iPhone users are download crazy

Angus Kidman23 September 2008, 10:20 AM

iPhone users consume six times as much data as the users of other mobile Internet devices, confirming that Apple's device has had a dramatic impact on the mobile content market.


An analysis of Australian browsing habits during the first two weeks of August by mobile content management company Amethon Solutions found that the average length of time to visit a site on an iPhone was 2 minutes and 45 seconds, compared to 1:37 for the typical mobile browser.

iPhone users even beat out desktop users, who averaged 2:24 on the selection of sites profiled by Amethon. Average page views per visit are higher on the iPhone, at 5.1 pages per visit compared to 3.0 for all mobile users.

iPhone users also consume much more data than the typical user. The dominant form of content viewed was video, which accounted for 87% of traffic, suggesting that new iPhone owners keen to show off their new toy head straight for the video clips.

"The data consumption was something that really stood out for us," said Amethon CTO James Cleary "There was a hugely different data consumption compared to the average mobile."

No other mobile phone has had such an obvious impact on data consumption patterns, Amethon CEO Michael Stone said. "The iPhone is a device unto itself at the moment, especially in the Australian market." One important factor in that figure is that the iPhone defaults to showing regular web sites rather than bandwidth-optimised mobile versions, Cleary suggested.

Over time, those figures will probably shrink slightly, Cleary said. "It's in the first month of launch, so there's probably a lot of ad hoc demonstration. You would expect that to drop a little."

At that point, users will become keener on hunting down specialised sites, Cleary predicted: "Publishers should get serious about producing iPhone-optimised versions of their site."

Another option is to produce iPhone-specific applications for sale through Apple's App Store, but that may not always make business sense. "As much press as the iPhone gets, it's actually a very small proportion of the overall user base," said Stone. "Anyone who wants to build a business on that will face a lot of competition. You really need to pick your market."

The iPhone has already had a significant impact in moving telcos away from a "walled garden" approach of network-exclusive content, though Stone said that shift should not be overestimated. "The App Store is a new walled garden but in a different sense. It's quite a challenge for the operators to know how to handle that."

Apple's biggest long-term challenge will probably come from Google and its Android platform, Cleary suggested.
"Search will be absolutely critical in the mobile domain. People are using Google Search a lot more." On the iPhone, 97% of searches are coming from Google.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

tfacter (User):

being an iphone user i find i spend more time browsing pages. it used to be id spend the 1:30 waiting for a pgge to load only to find that the mobile phones browser was junk. now i can read full pages my only issue is that adobe havent managed to bring flash to mobiles and i have serious doubts that it ever will


23 September 2008, 11:26 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Hemma (User):

Hmm....

http://www.adobe.com/mobile/supported_devices/handsets.html

And Your leader moans about how its not good enough for your precious phone.

23 September 2008, 11:55 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

If Flash Lite on those devices is anything like Flash for PocketPC, it probably won't thrill the user any.
I'm yet to see Flash for PocketPC actually do anything... Either on my device or any of my friends.

23 September 2008, 12:39 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

tfacter (User):

I agree with Tin. I'm sure its capable of presenting the worlds "hello world" on it. Wow i normally get accused of being to windows/pc does this now mean im an apple fan. I hope not.

23 September 2008, 1:02 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

What part of that six times factor, was downloading iPhone patches, fixes and update releases?

24 September 2008, 8:14 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Senior member):

Quoting Raindog:
What part of that six times factor, was downloading iPhone patches, fixes and update releases?

The answer to your question can be inferred from the article, "The dominant form of content viewed was video, which accounted for 87% of traffic, . . ." That leaves only 13% for everything else - viewing webpages, downloading games and of courses patches, fixes and updates. So, it would seem that downloading patches, fixes and updates is a very small part of the six times factor.



24 September 2008, 10:10 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

Quoting Raindog:
What part of that six times factor, was downloading iPhone patches, fixes and update releases?

So you're trying to say that you prefer a phone that is never up-to-date, never gets new free features and doesn't have a company behind it willing to stick out the issues? Fine, well no one made the updates compulsory.

25 September 2008, 4:32 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting McBanjo:
So you're trying to say that you prefer a phone that is never up-to-date, never gets new free features and doesn't have a company behind it willing to stick out the issues?

No I prefer a phone that just works, over any show & tell gadget requiring constant maintenance. The garbage that Apple, Nokia, Sony etc
are dishing out is inexcusable. But i guess that suits the download crazy.


25 September 2008, 5:01 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

The iPhone just works. In fact the v1 firmware versions were the fastest and most stable of the lot IMO. Nothing requires you to upgrade any more than you want to do it. But as with most people, the new feature sets are impossible to ignore against any possible reliability issues.

25 September 2008, 6:42 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting McBanjo:
So you're trying to say that you prefer a phone that is never up-to-date, never gets new free features and doesn't have a company behind it willing to stick out the issues?


Is that a joke? Apple's crippled the iPhone so that it's full potential can never be legally reached.
My HTC phones were kept up to date in a similar fashion of breaking EULAs and such...

25 September 2008, 5:20 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

McBanjo (User):

Quoting Tin:
Apple's crippled the iPhone so that it's full potential can never be legally reached.

What exactly has Apple crippled in the iPhone so much that it can't reach it's full potential? The only things I can think of are things which Apple are deliberately blocking since they plan to release something of their own into the future. Which is absolutely necessary, since less people would buy an iPhone if it had no future.

The thing is that the iPhone will always have more potential than something which you have full reign over. There needs to be the trust and stability so the device can be mass distributed and build a large user-base. Initiatives like iPwn and QuickPwn (which are totally unlike anything ever done before) would never be possible with HTC, purely because there isn't the initiative out there to make a great software solution which will only benefit 10,000 people vs. a few million.

So you can see the iPhone has already burst past the potential of all other phones, making new ground, purely because they didn't allow users to tarnish (or worse brick) their iPhone experience.

25 September 2008, 6:20 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Senior Forumologist):

Quoting McBanjo:
The thing is that the iPhone will always have more potential than something which you have full reign over.

On for those who like all the thinking done for them, regardless of the cost.


Quoting McBanjo:
purely because there isn't the initiative out there to make a great software solution which will only benefit 10,000 people vs. a few million.

10,000 for where? Western Sydney? I'd be checking your numbers again, and I don't think you could accuse HTC or similar of lacking initiative. After all these companies have produced relative equivalent products to market for a pittance in comparison to the budget Apple consumed.


Quoting McBanjo:
So you can see the iPhone has already burst past the potential of all other phones

By what possible measure? They still haven't managed to get the phone bit of iPhone working well.


Quoting McBanjo:
purely because they didn't allow users to tarnish (or worse brick) their iPhone experience.

Is that the iPhone experience that had the faithful (and the bewildered) queued up on winter nights to pay over the odds for poor value contracts? Or some other experience?

Yes iPhone has made a considerable impact, but only the true believers could confuse this with a a paradigm shift in the entire marketplace.


25 September 2008, 7:08 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

petert (Senior member):

"Apple's biggest long-term challenge will probably come from Google and its Android platform, Cleary suggested.
"Search will be absolutely critical in the mobile domain. People are using Google Search a lot more." "

This quotation from the article raises an interesting issue - will Apple start a search engine or buy one?

24 September 2008, 10:13 AM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply
24 October 2008, 10:46 PM (1 year ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags