Intel snubs Microsoft; offers Linux certification

David Flynn21 July 2008, 4:00 PM

Intel's enthusiasm for open source is gathering speed: now it is endorsing professional Linux certifications, snubbing the old Microsoft certification program.


It’s a sure thing that you can sit for a range of Microsoft certifications at almost any event where two or more ‘Softies are gathered together in Bill’s name. Now Intel is leveraging its own developer muscle by organising Linux certification exams for attendees of the Intel Developer Forum held late August in San Francisco.

Attendees at the annual techfest can land a substantial discount sitting for any of three open-source exams held by the Linux Professional Institute, the world’s premier Linux certification organisation. However, there’s been no word on any similar arrangement for Microsoft certification, despite Redmond once again paying top dollar to be listed among IDF’s Gold Sponsors.

Several tracks of the San Francisco IDF are predictably dedicated to mini-notes, which Intel calls ‘netbooks’, and their desktop equivalents, clumsily tagged as ‘net-tops’, along with mobile Internet devices and the Atom processor family which runs all three types of devices.

Intel has been steadily ramping up its support of Linux for several years. It’s partly a recognition of the open source wave sweeping through governments and commercial organisations alike. More crucial, however, is the nascent market that Intel calls “the next billion computers”, which comprises the classrooms and homes, village centres and even business of third-world countries.

Intel makes its living by selling processors, and with the established worldwide market for desktops and laptops having almost reached saturation, tapping into new markets is a matter of survival. And the operating system that will power those next billion computers is increasingly seen as Linux: an OS that’s free, open, extensible and has lesser hardware requirements than Windows.

The  most noticeable nod towards Linux, which was simultaneously a backhand slap at Microsoft, took place at the Beijing IDF in April 2007, when Intel embraced Linux as the OS of choice for its new class of ‘mobile Internet devices’ as well as an equal partner in a category of larger-screen UMPCs which later morphed into mini-notes. At last year’s San Francisco IDF, a prestigious walk-on spot during the keynote was bestowed upon Ubuntu creator Mark Shuttleworth.

Intel also sponsors the Moblin project for developing a standardised open source platform for MID products, which in turn has fed into two bespoke builds of Ubuntu: Ubuntu Mobile Internet Device Edition for MIDs and Ubuntu Netbook Remix for mini-notes.

And Intel has worked on fine-tuning the Linux kernel for reduced power consumption right across the board from servers to handheld MIDs. Its ‘LessWatts.org’ initiative has already demonstrated power-optimisations, which Intel developers have been working on and feeding back into the open source community, can boost the battery life of a Linux laptop by almost a third and add a full hour to its uptime when away from an AC outlet.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Uh oh... Someone better get the chairs out of Steve's office ;-)

21 July 2008, 5:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

dwr50 (User):

You can either ride the wave or take the taxi. (you have to pay to take the taxi though)

22 July 2008, 1:32 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Your Average Joe (Regular user):

All the Linux world will read this a feel themselves very 'special' !
Here is the REAL Headline ...
Intel did this to make money out of you, not to assuage your egos !

22 July 2008, 11:49 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Of course they're doing it to make money off people. That's what a company is there for. But they are also doing it for their own internal purposes because they are moving that direction (ie away from MS).

22 July 2008, 11:53 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Administrator):

Think about how much money Intel makes from the chips that go into the vast majority of computers sold. Then think about how much money it makes from Linux certifications... it should be obvious that this is not a move that's directly about making money; it's more about fostering a strong competitive ecosystem for computing. THAT benefits Intel financially in the long run, but I don't think you can exactly peg this on them as a direct money-making move!

22 July 2008, 1:29 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Your Average Joe (Regular user):

Intel and MS have one of the largest symbiotic relationship in history, so don't for a second think that this is still not the case.
Intel is marketing itself as the devil's advocate and wanting to be seen as the company that is looking out for FOSS communities ! (while collecting the revenues, of course)

22 July 2008, 1:55 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (Cornerstone member):

Pandering to the Linux geeks so that they can sell a (very) few more Mini-Notes and mobile internet devices in the near future. And I can hear the Linux roar now ! "It's the end of the world for MS .... Again !"

22 July 2008, 10:10 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Uh huh... You keep telling yourself that.
Meanwhile in reality:
Vista - Flaky and unsuitable for a business environment = ~$200 a pop if you buy a lot.
Linux - Stable and suited to just about any task = FREE

So which way should a corporation looking to maximise profits go?

22 July 2008, 10:15 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (Cornerstone member):

Heard all the same chest thumping and MS brow beating 20 years ago about how a free OS was going to rule the world !
I wish the Linux fanboys would just acknowledge that FREE is not necessarily GOOD !!
They use this argument as a crutch for all the poignant criticisms brought up about Linux !

22 July 2008, 11:41 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

It's not about cost this time. It's about MS driving customers like Intel away by releasing products that simply aren't suitable, and removing support for the older ones.
They could go Apple, but they chose to go Open Source because it clearly suites them better that way.

22 July 2008, 11:49 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Eruaran (New user):

20 years ago Linux did not exist. And you seem blissfully unaware of what is happening within the industry here, right now, in 2008. The netbook market is filling up with Linux systems, the mobile industry IS embracing Linux whether you like it or not, names like Acer and Asus are forging ahead with Linux while Dell adds new Ubuntu systems to its range. And Apple recently became the third largest computer maker in the US. What does this mean ? It means the times are changing. You can bluster as much as you like, it wont make any more difference in a changing world than Steve Ballmer throwing a chair.

22 July 2008, 1:20 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (Cornerstone member):

Quoting Eruaran:
20 years ago Linux did not exist.

Thanks for pointing this pedantic fact out !
Linus Torvald screwed around with Unix in 1991 (17 years ago !)




22 July 2008, 4:04 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

todd_h86 (Cornerstone member):

Did I read that correctly? I must be seeing a typo of some sort linux is suited to just about any task? are you sure? Im sorry you may need to minimise that awesome game of Barbie's horse super fun time, whats that its a screenshot cause your linux box play Barbie's horse super fun time jeez and to think someone say linux can do just about anything except play your fav game! must be hard!


BTW I have been utilising Vista on my domain here in a BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT for about 6 months now and once we got past some application teething issues and gave a brief training update (30 min is enough) and all is good! So glad we tossed out that old linux server for a 2008 sbsserver brought a tear to my eye A TEAR OF JOY!!!! AHAHAHAHAAHAHAH

22 July 2008, 12:27 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Your Average Joe (Regular user):

Quoting todd_h86:
BTW I have been utilising Vista on my domain here in a BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT

I was told Vista was hopeless for desktops, let alone for a server !
and that immediate translation to Linux was essential because the rest of the world is using and because it was FREE ...... hee hee ;)




22 July 2008, 1:43 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Despite being nearly incomprehensible, I'll reply anyway...

Games? That's a big market segment... All 5% or so of it. The biggest users and buyers of computers are businesses. Who tend to want to run office type software.
Besides, it's down to the game publisher. You don't complain about Windows being incapable because it won't run a Playstation game, do you?

The second part of your comment only goes to show you are a Microsoft sucker. The training to go from XP to Vista is about the same amount required to go from WinXP to MacOSX or Linux. And replacing an OLD linux box with SBS suggests perhaps it was slow and clunky due to the hardware, and perhaps due to it's lack of maintenance (clearly you didn't set it up).

22 July 2008, 2:15 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Your Average Joe (Regular user):

Quoting Tin:
Games? That's a big market segment... All 5% or so of it.

Don't belittle this market, Tin !
Do you honestly believe we would need quad core cpu's, 4 gigs of RAM to browse the web and word processing. Intel, AMD, Creative, Logitech and many others ramp a high percentage of their R&D focus on the gaming industry (console and PC) !
As the Linux geeks keep reminding us all, all you need is a 486 to run Ubuntu and OpenOffice ! ..... If this were the target market all the major IT supergiants would be broke !




22 July 2008, 2:55 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jeff (User):

Quoting Your Average Joe:
Do you honestly believe we would need quad core cpu's, 4 gigs of RAM to browse the web and word processing

We aren't far off of needing a computer like that that - you really need 2GB RAM and dual core processor to run Vista (unless you like waiting a few seconds after every click...). So if the next version of Windows jumps the requirements by as much as Vista did requiring that sort of hardware won't be a far fetched as it sounds...

24 July 2008, 3:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (Cornerstone member):

Quoting Jeff:
We aren't far off of needing a computer like that that - you really need 2GB RAM and dual core processor to run Vista

It won't matter !
Just look at the price of computer hardware .... you can buy a decent core 2 duo cpu and 2 gigs of RAM for less than a tank of petrol for an SS Commodore !




24 July 2008, 4:30 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting Me In Oz:
you can buy a decent core 2 duo cpu and 2 gigs of RAM for less than a tank of petrol for an SS Commodore !

You can buy a dozen eggs for less than price of a CPU and RAM but it will be equally useless at improving the quarter times or fuel economy of your red army racer. And equally has little if any relevance to Intel's new found favour for Linux.


26 July 2008, 11:15 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

todd_h86 (Cornerstone member):

Well actually Sony have numerous complaints from me about not making singstar pc compatible I mean come on the hair brush just doesnt cut it no days! even though I didnt set up the OLD (thought linux was meant for OLD systems..) linux box (it was a private system owned by the software company..... yeah....) and games is a little bit more than 5% where do you get your statistics from? O and speaking of 5%.... isnt that the linux share of the desktop pc market... Dont let my Microsoft jacket, coffee mug and hat fool you I use what is the best for my situation. I think linux has its place but just because Intel decided to go with it for the entry phase of the atom cpu era doesnt mean Windows is dead or on the way out, how many of these units will they sell in comparsion to the rest of the pc sales? not sure either but I can see Intel doing an ASUS and slapping Windows on sometime down the track.

22 July 2008, 3:33 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (Cornerstone member):

Quoting todd_h86:
speaking of 5%.... isnt that the linux share of the desktop pc market

5% is very charitable for the OS share here in Oz !



24 July 2008, 9:52 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (Cornerstone member):

Quoting todd_h86:
doesnt mean Windows is dead or on the way out,

The Linux and Mac crowd would like you to think that if Miccosoft's OS share ever drops below 80% ....... then this would be a clear indication that MS is dead and buried !!!!

Even at 50% they are still making billions and whooping both your butts :)




24 July 2008, 9:56 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jami (New user):

PromotingLinux.com is also offering certificates after completing required reading on Linux vs. Windows findings of facts page.

22 July 2008, 10:49 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (User):

Of course it had to turn into Windows vs. Linux.

Intel are of course looking to increase its market share. The popular Linux areas they've been lacking in recent history have been the domain of AMD Opteron partners at the server end, and embedded systems dominated by Freescale, IBM, and TI.

22 July 2008, 6:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

carlosgames (New user):

just as a comment from a ex-LPIC customer, LPI certs are outdated, they currently even asks for usb configuration for deprecated kernel versions like 2.2.x branch, most of the questions are based on that branch and software depending on such stale kernels.

23 July 2008, 9:15 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

carlosgames (New user):

LPI certifications are very outdated, in april I did the exam and it was heavily focused in Kernel 2.2.x branch (deprecated kernel) and distro-specific commands (like old redhat software); I really regret to have paid 200 dlls for such cert.

23 July 2008, 9:24 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags