LEAKED: Vista SP1 analysed in-depth

James Bannan11 August 2007, 1:13 PM

EXCLUSIVE |We've gone under the hood of the leaked beta of Vista SP1 to find out exactly what it will do for you. One thing we can say right now:huge performance increase.


Help more people find out about this story!
Slashdot Slashdot Digg Digg StumbleUpon StumbleUpon Del.icio.us Del.icio.us

It's no secret that there's a leaked beta of Vista SP1 floating around, but no-one yet has really taken the time to analyse it in detail to find out what it really does.

I made it my mission this weekend to trawl through the registry and file changes in SP1 to find out as best I could exactly what SP1 does.

First up, I can say that there is a very noticeable performance increase. It is obvious that since Microsoft released Vista to manufacturing, it has been optimising the code ever since. (I suspect this revelation will fuel the fires of the people who say Vista was released before it was ready for prime-time.) There’s far less hard drive thrashing and in general the system seems much smoother and more responsive.

Amusingly, the build of SP1 we saw (which in this beta comes fully integrated into a 3.2GB Vista install DVD, rather than as a standalone update) still has Microsoft's internal network shares embedded as the source of the updates. For example:

\\\\winbuilds3\\longhorn_SP1Beta1\\longhorn_SP1Beta1
\\6001.16549.070628-1825\\x86fre\\packages\\ServicePack"

Not that that info is really useful to anyone, but it mildly tickled our curiosity bone (next to the funny bone) to see the file layout of Microsoft's internal distribution shares.

Vista SP1Vista SP1

The first noticable change is obviously the version number. Windows Vista has a build number of 6.0.6000, whereas this build is 6.0.6001 (full version number is 6001.16549). This is quite interesting as one of the much-anticipated (and officially acknowledged) changes in SP1 was to bring the Vista kernel up to the same kernel as that used in Windows 2008 (version 6.1). It's possible that this aspect of the service pack is still in development, and not included in this version of the private beta.

Vista SP1 Build NumberVista SP1 Build Number

Normally, service packs don’t include new features – Windows XP SP2 being the standout exception. By and large this seems to be true of Vista SP1, although there is a new maintenance application called “Create a Recovery Disc”. This isn’t the same thing as creating a backup of the system to DVD – instead this process creates a recovery DVD which you can use with system recovery options if you don’t have an original Windows DVD or you can’t access OEM recovery tools.

Create Your Own Recovery DiscCreate Your Own Recovery Disc

At this point in its development, SP1 comes installed with four updates:

  • Service Pack for Microsoft Windows (KB936330)
  • Service Pack for Microsoft Windows (KB937286)
  • Hotfix for Microsoft Windows (KB937287)
  • Update for Microsoft Windows (KB938371)

There is a full list of suspected hotfixes that were to be included with Vista SP1 (check them out at www.vistasp1.net), but these four are not on the list. Unfortunately as the beta is not yet public, there’s no publicly-accessible information out there about these updates.

However, some hours of digging around in the registry did uncover quite a bit of information, mostly to do with the package load of each update and the Windows components it influences (bear in mind that this information is current for this particular version of SP1 – it may change in the public beta and in the final release).

Poking around in the registry: reveals a surprising amount about the private life of an OS updatePoking around in the registry: reveals a surprising amount about the private life of an OS update

Service Pack for Microsoft Windows (KB936330) contains 133 individual packages and is by far the biggest of the updates, so will probably be the service pack as we think of it. It is applied to the following Vista components:

  • AxInstallService
  • Backup
  • BLB Client
  • Branding Ultimate Client
  • BRCpl Basic/Premium/Pro & BRCpl Basic/Premium/Pro Language Pack
  • Capture Wizard
  • Client Features
  • ClipsInTheLibrary
  • CodecPack Basic Encoder/Package
  • Desktop Manager
  • DFSR Client Edition
  • Disk Diagnosis
  • Fax Client (for all versions of Vista)
  • Foundation
  • Group Policy Client Extensions / Client Tools
  • Help Core Client
  • IIS WebServer AddOn (38 packages are devoted to this component)
  • IIS WebServer (another 18 packages for this component)
  • Indexing Service
  • Media Center / Media Format / Media Player
  • MobilePC Basic/Premium/SideShow
  • MovieMaker
  • MSMQ Client
  • NetFx3 OC
  • NFS Client
  • Offline Files
  • Optical Media
  • Parental Controls
  • Peer-to-Peer AdHoc Meetings / Full
  • Photo Basic/Premium
  • Previous Versions
  • Printing Foundation / Printing Premium Tools / Printing XP Services
  • RDC (Remote Desktop Connection)
  • RecDisc
  • Remote Assistance
  • Removable Storage Management
  • Secure Startup
  • ServicingBaseline (for all versions of Windows)
  • Shell Inbox Games / Premium Inbox Games
  • Simple TCP
  • SNMP Package
  • SUA (Subsystem for UNIX Applications)
  • System Restore
  • TabletPC OC
  • Telnet Client / Telnet Server
  • Terminal Services Command Line Tools / Misc Redirection / USB Redirector / WM Provider
  • Windows Foundation Language Packs
  • WMI SNMP Provider
  • WMP Network Sharing Service
  • MSSSVC Rules (for all versions of Vista)
  • Server Help (for all versions of Vista)

Service Pack for Microsoft Windows (KB937286) contains 28 packages. The bulk of the updates are applied to the Windows Help Core Client, but it also affects client packages for:

  • Windows MobilePC (Basic, Premium, SideShow and Help)
  • Windows ServicingBaseline (for all versions of Windows Vista)
  • Server Help (for all versions of Windows Vista).

Hotfix for Microsoft Windows (KB937287) contains just one package, which is applied to the Servicing Stack, a component used in Vista imaging.

Update for Microsoft Windows (KB938371) contains three packages, which are applied to:

  • OS loader
  • Windows Task Scheduler Service
  • Windows Update Standalone Installer (WUSA)
  • Foundation Package
  • Common Log
  • Delta Package Expander
  • OLE Automation
  • All Windows Foundation and WindowsPE Language Packs

The services packs are very clearly directed towards backend services rather than frontend features. I pointed the SP1 system to Windows Update to see whether it needed any Vista updates, and it didn’t. So as expected, all Vista updates since Vista was released (and there haven’t been many) have been bundled into SP1.

The Vista SP1 packages: you can uninstall them from the SP1 build if you so desire, and return to bog standard Vista RTM.The Vista SP1 packages: you can uninstall them from the SP1 build if you so desire, and return to bog standard Vista RTM.

Performance and Compatibility

This service pack isn’t to be confused with two enhancement packs which were leaked to the public a few weeks ago, and then officially released by Microsoft with virtually no fanfare on the 8th and the 9th. These two updates address compatibility and performance features in Vista.

The “compatibility” update (KB938194), “improves the compatibility and reliability of Windows Vista” in the following scenarios:

  • The screen may go blank when you try to upgrade the video driver. For more information, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
  • 932539 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/932539/) The screen may go blank when you try to upgrade the video driver on a Windows Vista-based computer
  • The computer stops responding, and you receive a "Display driver stopped responding and has recovered" error message. You can restart the computer only by pressing the computer's power button.
  • The computer stops responding or restarts unexpectedly when you play video games or perform desktop operations.
  • The Diagnostic Policy Service (DPS) stops responding when the computer is under heavy load or when very little memory is available. This problem prevents diagnostics from working.
  • The screen goes blank after an external display device that is connected to the computer is turned off. For example, this problem may occur when a projector is turned off during a presentation.
  • There are stability issues with some graphics processing units (GPUs). These issues could cause GPUs to stop responding (hang).
  • Visual appearance issues occur when you play graphics-intensive games.
  • You experience poor playback quality when you play HD DVD disks or Blu-ray disks on a large monitor.
  • Applications that load the Netcfgx.dll component exit unexpectedly.
  • Windows Calendar exits unexpectedly after you create a new appointment, create a new task, and then restart the computer.
  • Internet Connection Sharing stops responding after you upgrade a computer that is running Microsoft Windows XP to Windows Vista and then restart the computer.
  • The Printer Spooler service stops unexpectedly.
  • You receive a "Stop 0x0000009F" error when you put the computer to sleep while a Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) connection is active. For more information, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
  • 931671 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931671/) Error message when you put a Windows Vista-based computer to sleep while a PPP connection is active: "STOP 0x0000009F"

The “performance” update (KB938979), “improves the performance and reliability of Windows Vista” in the following scenarios:

  • You experience a long delay when you try to exit the Photos screen saver.
  • A memory leak occurs when you use the Windows Energy screen saver.
  • If User Account Control is disabled on the computer, you cannot install a network printer successfully. This problem occurs if the network printer is hosted by a Windows XP-based or a Windows Server 2003-based computer.
  • When you write data to an AVI file by using the AVIStreamWrite function, the file header of the AVI file is corrupted.
  • When you copy or move a large file, the "estimated time remaining" takes a long time to be calculated and displayed.
  • After you resume the computer from hibernation, it takes a long time to display the logon screen.
  • When you synchronize an offline file to a server, the offline file is corrupted.
  • If you edit an image file that uses the RAW image format, data loss occurs in the image file. This problem occurs if the RAW image is from any of the following digital SLR camera models:
    • Canon EOS 1D
    • Canon EOS 1DS
  • After you resume the computer from hibernation, the computer loses its default gateway address.
  • Poor memory management performance occurs.

That last one is wonderfully vague. And I’ve certainly experienced the “estimated time remaining” problem, so I’ll be applying that particular update.

Both updates are available for 32- and 64-bit versions of Vista.

Because the packages bundled into the service pack aren’t labelled by their KB number, it’s hard to say with certainty whether these updates have been incorporated.

There are many rumours flying around as to when SP1 will be released, but there's nothing really concrete. The best that can be said is that the public beta is due later in the year, with the final release happening sometime in 2008.

The big question is whether the hint of a service pack on the horizon will encourage businesses to hold off deploying Vista, especially if they're contemplating Windows Server 2008 as well. This isn't a situation Microsoft wants, but if it's generally known that Vista SP1 has substantial advantages of non-SP1, it's difficult to make a business case for early adoption.

Personally, I haven't had too many problems with Vista to speak of, but if this private beta is anything like the final release, it can’t come soon enough. I want those performance improvements on my main desktop machines!


Post your comment



First 50 Comments

View All Comments (65) RSS feed Email alert

Anymouse:

This update made a HUGE difference for me when dealing with large video files, or large numbers of video files.

Drag and drop in Vista now feels less like drag and die, and thumbnailing happens significantly faster.

Worlds of difference.

Your reality may vary, not a guarentee, void where prohibited, perfomed on a closed track, do not try this at home, always consult a doctor and please, please spay and neuter your periferals.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

r3ap3r:

Same here, especially when using Roxio Media Creator 9. With a full install of Roxio, if you use custom install instead of standard, and accidently install programs which are not supported by Vista(something incompatible with Vista... I'm shocked), you will have issues. In an attempt to fix it, you will find the manual update at Roxio.com. But when you install it, it gets stuck (hung) and you can't do crap... even EndTask won't work; so you go to StopProcessTree in task manager, and then Windows Explorer gets stuck in what I have termed the "death loop". Every 30 seconds or so, you get the error "windows explorer has stopped working" followed by "windows explorer is restarting", which some people may have already seen with IE. Funny thing is (not that funny), even booting in SafeMode will not stop this loop; nothing will... or so it seems, until I finally figured out how to fix it. The cause it a codec, the solution is too long to post and it has never been posted or written yet. If this is your issue, even if you don't have Roxio (I have seen other people with similar errors from flash.ocx and woga.dll corruption), and Google picked up the error messages in this post and led you here, email me @ webmaster@r3ap3rinc.com for the low down on how to fix it; unless you are a complete noob, because I don't have the patience to give you details on how to use msconfig, run a cmd, or load a .bat file :-)

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

r3ap3r:

Same here, especially when using Roxio Media Creator 9. With a full install of Roxio, if you use custom install instead of standard, and accidently install programs which are not supported by Vista(something incompatible with Vista... I'm shocked), you will have issues. In an attempt to fix it, you will find the manual update at Roxio.com. But when you install it, it gets stuck (hung) and you can't do crap... even EndTask won't work; so you go to StopProcessTree in task manager, and then Windows Explorer gets stuck in what I have termed the "death loop". Every 30 seconds or so, you get the error "windows explorer has stopped working" followed by "windows explorer is restarting", which some people may have already seen with IE. Funny thing is (not that funny), even booting in SafeMode will not stop this loop; nothing will... or so it seems, until I finally figured out how to fix it. The cause it a codec, the solution is too long to post and it has never been posted or written yet. If this is your issue, even if you don't have Roxio (I have seen other people with similar errors from flash.ocx and woga.dll corruption), and Google picked up the error messages in this post and led you here, email me @ webmaster@r3ap3rinc.com for the low down on how to fix it; unless you are a complete noob, because I don't have the patience to give you details on how to use msconfig, run a cmd, or load a .bat file :-)

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan:

I pointed the SP1 system to Windows Update to see whether it needed any Vista updates, and it didn’t.

That's not how Windows Update functions. You check against WU was undoubtedly very quick as your version 6001.16549 is higher than the base 6.0.6000 and shows are more current than anything on WU. It's simply XML comparisons.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

MiCCAS.net:

dugg! Great post!

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Bry:

I would be interested to know whether Service Pack 1 (even at this early stage) improves on fast user switching. On my desktop I have two user accounts usually running at same time (me + g/f), switching between these is so incredibly slow when compared to XP SP2 days, and that on a C2D system.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

The Slasher:

No question Windows Vista was a beta when released in January.

Windows Vista SP1 will be the final released to market version.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous90:

Yep, Vista real RTM December 1, 2007 everything else beforehand was mere beta testing given the performance issues which should have been fixed before RTM Nov 2006, shame Microsoft shame.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous510:

I didnt see any fix for the VPN credentials manager issue.

PPTP VPN connections to other domains still cause the credential manager to discard the local credentials and thereby deny you access to your local shares...

The "Workaround" sorta fixes it by discarding VPN shares and restoring local credentials, but that makes the VPN kinda pointless and not so user friendly..

I guess Vista VPN Credentials will never work :(

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Smartass:

Vista was released in February but thanks for playing.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

System48:

Vista's RTM was Nov '06, retail was Jan '07. Maybe you should take the "smart" out of your name and change it to "dumb".

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

n-blue:

lol, yeb that's fun.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Smarter than your ass:

It was released to manufacturers in November (I also got mine then cos I got a free copy for beta testing) but it was released to the public in February. Thx for playing once again. Try again.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC administrator:

It was released to business volume licence customers in November too.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Even more Smarter than smartass! :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista

so lemme get this straight, jan 30th is really february and NOT in january? hmm.

wikipedia FTW! dumbass....

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Balihoo:

It was released to the general population on Jan. 30 2007. Please don't spout when you don't know what you're talking about.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous321:

Can't any of you recognize a joke when you see one?

Great article, thanks.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tim Long:

Nice balanced analysis. Thanks.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Lasse:

But where do I get this leaked SP1? :)

- Lasse

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Bill:

Dude, nicely done.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

apc reader:

good in depth analysis. im still holding out till more SP's come out before i upgrade to eliminate all problems.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

axel:

this was made by peolpe of microsoft. theres no leaked on sp1 of vista.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Snuffy:

VISTA SP1 is not a FAKE. its really out there.
only special beta testers get it. and you don't what it.. It is TIME-SENSITIVE. other wise it will stop working. That means your Vista is DEAD. When and If MS decides to release to the public you will enjoy it. IF YOUR VERSION IS LEGIT.


29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Fnaarrrrrr:

If SP1 will be the version that should have been released to market first, then I'll wait for SP2, because I ran Vista when it first came out and it made my kitten die.

:(

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Dan:

Put Vista Ultimate on 6 PCs I built for customers. One by one they would slowly 'lose drivers' for basic devices, like the DVD drives, they just would not be there after a reboot, each about a week after install, same problem, and the best info I could get was that a 'needed driver was not found' though every driver in the inf folder was there as when installed. I was forced to trash the $ spent on Vista and revert back to XP.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Gaz:

Now Axel, don't be silly. considering the first line of this article reads - "It's no secret that there's a leaked beta of Vista SP1 floating around", it would seem you couldn't be more wrong.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Chris M:

And they still haven't fixed the major 3D sound problems, if they still don't want to fix the 3D sound issues, Microsoft can shove Vista up their arse.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Mackintire:

Direct Sound was removed...Its not broken. It just does not exist on Vista. Vista uses OpenAL for sound currently. Creative Labs recently created some translation software to make most of their EAX functions work by translating them to OpenAL. Microsoft has recently announced a new Sound interface that will be added with DirectX 10.1. That interface will contain another new path that soundcards can use. It will take a while but eventually your sound card will work again. Its just going to take an entirely new driver model to make it happen. I 'd say most everything will be fixed and working by mid 2008.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jug:

Note that DX10.1 will be incompatible with DX10 hardware though. I'm not sure if that applies to sound cards, but it do apply to video cards, like Geforce 8's. They won't support DirectX 10.1 and are already obsolete.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Paul:

Current DX10 hardware incompatible and obsolete???
Erm... NO! LOL!
Sure you won't be able to utilise 10.1's additional functionality but they are certainly NOT obsolete and won't be for many years. LOL.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

LouisVuitton:

This statement, about all direct-x 10.1 cards becoming incompatible and obsolete is the most tripe incomprehensible and obstinate statement I've read in a while.

ANY new iteration of DirectX exists to introduce new or expand upon exisiting features, which is a byproduct of media technology and hardware feature development.

DX 10.1 will come like all the secondary incremental advancements (DX9 to DX9.xx vs. DX9 to DX10) and we're all no stranger to them.

I don't think they warranted then, and certainly not now, the incitement of RIOT by telling people the couple hundred dollars they just spent stepping up to DX10 just went the way of the DODO.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Nicholas:

DirectSound is not removed! Accelerating DirectSound3D through hardware is what was removed. This makes stuff like EAX "impossible" on Vista, but Creative has released "Alchemy", which wraps EAX calls in OpenAL calls automatically on Vista.

Check out my blog post on the subject.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

jcopin:

does this mean faxing will be added back to vista home? it said in the updates fax client all versions.. this would be great and i can stop dual booting

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous1:

Wow, why would anyone still fax, that is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard of. It is called Email, get used to it.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC administrator:

Unfortunately there are two things that still can't be easily or safely emailed: credit card details and signatures. For companies that don't have an online ordering process and require a signature, fax is still a necessity unfortunately. 



29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Anonymous324234234:

Fax is not secure at all. Most people think it is. As it isn't encrypted the information can be stolen easily.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

13xforever:

2 things here: cryptography (for sensitive information) & digital signature (for signing)

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

APC administrator:

Are you serious? Do you seriously think I can ring a garden supply company and say "I'm just sending a credit card order -- you'll need my public key to read the email and you can use my digital signature to process the order through Mastercard"?

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Token Female:

Marriage certificates and divorce decrees still come on dead trees. Getting those sent to your bank, your phone company, your utilities companies, etc, still requires a way to transmit a dead-tree copy.

Fax remains useful for that purpose.

Of course, the tech community is full of guys, so you don't ever have to deal with name changes, I imagine.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

JeffP:

Dead Trees can be *scanned*... It works like a xerox machine (that would be a copier to us guys...), and instead of another dead tree falling out of the machine, there is a digital image on your hard drive. You then send that digital image as an attachment to the e-mail... Sometimes guys do think of those things, after all we end up paying the price after living with you gals if we don't.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Nihonin:

Couldn't have said it better myself JeffP, probably why I didn't lol

29 February 2008, 8:48 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

decepticon:

Why would anyone use faxing?! Are you dumb as a dornail or just plain 'special'. Businesses use faxes all the time. I don't know if you've noticed, but the digital paper has NOT been adopted as the only means for verification. Groups, organizations, governments (our own anyway), and businesses still rely on HARD COPIES as proof or evidence. THINK before you post.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

cpet:

"Are you dumb as a dornail or just plain 'special'."

If you're going to state if someone is dumb make sure you spell it right ? It's doornail not dornail.

Get it right stupid.



29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Peter van de Beek:

You'll better get Vista Business then, cause they have an application for that in it. Or Vista Ultimate, if you also need Media Center. (but you'll pay you're ass off, however OEM's are quite cheap)

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Kryt:

Nice, Jug - If there was an award for bull, you'd have first and second prizes!
DX10.1 has no/little enhancement in video and GF8 series chipsets will fully support it.

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

NickM:

Has anyone noticed if this sp will enable SLI in vista now???

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Jeebs:

As I understand it, DX 10.1 does nothing more than make currently optional protocols mandatory. I understand that most developers don't care / aren't bothered about the changes 10.1 brings. But I do believe that current gen hardware does not support the new instructions

I feel it only serves the industry better, by driving yet another nail in DX's coffin... bring on Open GL and be done with Bill's evil api.

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

godlikesme:

I am surprised that there isn't much news on video and display fixes when using an external monitor with a notebook computer.

I have had so many problems on several different notebooks where after like 4-5 hours of inactivity the screen goes blank and although the computer is still "on" (i.e. not asleep, hibernating etc.) I can't get the display to turn back on no matter what I do. My only recourse is to power off the computer whereby I lose all of my display settings. My external monitor which was my primary display becomes the secondary and the notebook display becomes the primary!!! It drives me crazy!!!

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Exoskeletor:

i have the same problem too but i think sp1 has fix this

29 February 2008, 8:47 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

goorambatman:

Ok this is all well and good but does any one know where we can get Vista SP1 Beta?

29 February 2008, 8:31 PM (2 years ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

View all comments (65)  

anonymous user Anonymous user


Tags