Intel’s second-gen Atom “not validated” for Windows 7 Home Premium or higher

David Flynn04 June 2009, 3:37 PM

Windows 7 Home Premium is not “the right solution” for netbooks, says Intel, so its forthcoming Pineview processors will be tested only for Windows 7 Starter and Home Basic.


Computex 2009 | Want to install any version of Windows 7 above Home Basic on your next netbook? Do so at your own risk, says Intel, because the forthcoming Pineview processor has been validated only for the entry-level Windows 7 editions of Starter and Home Basic.

“We are not going to validate it with Home Premium because we don’t believe it’s the right solution (for a netbook)” says Mooly Eden, vice-president and general manager of Intel’s Mobile Platforms Group.

“From the usage model, for what we believe the netbook category needs to serve, we believe the Windows 7 Starter or Home Basic will give you the right experience” Eden told APCmag.

“If somebody wants to do Premium he can do Premium, we don’t forbid it. It just means that we didn’t validate it, if there’ll be a bug or there will not be a bug...if you want to take responsibility then the responsibility is yours.”

The process of validation refers to intensive testing of the processor to ensure compatibility with both the operating system and applications. “You take many many systems, run random tests to see all the things that can happen and to see that the system works” Eden explains. “You just torture the systems to death.”

“You also do targeted validation where you try to create intentionally all kinds of things, you try to do this while this event is happening. We run all kinds of combinations of applications and opening windows to stress the system to the limit to see if it’s failing or passing, so you make sure you’ve got no surprises.”

“Validation today is as complicated and as important as the design itself” Eden says. “It’s very complicated. It’s a major effort we invest in to make sure (the processor) is working.”

David Flynn is attending Computex 2009 as a guest of Intel.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Now why the heck would the processor behave any different just because some extra apps are included?
Oh wait... It is MS we're talking about. They probably do have bugs that will only show up under certain CPU configs with certain sub-versions.

04 June 2009, 4:43 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

itd (User):

Quoting Tin:
Now why the heck would the processor behave any different just because some extra apps are included?


Yeah I was wondering the same thing - surely all versions of Windows 7 are based on the same code...

04 June 2009, 7:59 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Your Average Joe (Regular user):

Why the heck would you want Premium or higher on a netbook anyway?
I would have thought that the netbook was used for a bit of word processing, emails and surfing the net. But I can see that MS is copping flack already just because it's 'Windows'!

04 June 2009, 9:41 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Business users might like to use Business edition on theirs. NSW DET are going to be running Win7 on Atom powered netbooks, and I doubt they'll be using Starter or Basic purely because there's going to be tens of thousands of them all wanting to be managed a la Active Directory.

05 June 2009, 2:22 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Aubrey (Cornerstone member):

Agree that this isn't really a big deal - But it so nice to see Intel having a crack at MS like this. I'd also like to see Google issue a press release saying that they cannot be held responsible if your computer explodes when using Google apps on Windows 7.

This would be just a small percentage of the FUD owed to MS after years and years of them spraying it around.

05 June 2009, 11:00 AM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags