lets face it Apple is crapple. Anyway 83% of iPod owners do not buy digital music regularly - basically their getting it for free off limewire and torrents, where funnily enough you have a wide selection of formats, including bitrate at your desire :)

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

robby:

lol "less than cd quality" maybe you dont get it. thats why you can fit your music on a computer. cd quality is lossless, exactly as it was made in the studio, and each track is ~30mb.

more importantly its probably a computer problem with your itunes, because i think its great.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

justthething84:

CD quality mp3s are around 192bit. So what your getting is less than that and you dont have an option to download different bit rates/ formats.

if they did that then i would use it.

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

judah:

The width is perfect for viewing but its too big for toting around everywhere. that is one reason i don't take my psp everywhere and one reason i won't use it as a phone. it has a great interface for music but you don't see it everywhere like the ipod because its too big. What they need to do is shrink the width by doing one of the following:

1. making it fold in half similar to the nintendo ds (as long as its still reasonably thin)

2. or use a bendable screen that rolls up. so you have a compact mode that is half the size but then you can stretch it out (pull it apart) like a table and more screen unrolls.

it would also be nice to have it include a micro project.

micro projector:
http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/08/hands-on-with-microvisions-itty-bitty-projector/

bendable roll up screen (12 paragraphs down):
http://www.startribune.com/535/story/1206876.html

nintendo ds:
http://www.nintendo.com/systemsds

sony psp:
http://www.us.playstation.com/PSP/About

29 February 2008, 8:32 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user