Internet-enabled TVs: we don't want 'em

Angus Kidman
06 January 2010, 4:34 PM


CES 2010: Aussies might complain at the lack of Net-enabled TVs here, but people who have them can't be bothered using them.


A recurring theme at CES in recent years has been Internet-enabled televisions: TVs ready to have an Ethernet cable plugged into the back and then to deliver a range of online content, ranging from YouTube to NetFlix movie rentals to specialised Yahoo! gadgets.

From an Australian perspective, these developments have often seemed largely irrelevant, if only because few of these televisions make it down under, and even fewer of the connected services (NetFlix is the most visible participant in these deals and has precisely zero interest in the Aussie market, for starters). However, while we've been busy quietly seething with jealousy, it turns out that our American cousins have been busy ignoring all those glamorous new connectivity features.

It's not that the sets aren't out there. In 2009, Ethernet-enabled televisions were the second-fastest growing consumer electronics category in North America, with sales up by 830%, according to the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA). In 2010, that growth will slip to 129%, but the overall number of sets able to be connected will continue to rise.

"Roughly 20% of the TVs shipped in 2010 will be Ethernet enabled and connected, crossing 50% in 2013," said CEA chief economist Shawn DuBravac during a pre-show media briefing at CES.

However, getting consumers to actually use those options is a bit more of a challenge. "In our research, we continuously find that when consumers connect their TVs to the Internet, they're overwhelmed by the possibilities," DuBravac noted.

The figures bear that out. Almost two-thirds of US consumers have not connected their TV to the Internet. Indeed, viewing TV and watching DVD movies remain by far the most common uses for the box. Gaming -- a well-established and multi-billion dollar industry -- only happens on 43% of US sets.

Even that looks impressive compared to online activities. Just 8% of TV owners have used their TVs to view downloaded content, 6% for Internet access and 4% email.

A partial explanation may be that the tightly-integrated experience of services such as iTunes with the iPod or Amazon with the Kindle haven't been replicated in most TV environments. "Consumers are demanding a seamless experience," DuBravac said. "In the past, we'd buy these kinds of services in isolation."


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

petert (Advanced Forumologist):

Some technology companies have lost sight of the old adage, "Just because you can doesn't mean you should!"

06 January 2010, 6:14 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

I don't want an internet enabled TV - I want a TV with a computer built in.

I suspect the reasons people are ignoring the features of these ethernet enabled TVs is that they suck. Just like so many network media players suck because they are limited scope and don't play half the stuff you wanted it for.

06 January 2010, 6:17 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Big Boi (New user):

Not to mention the crappy speed and data allowance that we get here. It will take 4 hours to download a movie and your data limit will expire in a week.

06 January 2010, 8:53 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

bluemoon4281 (New user):

TV and DVDs are some of the easyist electronics we use; put in the disc and press 'play'. Trying to get a TV to search YouTube using a remote (has to be better than programming VCRs) or talk to a server to browse files, and then coping with the myriad of codecs...it's no wonder these things aren't working. Any of these sets in the US have Netflix? They would stand a better chance; after logon it'd be just point and click.

06 January 2010, 11:55 PM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Ausman (New user):

Why try and build a pc into a tv when they are better as separately connected compontents?

12 January 2010, 3:15 AM (3 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user