Internode adds 3G wireless data to its broadband menu

David Flynn
27 April 2009, 12:01 PM


The popular ISP’s new NodeMobile Data plans repackage Optus 3G from $15 per month for 250MB, with excess usage blocks starting at $10 for 250MB.


This week sees Internode roll out its anticipated wireless broadband service as an add-on service for the ISP’s existing customers. The NodeMobile Data service, to be launched tomorrow, uses the Optus 3G network and comes in two plans: 250MB per month for $15, and 3GB for $40.

Optus’ own off-the-shelf plans plans start at 2GB for $40, 5GB for $50 and 6GB for $60, but with a $10 per month discount on each plan when bundled with an Optus mobile or landline service.

So while Internode’s 3GB/$40 plan is a better deal (one extra GB of data per month) than you’d get if you aren’t already an Optus subscriber, existing Optus customers are better off to the tune of 2GB per month for the same price.

However, if you require only small doses of wireless broadband while out and about through the month, Internode’s $15 plan provides a cheaper entry point than Optus.

Internode users can also buy data blocks to cover excess usage: these will be charged at  $10 for 250MB, $20 for 500MB and $40 for 1GB. It’s worth noting that these all equate to 4c per MB, which is a substantial discount over Optus’ excess usage charges of 15c/MB.

So even if you expect to use only an extra 100MB of wireless data towards the end of the month you’re better off paying Internode $10 for a 250MB block than paying Optus $15 for just that 100MB.

As with the Optus plans, Internode customers can score a ‘free’ USB 3B modem – which works on both the 2100MHz and 900MHz 3G networks – for signing a 24 month contract.

However, if you’re already got a 3G USB or ExpressCard modem Internode can also supply just the Optus SIM card for $25.

The biggest caveat to all of this remains Internode’s choice of the Optus network. While the performance of all wireless networks is often subject to one’s specific location, testing by APC magazine has consistently found Optus to be among the worst for latency and speed.

This is most noticeable, and most galling, in built-up areas such as the Sydney and North Sydney CBD – the exact places where you’d expect the network to be geared up for high demand.

Of course, Internode isn’t the only major-league ISP to offer 3G wireless to its broadband customers. iiNet has partnered with 3 to offer wireless broadband deals starting at $29 for 3G. These are basically the same rates as you’d get from 3 if you were an existing 3 customer – the only ‘saving’ is that you don’t pay an extra $5 per month for the USB modem.

It’s worth noting that the modem currently offered by iiNet is the 2100MHz-only MF627 Internet Key, not the newer dual-band E160 ‘MEGA 3G’ modem which allows roaming onto the 850MHz Next G network.

iiNet also offers a prepaid 3G bundle of the MF627 key for $99, against 3’s standard retail of $129, with pre-paid packs starting at $15 for 500MB.

While our tests show 3 to deliver consistently higher speeds and lower latency than Optus there’s no denying that the Optus network has far greater coverage.

3’s 3G network remains limited to most (but not all) capital cities plus Wollongong and the Gold Coast. If you want wireless broadband outside those areas you’ll need to roam onto Telstra’s Next G network at a cost of 50c/MB.

And if you don’t have a dual-band 3G modem you can roam onto Telstra’s GSM network and pay $1.65/MB for the equivalent of wireless dial-up...


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

agami (New user):

As the government builds the FTTP NBN the telcos are poised for a battle in the wireless space. More bandwidth, more coverage, more services, more flexibility, more ripping off the customer @ 4 cents/MB.

27 April 2009, 1:02 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kmason (New user):

Is this kind of expensive?

27 April 2009, 2:29 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kmason (New user):

Isn't this kind of expensive?

27 April 2009, 2:29 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

kmacp (New user):

Isn't this kind of expensive for the GB/month?

27 April 2009, 2:34 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (New user):

Yes. Data actually costs them less than 0.1 of a cent. A lot of the time the data price is intended to minimise uptake as the service might not be capable of a large influx and also sometime the billing system isn't quite up to the task either. So we have to pay for their inadequacies.

It has been proven time and time again, you reduce the price you increase consumption beyond the perceived loss due to price reduction.

27 April 2009, 5:10 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Have APC tested any ISPs using the Optus wireless network but not using the Optus DNS, routing, etc? I'm under the impression most of the slowness issues only exist for connections fully reliant on Optus systems (Optus and Virgin basically)...
There are posts on the Exetel forums that slowness went away the day Exetel switched over to their own network (and they use the Optus wireless network).

27 April 2009, 6:05 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan Warne (Regular user):

It would be very interesting to do that comparison. I will ask Internode for a test service and see how it goes compared to an Optus retail service.

28 April 2009, 11:18 AM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

LukeE (New user):

Quoting Dan Warne:
I will ask Internode for a test service and see how it goes compared to an Optus retail service.

How about trying to get an Exetel one aswell? Show how a couple of different ISPs on the same network perform :)


29 April 2009, 8:10 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Peter Ortner (New user):

I think it's time that APC retested the major services as eight months have passed since APC's previous in-depth testing. IME Virgin BB is now significantly faster than Telstra, and latency is not significantly greater (often the same).

29 April 2009, 2:11 PM (4 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user