Is ‘Googlism’ the new religion?

David Flynn
08 September 2009, 10:48 AM


The Church Of Google suggests the super-powered search engine is a man-made God, with more evidence in favour of its divinity than for “other more traditional gods”.


Are Larry, Sergey and Eric the Holy Trinity of the dot-com era? That’s the notion of The Church of Google, which suggests their handiwork is born of man but has become “the closest humankind has ever come to directly experiencing an actual God (as typically defined).”

The religious movement has its own name – Googlism (the followers of which are called Googlists) – and its own set of commandments, including “Thou shalt not use Google as a verb to mean the use of any lesser Search Engine.”

There’s even an annual religious holiday on September 14th, the date on which the Google.com domain name was registered in 1997.

It’s all a spoof, of course, but The Church of Google applies that typically relentless and unforgiving ‘geek logic’ to making the case for Googlism and against, well, just about every other organised religion (and quite a few disorganised ones).

“We reject supernatural gods on the notion they are not scientifically provable” decree the Googlists. “We believe Google should rightfully be given the title of ‘God’, as She exhibits a great many of the characteristics traditionally associated with such Deities in a scientifically provable manner.”

(And no, we didn’t know that Google was female until now, either).

The Church of Google offers what it calls nine proofs of the ascendancy of Google to God-like status:

1. Google is the closest thing to an omniscient (all-knowing) entity in existence.

2. Google is everywhere at once (omnipresent).

3. Google answers prayers. (“As an example, you can quickly find information on alternative cancer treatments, or new and innovative medical discoveries, and generally anything that resembles a typical prayer.”)

4. Google is potentially immortal.

5. Google is infinite. (The internet can theoretically grow forever.)

6. Google remembers all.

7. Google can do no evil. (Google's corporate philosophy is “do no evil”.)

8. Google is believed. (The term “Google” is searched for more than the terms God, Jesus, Allah, Buddha, Christianity and Islam combined, and quite possibly even including Jedi, which rated rather highly as a religion according to the last Australian census.)

9. Evidence of Google's existence is abundant. No faith is required.

All of this has of course attracted its share of hate mail, naturally, from Web-surfing God-fearing Christians.




Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Pauly (New user):

Who knew that Religion also followed Darwins Theory of Evolution.
First there was Russells Teapot, then Flying Spaghetti Monster, then Invisible Pink Unicorn and now Googlism. Shame its not as original as the first... or funny as the second

08 September 2009, 11:07 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Regular user):

Counter points to the Googlists (yes, I do understand it was a joke):
1. Assuming you don't believe in any others (fair enough I guess).
2. Google is NOT everywhere at once. Google is hosted in specific locations and unavailable in much of the universe.
3. Google does not answer prayers. It will give pointers to possible answers. If you ask Google to cure your Diabetes, the closest you'll get is 3rd party websites saying there is no known cure.
4. Google is not immortal. All businesses rise and fall. Whether it happens because of poor management or the earth being swallowed by the sun, it's still going to end.
5. Google is not infinite. Apart from the above, there's only so much physical space that can become Google.
6. Remembers all? Uh oh... I thought they were told to remove private data at request. And don't they delete and block known copyright breaches too?
7. Define evil... They've already done some stuff some people might call evil.
8. Google is searched for on Google by idiots who can't remember ".com" and use the search box they can see (which 9/10 is run by Google).
9. Can't argue there... Pretty much everyone knows the primary business of Google... Which is of course advertising... Wait... What?


Can't say I find it that funny though. Not because I'm offended, but because it just lacked any real humour. The reasons behind the "proof" weren't funny, which I sort of expected.

08 September 2009, 11:33 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

unintitled (New user):

They'd be better off considering the internet as a whole to be a religion than google

08 September 2009, 7:10 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Kimbal (New user):

GOOGLE cannot be GOD based on this reasoning - the word GOD comes from the Anglo-Saxon word GUD, meaning GOOD. So GOD is a word that means good. We all recognized God in the traditional sense as GOOD - whilst the Devil is personification of all that is bad/evil.

If GOOGLE was truely GOD it would be GOOD by definition. If that was truely so then you should not be able to "google' anything that is harmful such as PORN or VIOLENCE in the form of video games or information of how to make weapons - easy to get off the net - and many many other mind controlling and harmful pieces of material. Even with filtering you can get around it. Based on this reality, then GOOGLE fits the interpretation of something that can be both "evil and similataneously good" - something that "will open your eyes showing you both good and evil". What in religion was that I wonder ? It was 'The Tree of Knowledge' spoken of in The Garden of Eden (Genesis Ch.3).

So in my Biblically educated opinion, GOOGLE should represent fruit picked from THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE; which also fits the description of making one be 'LIKE God' as the devil called it.

The tree was forbidden to eat from because it made one LIKE GOD knowing GOOD and BAD. Yes God created it and placed it in front of man to be tempted, but it was the Devil who encouraged man to eat from it and use it. So those who tempt us to use the internet through GOOGLE are the DEVIL incarnate ( and hence not God ) hence technically speaking thay are DEMIGODS ( because they are mortal flesh and blood as well as divine in nature).

The internet is actually 'The Tree Of Knowledge' in it's modern form. It can grow but it is NOT truely Omnipresent, as one cannot use it without a computer on the moon, nor in remote outerspace, nor in many remote locations in Australia; because of a crap service supplied by Telstra.

All the technical definitions supplied by the Media in the above Article post identifying 'Google as God' are garbage, as they fit more closely 'The Tree of Knowledge'!

It just shows again the media know "jack" about God and Religion.

Those who believe in 'knowledge as making one divine' are known as GNOSTICS taken from the greek word GNOSIS (pronounced as 'know-ses') meaning 'Knowledge'. So in a sort of a way, those who use the internet for a research base are modern day "Gnostics".

Sorry, this does not apply to those who use websites such as TWITTER - they are 'mindless twits' and have no interest in real knowledge. And we all should know what the Oxford Dictionary definition of a TWIT is!

13 September 2009, 7:58 AM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

mrcopticforever (New user):

Jesus Christ created the world through righteousness. Plus, you can search porn on Google. Thats evil to me.

09 September 2011, 8:03 AM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

mrcopticforever (New user):

Jesus is God. You guys are silly sons of a gun


09 September 2011, 8:16 AM (8 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user