ISPs warned over broadband fiddling

Dan Warne07 February 2007, 5:44 AM

Too many ISPs are fiddling with the speed, download limits and other contractual obligations of broadband internet services, the Ombudsman said today.


The Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman John Pinnock said today he was concerned about the growing number of complaints from internet customers who had had their contracts changed without their agreement.

Internet service providers are often not aware of their legal obligations in circumstances where they vary terms and conditions of their customers' fixed-terms contracts without first seeking agreement from customers, the Pinnock said.

"Most ISP's require customers to sign fixed-term contracts before they can receive a service," Pinnock said.

"Customers are telling us that often, after a short period of the contract has elapsed, they have received notification from their provider that the price of their plan will increase or that the speed or usage limits will be reduced."

According to the industry Consumer Contracts Code (developed with input from the service providers), a fixed-term contract may only be varied without the customer's agreement if the ISP gives the customer written notice three weeks before the change and the opportunity to cancel their service without fines.

"For example, an internet service provider may significantly lower the usage limits of its broadband plans and then seek to charge customers an early termination fee if they wish to cancel," Pinnock said.

"In these circumstances, the provider would be expected to offer customers appropriate notice and the chance to cancel without incurring fees for breaking their contracts."

The Ombudsman added that if a customer wanted to leave a contract where the terms and conditions had been varied without their consent, and to their detriment, the ISP could only recover any usage, installation and access charges outstanding at the date the contract ended.

If customers wanted to exit a contract which was being modified against their will, they could only be charged for equipment costs if that equipment could be used with another provider, Pinnock said.

All internet service providers are required by law to be members of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Scheme, which is entirely funded by ISPs depending on how many complaints, and the serverity of the complaints they get.

Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Jeffrey Tee:

I signed up with Ozemail, four years ago on their then popular 256/64 ADSL plan. When iinet bought over Ozemail, nothing much changed for well over a year, and when my contract with Ozemail expired, I continue with the same plan hoping that iinet would see fit and offer me a plan that was competitive with the likes of Internode. But after many of their promotional offers, I came to the conclusion that iinet was not interested with my internet business....it just wanted my phone line.
Finally in disgust I applied to Internode to 'churned" me over to their network. Only to be informed that iinet had without informing me, ported my service over to their ADSL+2 Dslam ports.
I am sure it makes good business sense to use their own equipment, rather then Telstra's....but where does that leave their disgruntled customers.
So is Ozemail now a participant in the Telstra Rapid Transfer Process? Will Ozemail port me back to Telstra so I can transfer my business to their more competitive rivals without first having to have my line deactivated, and then fork out another $129 to have my line reactivated in readiness for the ISP of my choice.
My contract was with Ozemail on a Telstra port. iinet did the switch to improve their bottom line, leaving Ozemail's, once happy customers to wither on the internet unless they play ball with iinet's ambition of being telco number 3, or have their service disrupted for anything up to 10 days....and another reconnection fee.
In short the ACCC should direct all ISP's to put into effect an arrangement whereby all their customers be able to switch provider without any disruption to their service, and the incurring of hefty fees. That is competition!
Jeffrey

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Handyman1943:

Well as I understand it ISP's have been getting away with murder simply because most people appear not to know their RIGHTS and are bluffed by staff on the phone. It is way past time some of the TV ads were scrutinised particularly for the unreadable fine print and low volume on the equivalent of fine print. I must say my current ISP Mcmedia.com.au are an exception and explain their contracts well and the help desk is actually helpful, But they are a relatively small player and in Country Victoria and appreciate country people and their needs.I spend some time regularly helping older people with their computers and Internet connections and contracts confuse them and they are bluffed by the big Telco,s sales staff and basically get ripped off and the Firewall is always the problem funny that its a problem only at certain times of the day.

29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Godwin Lee:

Also, in addition to monitoring complaints against ISPs. There should be a case against poor customer service + service difficulties. Having Telstra to correct a problem was a nightmare, being defensive, sending technicians who didn't know what they were doing.

After multiple complaints to the their complaints department, we never received any feedback. Chances are the complains just go into a black hole.

I have Optus now, they are great, if you have a service difficulty they will help you narrow down and troubleshoot the issue, rather than denying that there was any fault.

I've also found out that my colleague who is also on Telstra, that lives in my area (probably on the same exchange) is having the same cable problem that I was having prior to giving up and joining Optus (Cable hangs, having to reboot modem). Until today, the problem still hasn't been resolved, and yet. Telstra denies that there is a problem.

Who will hear my cry?




29 February 2008, 8:29 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Psyber:

Try writing to your federal MP and having them put in a representation on your behalf to the Minister. I found both Telstra and Optus got active after Helen Coonan had contactd them on my behalf.

29 February 2008, 8:37 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags