iPad vs iPad 2 back-to-back: what's new, plus all the specs compared

Peter Dockrill
03 March 2011, 2:12 PM


We take you through the new features of the iPad 2 step by step, and compare the new model's techs and specs against the pioneering original.


And so, in one of the most anticipated product launches of the year - and one which probably leaves last week's not insignificant Sandy Bridge debut on the Mac well in the shade - Apple has finally taken the veil off the iPad 2. It'll be out in Australia as soon as March 25, so what are the new features in the new iPad 2, and overall how does it compare to the original iPad? Here's our run-down of everything you need to know from a specifications point of view.


Thin is in: iPad 2 in all its svelte glory.

The most significant differentiator between the iPad and its successor is the iPad 2's new processor, the 1GHz dual-core A5 CPU, which succeeds the A4 found in the original iPad. Apple claims the dual-core A5 is up to twice as fast as the single-core A4, with graphics performance said to be up to nine times faster. This should make a real difference in the overall speed and responsiveness of the device, particularly when it comes to games, but also in relation to some of the more heavy-duty media-editing apps which Apple also announced today (namely iMovie for iPad and GarageBand for iPad).


If the iPad 2 is going to succeed at becoming a gaming powerhouse like Apple wants it to, it'll need all the juice from its new dual-core A5 processor.

Both the A4 and A5 are low-power chips, and as a result battery life hasn't changed. The iPad 2 still features a 25-watt-hour rechargeable lithium-polymer battery, which Apple claims will deliver 10 hours of battery life when only using Wi-Fi (which drops to nine hours when 3G connectivity is utilised in the 3G version). On this account, while Apple isn't delivering better battery performance from an hour-on-hour perspective, the significance of the accomplishment here is that Apple has managed to deliver equal battery performance from a significantly smaller device.


Everything's relative: the iPad 2 is significantly skinnier than its predecessor, and Apple claims it's more comfortable to hold.

Measurements-wise, the iPad 2 is thinner and lighter than its predecessor, although the display size itself is unchanged at 9.7 inches diagonally (and it still offers a 1,024 x 768 resolution). The iPad 2 is 33 per cent thinner than the iPad, measuring 8.8mm thick compared to the original's 13.4mm, and it's up to 15 per cent lighter than the original, weighing 601g for the Wi-Fi only version (or 613g for the 3G) compared to the iPad's respective 680g and 730g footprints.


Apple says it's redefining the iPad: the iPad 2's ability to perform processor-intensive tasks like video editing (in the new iMovie for iPad app, seen here) will be a hallmark of the new generation of tablets we'll see this year.

The other physical dimensions are understandably not as reduced (given that the display's size is unchanged): the iPad 2 measures 241.2 by 185.7mm, compared to the iPad's 242.8 by 189.7mm. The structural barrier around the rim of the original iPad's framing has been removed, which results in the iPad 2's thinner, unibody housing. The iPad 2 is available in either black or white, whereas the original was black only, and the same storage capacities have been preserved, with the iPad 2 for sale in 16GB, 32GB and 64GB models.


With the addition of the new cameras on the iPad 2, Apple has rolled out FaceTime chat across iPod, iPhone, iPad and Mac product lines.

Perhaps the most obvious new addition feature-wise in the inclusion of two new cameras for photos, video recording and webcam chat (or, in Apple's lexicon, 'FaceTime'). The back-facing HD camera records video in 720p at up to 30fps and also functions as a still camera, although Apple sneakily hasn't disclosed its megapixel count. The front-facing camera captures VGA-quality video and stills. Video out support has also been upgraded, from up to 576p on the original iPad to up to 1080p on the iPad 2 (with the relevant adapters, sold separately).


Apple has upgraded video out capabilities with the iPad 2, which now offers 1080p video mirroring (with the correct separately sold adapter, of course).

The Wi-Fi capabilities of the Wi-Fi only iPad 2 are unchanged from the original iPad's spec, although the iPad 2 3G model now incorporates support for UMTS / HSDPA / HSUPA (850, 900, 1,900, 2,100MHz) and GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900MHz). The iPad 2 features the same accelerometer and ambient light sensor as the iPad, but also includes a new three-axis gyroscope, which should add a new level of sensitivity and control (especially in games).


The iPad's new gyroscope should offer enhanced sensitivity and control in gameplay.

To address screen scratch issues which plagued the original iPad, Apple is releasing a new iPad 2 accessory dubbed Smart Cover, a lightweight, segmented display cover available in a range of colours, which magnetically clings and self-aligns to the iPad 2's body. The iPad 2 automatically wakes and sleeps when the Smart Cover is removed and attached, and additionally can convert into a mini stand for the tablet. It's a neat feat of design and a likely must-buy for iPad 2 purchasers, although third party makers of iPad accessories will understandably be less thrilled by the new peripheral.


Smart Cover: clings like a primary-coloured alien parasite. Apple should have done this years ago.

All in all, Apple is offering a significantly revamped tablet in the iPad 2. Going off the specs and new features, it's faster, lighter and can do more, and it's definitely the iPad to be considering (although some last-minute deals on the original iPad are certainly tempting).


Showing its trademark style nous, Apple's Smart Cover enables you to personalise your otherwise fairly uniform iPad 2.

Having said that, despite Apple's effervescent spin doctoring, the iPad 2 certainly doesn't seem to deliver the same "magical" (their term) wow factor that the original iPad had in droves. Back then, it was the only killer tablet on the block, but now, with so many feature-packed competitor devices already in the market or on their way very soon, the iPad 2 is no longer the only option out there for shoppers. There's no doubt that Apple has a strong offering in the iPad 2 and a healthy lead on the rest of the pack, but will 2011 really be the year of the iPad 2 as Steve Jobs claims, or has Apple's original 2010 game changer gone and changed the game on Apple?


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Tin (User):

The fanbois will rush out to get one, as always... But I suspect it'll be a non-event for the regular consumer. Sounds like Apple agree given the pricing is the same as the original, suggesting they plan to just roll over from 1 to 2.

Meanwhile, those who can see through Apple's "shiny" will continue buying to meet their own needs instead of believing the "magical" hype.

03 March 2011, 4:35 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

jenny chan (User):

Maybe it's just me, but I feel like I bought my first generation iPad just yesterday (last August actually) and now here's another, better one. I am getting upgrade fatigue...

03 March 2011, 6:06 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Advanced Forumologist):

I love it when people refer to the iPad as a failure. It reminds me of Greg Norman, whom many considered a failure. He had a multi-million dollar a year income, celebrity status, a glamorous lifestyle, a huge home, a boat worth tens of millions as so on. Clearly, these were the obvious signs of a failure . . . NOT! And so to the iPad - 15 million sold so far. Yep, that certainly smacks of failure!(Every bit of sarcasm intended!)

03 March 2011, 6:14 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Peter Rublevsky (User):

Just had a look at the specs of the iPad 2...WTF? Still NO USB port. Still no decent file explorer to easily move files on and off the device. Yes, it's prettier, faster chip, and with two cameras. Big woop. Apple's upgraded the media player functions basically, but as a computer, it's still crippleware. Android tablets with Honeycomb and USB ports will leave this in the dust.

03 March 2011, 7:56 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

i agree with petert. The ipad, even thou i bag it alot, was a success. and peter r, it's not a supposed to be a computer. it's a multimedia device, like a kindle on roids.

i read lots on my iphone. and it's a touch too small. the ipad i dont like, cos it's a touch too big. i can deal with a little too small. And you can't make phone calls with it.

(i guess if you could you'd look pretty silly holdin it to your ear).

why do you want a USB port? you get a data cable you can plug into you computer. there are apps you can get to do the whole file explorer thing, and you can even set up so you can drag drop files on and off the devices with an app...

i'm not an apple fan boy. i have macs and i hate itunes, but the idevices are close to perfect. and now that you can easily stream between devices, the appleTV2's looking pretty cool

03 March 2011, 11:15 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

rah... have macs = hate macs...

03 March 2011, 11:16 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

deusexmachina (New user):

@Peter If you're after USB (which you can add btw) or file managers then you really are wasting your time with Apple. Apple is about accessing your content thru content managers like iTunes. Most of their devices are aimed at using apps, not managing files (and their associated apps) which is still pretty foreign to most people. There will be plenty of alternatives if you don't like, but this thing will also sell like hotcakes and I avoided V1 as I wanted the bump in specs, so yep, I'll be in line to buy one for traveling...

04 March 2011, 10:39 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

* 15 million sold to a market measured in billions is not a raving success. I'd have called 100 million a success. 15 million is easily still within the realms of fanbois + curious people.

* "have macs = hate macs" - I do both personally :P
I can't stand Apple's arrogance, the overpriced products, etc, but I do own a few older Macs that I've picked up over the years (newest is an "eMac" CRT all in one, although I gutted that to make a fishtank).

* Why doesn't APC's reply button work still?

04 March 2011, 3:22 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (User):

@Tin

15,000,000 x $600 for one product is still successful in any one's language. Apple's competition daylight away from this achievement.

This doesn't include the aftermarket sales.

APC !!!!!!!!! the reply button please !!!!!!!!

04 March 2011, 5:46 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

TV Bis (New user):

Can you view sites using Flash on this new IPad?

No?

Failure!

05 March 2011, 9:15 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

Of course it can't do Flash. Everyone knows Flash causes mobile device batteries to drain in 15 seconds and then burst into flames.
The lack of Flash certainly has nothing to do with controlling the app market and preventing publishers from side-stepping the Apple tax... Nothing at all. I swear. Steve Jobs told me all this himself.

05 March 2011, 10:28 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

You all do realize that "fixing the reply button" probably means rebuilding the site.

i'll be no-one here that's commenting on this has much if any idea about the in's and out's of a CMS back end or coding in PHP or ASP or what ever this is coded in, (guessing by looking @ the code, .NET or ASP), how hard it would be to fix something that would be a core feature of the site.

after spending, personally near 48 hours over the last 3 weeks fixing broken stuff after doing a security patch, for a website that i didn't build personally, "fixing the reply button" would be low on my things to fix...

Fixing the Edit button on the other hand.... :)

06 March 2011, 6:57 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

... i'll be = i'll bet.... fix edit case in point

One thing missed is the fact that the HDMI addaptor is also comptable with the Iphone4, AND with then new iOS 4.3 you can direct stream to an apple TV2 with the flick of a finger, for iPod touch current gen, iPad 1g and 2g, and Iphone 3gs and 4g.

Makes more sence that the AppleTV2 exsists, (that and the fact that once you've Jailbroken an ATV2, you can install XMBC on it, with like 4 commands?)

06 March 2011, 7:07 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (User):

OK ss-rotel... Bait taken...
The biggest reason edit and reply aren't working would be because "openWindow" is not defined.
Now, I don't know where openWindow was meant to be defined, but I'd guess that the fact CMSScripts.js is missing would suggest it used to be defined in there.
Fixing the issue therefore is likely to be as simple as recovering that file from a backup...

I know all too well how complex a CMS is - which is why it's best not to reinvent them when there's hundreds of free and commercial solutions already out there. Just pick one that fulfills the needs and use it. Don't stuff around trying to make a new one - this one is proof that it's a bad idea.

06 March 2011, 8:06 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC Editor (Moderator):

hey everyone, thanks for alerting us to the problems. The developers assure us they are now fixed!

07 March 2011, 11:21 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Me In Oz (User):

Quoting APC Editor:
The developers assure us they are now fixed!


Just testing ...... and it works :)


07 March 2011, 11:43 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC Editor (Moderator):

Probably not giving too much away when I say that this site's CMS (and UI)are not long for this world.

07 March 2011, 12:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

if it was that easy to fix, then why hasn't someone fixed it then? this has been ongoing for ages.

Maybe it breakes something in the site, and removing the openwindow call is the easiest way to stop the prcedure from breaking the site.

I've tried to post a comment, (2 now), on the sound card review, and it's excepting my comment, and ever saying that there's x number of comments, but displaying, (to me anyway), x-2 comments.

meh, not my site, not my issue to fix. all conjecture.

07 March 2011, 9:50 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

oh, and the Flash thing, you know it's cos Adobe and Apple dont really like eash other...

or more to the point, one of them doesn't wanna pay the fees that the other want to charge to have it on the platform.

not that it dont work, or it drains power, infact Flash is basically Mpeg with Java, just a greed thing

07 March 2011, 9:53 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

deusexmachina (New user):

@TV Bis ... been using an iPhone for almost 3 years now and can't say I'm missing flash.

07 March 2011, 11:09 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

deusexmachina (New user):

@Tin, I'm a little confused as when you say

"Meanwhile, those who can see through Apple's "shiny" will continue
buying to meet their own needs instead of believing the "magical" hype."

If the iPad meets my needs then what should I buy ??? The problem with most of the naysayers on this is that they always look at the iPad as a standalone device ... but it isn't a standalone device!!! If I need a tablet and I use a Mac and an iPhone already, why would a by a Xoom??? just because it's got better hardware specs... Apple worked out long ago that the vast majority of people really don't care about hardware specs, they leave that to hardware geeks arguing about that on forums.

07 March 2011, 11:16 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Nato (New user):

If it had of had a 1920x1080 screen and 512gb hdd I would have bought one, but by the looks of things that will be next years model, it really should have had the same pixel pitch as the iPhone 4 but cost probably ruled that out, then 3d in 2013 If the world does not end next year lol.

07 March 2011, 11:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

ss-rotel (User):

I don't understand. When you can now get a device like this, that does sooo much for soo little $$$, (Case in point, 16gb 1G, $398 from Big W), name me something else that gives you this much, for this amount of money.

I still can't see a need for one personally. Have my iphone and my laptop, haven't found a need for it yet, but when my son's a little older, for sure, i'll get one.

He's 1, so not for a bit i guess... maybe 5g ipad? :)

08 March 2011, 10:56 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

AlexF (New user):

The best thing about iPad is that finally, this market and this form-factor is getting traction. How many opportunities Microsoft squandered in beating Apple to this market, it's unbelievable.
I am still waiting for a Windows 7 tablet - how many more years, Microsoft?

06 April 2011, 6:52 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user